From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: ying.huang@intel.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] mm/page_alloc: Avoid changing pcp->high decaying when adjusting CONFIG_PCP_BATCH_SCALE_MAX
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2024 17:49:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240707094956.94654-3-laoar.shao@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240707094956.94654-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com>
When adjusting the CONFIG_PCP_BATCH_SCALE_MAX configuration from its
default value of 5 to a lower value, such as 0, it's important to ensure
that the pcp->high decaying is not inadvertently slowed down. Similarly,
when increasing CONFIG_PCP_BATCH_SCALE_MAX to a larger value, like 6, we
must avoid inadvertently increasing the number of pages freed in
free_pcppages_bulk() as a result of this change.
So below improvements are made:
- hardcode the default value of 5 to avoiding modifying the pcp->high
- refactore free_pcppages_bulk() into multiple steps, with each step
processing a fixed batch size of pages
Suggested-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 15 +++++++++++----
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 8e2f4e1ab4f2..2b76754a48e0 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -2247,7 +2247,7 @@ static int rmqueue_bulk(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order,
int decay_pcp_high(struct zone *zone, struct per_cpu_pages *pcp)
{
int high_min, to_drain, batch;
- int todo = 0;
+ int todo = 0, count = 0;
high_min = READ_ONCE(pcp->high_min);
batch = READ_ONCE(pcp->batch);
@@ -2257,18 +2257,25 @@ int decay_pcp_high(struct zone *zone, struct per_cpu_pages *pcp)
* control latency. This caps pcp->high decrement too.
*/
if (pcp->high > high_min) {
- pcp->high = max3(pcp->count - (batch << CONFIG_PCP_BATCH_SCALE_MAX),
+ /* When tuning the pcp batch scale value, we want to ensure that
+ * the pcp->high decay rate is not slowed down. Therefore, we
+ * hard-code the historical default scale value of 5 here to
+ * prevent any unintended effects.
+ */
+ pcp->high = max3(pcp->count - (batch << 5),
pcp->high - (pcp->high >> 3), high_min);
if (pcp->high > high_min)
todo++;
}
to_drain = pcp->count - pcp->high;
- if (to_drain > 0) {
+ while (count < to_drain) {
spin_lock(&pcp->lock);
- free_pcppages_bulk(zone, to_drain, pcp, 0);
+ free_pcppages_bulk(zone, batch, pcp, 0);
spin_unlock(&pcp->lock);
+ count += batch;
todo++;
+ cond_resched();
}
return todo;
--
2.43.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-07 9:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-07 9:49 [PATCH 0/3] mm/page_alloc: Introduce a new sysctl knob vm.pcp_batch_scale_max Yafang Shao
2024-07-07 9:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/page_alloc: A minor fix to the calculation of pcp->free_count Yafang Shao
2024-07-10 1:52 ` Huang, Ying
2024-07-07 9:49 ` Yafang Shao [this message]
2024-07-10 1:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm/page_alloc: Avoid changing pcp->high decaying when adjusting CONFIG_PCP_BATCH_SCALE_MAX Huang, Ying
2024-07-10 2:07 ` Yafang Shao
2024-07-07 9:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm/page_alloc: Introduce a new sysctl knob vm.pcp_batch_scale_max Yafang Shao
2024-07-10 2:49 ` Huang, Ying
2024-07-11 2:21 ` Yafang Shao
2024-07-11 6:42 ` Huang, Ying
2024-07-11 7:25 ` Yafang Shao
2024-07-11 8:18 ` Huang, Ying
2024-07-11 9:51 ` Yafang Shao
2024-07-11 10:49 ` Huang, Ying
2024-07-11 12:45 ` Yafang Shao
2024-07-12 1:19 ` Huang, Ying
2024-07-12 2:25 ` Yafang Shao
2024-07-12 3:05 ` Huang, Ying
2024-07-12 3:44 ` Yafang Shao
2024-07-12 5:25 ` Huang, Ying
2024-07-12 5:41 ` Yafang Shao
2024-07-12 6:16 ` Huang, Ying
2024-07-12 6:41 ` Yafang Shao
2024-07-12 7:04 ` Huang, Ying
2024-07-12 7:36 ` Yafang Shao
2024-07-12 8:24 ` Huang, Ying
2024-07-12 8:49 ` Yafang Shao
2024-07-12 9:10 ` Huang, Ying
2024-07-12 9:24 ` Yafang Shao
2024-07-12 9:46 ` Yafang Shao
2024-07-15 1:09 ` Huang, Ying
2024-07-15 4:32 ` Yafang Shao
2024-07-10 3:00 ` [PATCH 0/3] " Huang, Ying
2024-07-11 2:25 ` Yafang Shao
2024-07-11 6:38 ` Huang, Ying
2024-07-11 7:21 ` Yafang Shao
2024-07-11 8:36 ` Huang, Ying
2024-07-11 9:40 ` Yafang Shao
2024-07-11 11:03 ` Huang, Ying
2024-07-11 12:40 ` Yafang Shao
2024-07-12 2:32 ` Huang, Ying
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240707094956.94654-3-laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--to=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).