From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B82BC5321D for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 20:54:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id F3D906B00B2; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:54:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id EEFE66B00B6; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:54:38 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id D667D6B00B7; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:54:38 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0011.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.11]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85CE6B00B2 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:54:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin11.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 732151A13EA for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 20:54:38 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 82495600236.11.C7AAE86 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.14]) by imf22.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B88C0004 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 20:54:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf22.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b="J2DlK/86"; spf=pass (imf22.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com designates 192.198.163.14 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1724705589; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=t/bl/SzUE0ZtuCZ2BJC1xJ0FGGYei/Aai7nKzN4afCM=; b=L6xFk6aLarMgJbcyBMHjrxI5xTBMiIjR0L6R8EjfcP7Pd5TsCeAPdNlYrWAmoAvOvNDxdN D8WKR0VGijIixCCNk1Ts3WIfGFf3sPAu9eT2K1EZzKYPKCKNdLOHc7NViYYLJa4dhdmzeY 1lsJEz2zkiVjKo+BRfw2EwKkz3yaBgw= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1724705589; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=t/Ql0Z6eExdtpgDeY5RH8ogLyQP9tWyJ3ziekU/dpRKv3MnWT/U3zUL2sMWRn0rEvb2/WC 9nJQgxNlfkQFuyXUzXtyRUYw4JQ66vspkxcmKgZiCF6Z0XPacMtOI37dreYvbad+chseIy Zw60v3/DzMo3lhgUZlIt3AIR0ifZ9u0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf22.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b="J2DlK/86"; spf=pass (imf22.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com designates 192.198.163.14 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1724705675; x=1756241675; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=k+TQRYD+JH8C/rBpKmaN1zOafqMznb8cVJmo0xOJUb0=; b=J2DlK/86oHBfHi9cG/l1ByHtLKj3KZxVWyFRW2lpjPTPwUn2Lqa2ko9L 9qp5vgmQ5jZ0Ipzp13mUmK2DcJJ2cDVcJipCleHaF1pgeIyB1spqYVu/I OvguD/W5oFbnq//NMxzfNMQ7bJNErR3uth0lmWEalexKpNJLaphoHC9z/ LjKbG/wVPgE2R6HSWLJM564vO0wy3Qdoqu9dMxLTUyRxldZE+H0sgI967 u5CXRL3CNKJzrRvQsQm+wuQTXuj31Us+6f4uDS+/KuQO6NbLHXIRQCJph PokAMRyIrVNonHmwZqDUQPWCqT93t2MHNlfCMq2n2M7ec1w8vnfc7bPKs Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ZTmig27BTZ2uDxWiv4+h/Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: HA8IHXhOTfa5BcfgD09+Zw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11176"; a="23332956" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,178,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="23332956" Received: from orviesa008.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.148]) by fmvoesa108.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Aug 2024 13:54:34 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Ns8CnMvxRZ6DEQfFoFoGVg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: apbdG7+TS1uH63Jl7VN+2Q== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,178,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="63365817" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 9a732dc145d3) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Aug 2024 13:54:30 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 9a732dc145d3 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1sigjL-000Hai-0L; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 20:54:27 +0000 Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 04:53:28 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Michal Hocko , Andrew Morton Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Linux Memory Management List , Christoph Hellwig , Yafang Shao , Kent Overstreet , jack@suse.cz, Christian Brauner , Alexander Viro , Paul Moore , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bcachefs: do not use PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM Message-ID: <202408270446.6Ew7FPHA-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240826085347.1152675-2-mhocko@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240826085347.1152675-2-mhocko@kernel.org> X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 05B88C0004 X-Stat-Signature: gkoq1t6szbhr476skjkmjwjf4xx3tu3q X-HE-Tag: 1724705674-270659 X-HE-Meta: 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 n1qrKJcC 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 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hi Michal, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on akpm-mm/mm-everything] [also build test ERROR on tip/sched/core brauner-vfs/vfs.all linus/master v6.11-rc5] [cannot apply to next-20240826] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Michal-Hocko/bcachefs-do-not-use-PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM/20240826-171013 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240826085347.1152675-2-mhocko%40kernel.org patch subject: [PATCH 1/2] bcachefs: do not use PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM config: arm-randconfig-003-20240827 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240827/202408270446.6Ew7FPHA-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 20.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 08e5a1de8227512d4774a534b91cb2353cef6284) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240827/202408270446.6Ew7FPHA-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408270446.6Ew7FPHA-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from fs/bcachefs/fs.c:4: In file included from fs/bcachefs/bcachefs.h:188: In file included from include/linux/bio.h:10: In file included from include/linux/blk_types.h:10: In file included from include/linux/bvec.h:10: In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:8: In file included from include/linux/cacheflush.h:5: In file included from arch/arm/include/asm/cacheflush.h:10: In file included from include/linux/mm.h:2198: include/linux/vmstat.h:518:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 518 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_" | ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~ >> fs/bcachefs/fs.c:248:60: error: too many arguments provided to function-like macro invocation 248 | if (unlikely(inode_init_always_gfp(c->vfs_sb, &inode->v), gfp)) { | ^ include/linux/compiler.h:77:10: note: macro 'unlikely' defined here 77 | # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0) | ^ >> fs/bcachefs/fs.c:248:6: error: use of undeclared identifier 'unlikely' 248 | if (unlikely(inode_init_always_gfp(c->vfs_sb, &inode->v), gfp)) { | ^ >> fs/bcachefs/fs.c:261:60: error: use of undeclared identifier 'GFP_NOWARN' 261 | struct bch_inode_info *inode = __bch2_new_inode(trans->c, GFP_NOWARN | GFP_NOWAIT); | ^ 1 warning and 3 errors generated. vim +248 fs/bcachefs/fs.c 233 234 static struct bch_inode_info *__bch2_new_inode(struct bch_fs *c, gfp_t gfp) 235 { 236 struct bch_inode_info *inode = kmem_cache_alloc(bch2_inode_cache, gfp); 237 if (!inode) 238 return NULL; 239 240 inode_init_once(&inode->v); 241 mutex_init(&inode->ei_update_lock); 242 two_state_lock_init(&inode->ei_pagecache_lock); 243 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&inode->ei_vfs_inode_list); 244 inode->ei_flags = 0; 245 mutex_init(&inode->ei_quota_lock); 246 memset(&inode->ei_devs_need_flush, 0, sizeof(inode->ei_devs_need_flush)); 247 > 248 if (unlikely(inode_init_always_gfp(c->vfs_sb, &inode->v), gfp)) { 249 kmem_cache_free(bch2_inode_cache, inode); 250 return NULL; 251 } 252 253 return inode; 254 } 255 256 /* 257 * Allocate a new inode, dropping/retaking btree locks if necessary: 258 */ 259 static struct bch_inode_info *bch2_new_inode(struct btree_trans *trans) 260 { > 261 struct bch_inode_info *inode = __bch2_new_inode(trans->c, GFP_NOWARN | GFP_NOWAIT); 262 263 if (unlikely(!inode)) { 264 int ret = drop_locks_do(trans, (inode = __bch2_new_inode(trans->c, GFP_NOFS)) ? 0 : -ENOMEM); 265 if (ret && inode) { 266 __destroy_inode(&inode->v); 267 kmem_cache_free(bch2_inode_cache, inode); 268 } 269 if (ret) 270 return ERR_PTR(ret); 271 } 272 273 return inode; 274 } 275 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki