From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Rick P Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
peterx@redhat.com, Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 5/8] mm/x86: Make pud_leaf() only cares about PSE bit
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 15:21:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240715192142.3241557-6-peterx@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240715192142.3241557-1-peterx@redhat.com>
An entry should be reported as PUD leaf even if it's PROT_NONE, in which
case PRESENT bit isn't there. I hit bad pud without this when testing dax
1G on zapping a PROT_NONE PUD.
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 65b8e5bb902c..25fc6d809572 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -1073,8 +1073,7 @@ static inline pmd_t *pud_pgtable(pud_t pud)
#define pud_leaf pud_leaf
static inline bool pud_leaf(pud_t pud)
{
- return (pud_val(pud) & (_PAGE_PSE | _PAGE_PRESENT)) ==
- (_PAGE_PSE | _PAGE_PRESENT);
+ return pud_val(pud) & _PAGE_PSE;
}
static inline int pud_bad(pud_t pud)
--
2.45.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-15 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-15 19:21 [PATCH v3 0/8] mm/mprotect: Fix dax puds Peter Xu
2024-07-15 19:21 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] mm/dax: Dump start address in fault handler Peter Xu
2024-07-31 12:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-02 22:43 ` Peter Xu
2024-07-15 19:21 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] mm/mprotect: Remove NUMA_HUGE_PTE_UPDATES Peter Xu
2024-07-31 12:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-04 15:06 ` Peter Xu
2024-08-06 13:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-06 16:26 ` Peter Xu
2024-08-06 16:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-06 16:51 ` Peter Xu
2024-07-15 19:21 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] mm/mprotect: Push mmu notifier to PUDs Peter Xu
2024-07-15 19:21 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] mm/powerpc: Add missing pud helpers Peter Xu
2024-07-15 19:21 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2024-07-31 12:22 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] mm/x86: Make pud_leaf() only cares about PSE bit David Hildenbrand
2024-07-15 19:21 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] mm/x86: arch_check_zapped_pud() Peter Xu
2024-07-31 12:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-15 19:21 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] mm/x86: Add missing pud helpers Peter Xu
2024-07-15 19:21 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] mm/mprotect: fix dax pud handlings Peter Xu
2024-07-25 18:29 ` James Houghton
2024-07-25 22:41 ` Peter Xu
2024-07-26 0:23 ` James Houghton
2024-07-26 11:56 ` Peter Xu
2024-07-15 20:00 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] mm/mprotect: Fix dax puds Peter Xu
2024-07-24 15:15 ` Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240715192142.3241557-6-peterx@redhat.com \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).