From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA74C5472D for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2024 02:23:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 84BA36B0083; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 22:23:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 7FCF96B0088; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 22:23:51 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 69BB76B008A; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 22:23:51 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0010.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.10]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C296B0083 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 22:23:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin18.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5862161271 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2024 02:23:50 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 82496429820.18.1ED2C31 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.10]) by imf07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80BE640008 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2024 02:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf07.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=YrNICxvy; spf=pass (imf07.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com designates 192.198.163.10 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1724725385; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=hEcQYxDhAdh1A0M9frGTxWUBQPbZYVowvwJzG9V8m26lTlQJQ2nme62fkiDSLuWkBueQH4 DYNzjBAbhV7HR3zJqeEt0DEJd4uXHiv9nk7hX/AXDtIGEOu/rlcvsa4wmeIxqHW4PCo8pV XS1J566apbFNZX9b+Lfp51zhTkGPqiE= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf07.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=YrNICxvy; spf=pass (imf07.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com designates 192.198.163.10 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1724725385; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=C92Hznf1FJozfTlTJGQF06cFgjKVn5XRYzVieXdr7P4=; b=wyq66xamj1ZMPl4nG02v2Orm9nF/w8rjJIp5ktPhRs/Ni55/iXPZez4i9Ge3wJUXzy+BsP mI+1Em9SplOpuZSY1dDWXPfQaowDJReIP0kjgvpqjf/6c71k7i81tFkREhBqhTchwRGJ8U z+NWNQlmfF3cC7M2boFrc6J+oVa5H6s= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1724725428; x=1756261428; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=1+sHOJGfAv3d8ge8kXJJwvkdj5TiGGUN6rNeh4kdWzM=; b=YrNICxvy8TTnvkQRJURgKRtC16cXd8DqRBTKz4RuWTX3GsTebjy0p+Ns 7WDQTklp9fjX9lr28W/+v72Y+d708Sy3h8UNqXcq3GTkrJHphJBiHQB2T tVNBcHyNE2x9EZDh6wdk/lEvCNX0rck55FK1euBswI/GW1hO2nHogmpwM hyyYC9H/R0hpVhzf2dOW0MQ/b0WAlx9KFgVLSypuyMq+aeqlySGhDiXIO MY0XVg8h8UYhf4uJ4qePNpECJb6PfVrImiyrB2QtxBnAeHyzGPBUSxbUE jGGk+KIQ7Pvb7axwn++VTyJyu1UzXxoqJ54jLFKptqWKlULwAQB1z5ttN A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: vhurg4j2Rf6yG0H42OZwHg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: dWC6cOy8QoKJdeNoJJ6DHQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11176"; a="34588695" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,179,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="34588695" Received: from fmviesa002.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.142]) by fmvoesa104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Aug 2024 19:23:46 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: YwZL9LciQSqndo2/dXftPg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: t1P2njC9S/CqMPyGYv+p4w== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,179,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="85898308" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 9a732dc145d3) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Aug 2024 19:23:43 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 9a732dc145d3 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1silrw-000HnO-0L; Tue, 27 Aug 2024 02:23:40 +0000 Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 10:23:07 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Michal Hocko , Andrew Morton Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Linux Memory Management List , Christoph Hellwig , Yafang Shao , Kent Overstreet , jack@suse.cz, Christian Brauner , Alexander Viro , Paul Moore , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bcachefs: do not use PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM Message-ID: <202408271041.5IWf4ZQC-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240826085347.1152675-2-mhocko@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240826085347.1152675-2-mhocko@kernel.org> X-Stat-Signature: 3jqfxyswgrhry7skecx3d1d6d8g58fka X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 80BE640008 X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam10 X-HE-Tag: 1724725427-893288 X-HE-Meta: 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 B6eKoPnN 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 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hi Michal, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-everything] [also build test WARNING on tip/sched/core brauner-vfs/vfs.all linus/master v6.11-rc5] [cannot apply to next-20240826] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Michal-Hocko/bcachefs-do-not-use-PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM/20240826-171013 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240826085347.1152675-2-mhocko%40kernel.org patch subject: [PATCH 1/2] bcachefs: do not use PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-003-20240827 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240827/202408271041.5IWf4ZQC-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240827/202408271041.5IWf4ZQC-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408271041.5IWf4ZQC-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> security/security.c:664: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'gfp' not described in 'lsm_inode_alloc' >> security/security.c:1586: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'gfp' not described in 'security_inode_alloc' vim +664 security/security.c 33bf60cabcc768 Casey Schaufler 2018-11-12 654 afb1cbe37440c7 Casey Schaufler 2018-09-21 655 /** afb1cbe37440c7 Casey Schaufler 2018-09-21 656 * lsm_inode_alloc - allocate a composite inode blob afb1cbe37440c7 Casey Schaufler 2018-09-21 657 * @inode: the inode that needs a blob afb1cbe37440c7 Casey Schaufler 2018-09-21 658 * afb1cbe37440c7 Casey Schaufler 2018-09-21 659 * Allocate the inode blob for all the modules afb1cbe37440c7 Casey Schaufler 2018-09-21 660 * afb1cbe37440c7 Casey Schaufler 2018-09-21 661 * Returns 0, or -ENOMEM if memory can't be allocated. afb1cbe37440c7 Casey Schaufler 2018-09-21 662 */ b2ce84652b3193 Michal Hocko 2024-08-26 663 int lsm_inode_alloc(struct inode *inode, gfp_t gfp) afb1cbe37440c7 Casey Schaufler 2018-09-21 @664 { afb1cbe37440c7 Casey Schaufler 2018-09-21 665 if (!lsm_inode_cache) { afb1cbe37440c7 Casey Schaufler 2018-09-21 666 inode->i_security = NULL; afb1cbe37440c7 Casey Schaufler 2018-09-21 667 return 0; afb1cbe37440c7 Casey Schaufler 2018-09-21 668 } afb1cbe37440c7 Casey Schaufler 2018-09-21 669 b2ce84652b3193 Michal Hocko 2024-08-26 670 inode->i_security = kmem_cache_zalloc(lsm_inode_cache, gfp); afb1cbe37440c7 Casey Schaufler 2018-09-21 671 if (inode->i_security == NULL) afb1cbe37440c7 Casey Schaufler 2018-09-21 672 return -ENOMEM; afb1cbe37440c7 Casey Schaufler 2018-09-21 673 return 0; afb1cbe37440c7 Casey Schaufler 2018-09-21 674 } afb1cbe37440c7 Casey Schaufler 2018-09-21 675 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki