linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, willy@infradead.org,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: remove prefetchw() on freeing page to buddy system
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 23:22:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240701232224.43d5243ec9f15aa3e29a7ec5@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240702020931.7061-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com>

On Tue,  2 Jul 2024 02:09:31 +0000 Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> wrote:

> The prefetchw() is introduced from an ancient patch[1].
> 
> The change log says:
> 
>     The basic idea is to free higher order pages instead of going
>     through every single one.  Also, some unnecessary atomic operations
>     are done away with and replaced with non-atomic equivalents, and
>     prefetching is done where it helps the most.  For a more in-depth
>     discusion of this patch, please see the linux-ia64 archives (topic
>     is "free bootmem feedback patch").
> 
> So there are several changes improve the bootmem freeing, in which the
> most basic idea is freeing higher order pages. And as Matthew says,
> "Itanium CPUs of this era had no prefetchers."
> 
> I did 10 round bootup tests before and after this change, the data
> doesn't prove prefetchw() help speeding up bootmem freeing. The sum of
> the 10 round bootmem freeing time after prefetchw() removal even 5.2%
> faster than before.

I don't think I've ever seen prefetch make a damn bit of difference.

> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ia64/40F46962.4090604@sgi.com/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
> Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> CC: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> 
> ---
> The patch is based on mm-stable with David's change.

Oh help.  David makes many changes.  Please identify patches with much
care.  Fully quoting the email title works, as does a link.




  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-02  6:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-02  2:09 [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: remove prefetchw() on freeing page to buddy system Wei Yang
2024-07-02  6:22 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2024-07-03  0:01   ` Wei Yang
2024-07-03  0:49     ` Andrew Morton
2024-07-03  0:55       ` Wei Yang
2024-07-02  6:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-03  0:12   ` Wei Yang
2024-07-03  8:40     ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-04  3:30   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-07-04  3:37     ` Andrew Morton
2024-07-04  3:39       ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-07-04  3:43         ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240701232224.43d5243ec9f15aa3e29a7ec5@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).