Re: [PATCH v6 02/11] KVM: x86: Relax locking for kvm_test_age_gfn and kvm_age_gfn

[Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>]

On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 10:09:30AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2024, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 08:47:59PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2024, James Houghton wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 6:05 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
> > > > > > +static __always_inline bool kvm_tdp_mmu_handle_gfn_lockless(
> > > > > > +             struct kvm *kvm,
> > > > > > +             struct kvm_gfn_range *range,
> > > > > > +             tdp_handler_t handler)
> > > > >
> > > > > Please burn all the Google3 from your brain, and code ;-)
> > > > 
> > > > I indented this way to avoid going past the 80 character limit. I've
> > > > adjusted it to be more like the other functions in this file.
> > > > 
> > > > Perhaps I should put `static __always_inline bool` on its own line?
> > > 
> > > Noooo. Do not wrap before the function name.  Linus has a nice explanation/rant
> > > on this[1].
> > 
> > IMHO, run clang-format on your stuff and just be happy with 99% of
> > what it spits out. Saves *so much time* and usually arguing..
> 
> Heh, nope, not bending on this one.  The time I spend far hunting for implementations
> because of wraps before the function name far exceeds the time it takes me to
> push back on these warts in review.

clangd solved that problem for me :)

Jason