From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>, Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"kasan-dev@googlegroups.com" <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm/slub: Improve data handling of krealloc() when orig_size is enabled
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 13:35:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202410141330.CAF56E3@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0e8d49d2-e89b-44df-9dff-29e8f24de105@suse.cz>
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 03:12:09PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 10/14/24 14:52, Feng Tang wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 10:53:32AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >> On 10/14/24 09:52, Feng Tang wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 05:52:10PM +0800, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >> > Thanks for the suggestion!
> >> >
> >> > As there were error report about the NULL slab for big kmalloc object, how
> >> > about the following code for
> >> >
> >> > __do_krealloc(const void *p, size_t new_size, gfp_t flags)
> >> > {
> >> > void *ret;
> >> > size_t ks = 0;
> >> > int orig_size = 0;
> >> > struct kmem_cache *s = NULL;
> >> >
> >> > /* Check for double-free. */
> >> > if (likely(!ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(p))) {
> >> > if (!kasan_check_byte(p))
> >> > return NULL;
> >> >
> >> > ks = ksize(p);
> >>
> >> I think this will result in __ksize() doing
> >> skip_orig_size_check(folio_slab(folio)->slab_cache, object);
> >> and we don't want that?
> >
> > I think that's fine. As later code will re-set the orig_size anyway.
>
> But you also read it first.
>
> >> > /* Some objects have no orig_size, like big kmalloc case */
> >> > if (is_kfence_address(p)) {
> >> > orig_size = kfence_ksize(p);
> >> > } else if (virt_to_slab(p)) {
> >> > s = virt_to_cache(p);
> >> > orig_size = get_orig_size(s, (void *)p);
>
> here.
>
> >> > }
>
> >> Also the checks below repeat some of the checks of ksize().
> >
> > Yes, there is some redundancy, mostly the virt_to_slab()
> >
> >> So I think in __do_krealloc() we should do things manually to determine ks
> >> and not call ksize(). Just not break any of the cases ksize() handles
> >> (kfence, large kmalloc).
> >
> > OK, originally I tried not to expose internals of __ksize(). Let me
> > try this way.
>
> ksize() makes assumptions that a user outside of slab itself is calling it.
>
> But we (well mostly Kees) also introduced kmalloc_size_roundup() to avoid
> querying ksize() for the purposes of writing beyond the original
> kmalloc(size) up to the bucket size. So maybe we can also investigate if the
> skip_orig_size_check() mechanism can be removed now?
>
> Still I think __do_krealloc() should rather do its own thing and not call
> ksize().
The goal was to avoid having users of the allocation APIs change the
sizes of allocations without calling into realloc. This is because
otherwise the "alloc_size" attribute used by compilers inform
__builtin_dynamic_object_size() can get confused:
ptr = alloc(less_than_bucket_size);
...
size = ksize(ptr); /* larger size! */
memcpy(ptr, src, size); /* compiler instrumentation doesn't see that ptr "grows" */
So the callers use kmalloc_size_roundup() to just allocate the rounded
up size immediately. Internally, the allocator can do what it wants.
--
Kees Cook
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-14 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-11 6:45 [PATCH v2 0/5] mm/slub: Improve data handling of krealloc() when orig_size is enabled Feng Tang
2024-09-11 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mm/kasan: Don't store metadata inside kmalloc object when slub_debug_orig_size is on Feng Tang
2024-09-11 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] mm/slub: Consider kfence case for get_orig_size() Feng Tang
2024-09-11 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] mm/slub: Move krealloc() and related code to slub.c Feng Tang
2024-09-11 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] mm/slub: Improve redzone check and zeroing for krealloc() Feng Tang
2024-09-11 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] mm/slub, kunit: Add testcase for krealloc redzone and zeroing Feng Tang
2024-10-02 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] mm/slub: Improve data handling of krealloc() when orig_size is enabled Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-04 6:44 ` Marco Elver
2024-10-04 9:18 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-04 9:52 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-04 10:28 ` Feng Tang
2024-10-14 7:52 ` Feng Tang
2024-10-14 8:53 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-14 12:52 ` Feng Tang
2024-10-14 13:12 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-14 14:20 ` Feng Tang
2024-10-14 20:40 ` Kees Cook
2024-11-04 11:28 ` Feng Tang
2024-11-04 11:45 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-11-04 12:37 ` Feng Tang
2024-10-14 20:35 ` Kees Cook [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202410141330.CAF56E3@keescook \
--to=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).