linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>, Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"kasan-dev@googlegroups.com" <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm/slub: Improve data handling of krealloc() when orig_size is enabled
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 13:35:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202410141330.CAF56E3@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0e8d49d2-e89b-44df-9dff-29e8f24de105@suse.cz>

On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 03:12:09PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 10/14/24 14:52, Feng Tang wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 10:53:32AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >> On 10/14/24 09:52, Feng Tang wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 05:52:10PM +0800, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >> > Thanks for the suggestion!
> >> > 
> >> > As there were error report about the NULL slab for big kmalloc object, how
> >> > about the following code for 
> >> > 
> >> > __do_krealloc(const void *p, size_t new_size, gfp_t flags)
> >> > {
> >> > 	void *ret;
> >> > 	size_t ks = 0;
> >> > 	int orig_size = 0;
> >> > 	struct kmem_cache *s = NULL;
> >> > 
> >> > 	/* Check for double-free. */
> >> > 	if (likely(!ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(p))) {
> >> > 		if (!kasan_check_byte(p))
> >> > 			return NULL;
> >> > 
> >> > 		ks = ksize(p);
> >> 
> >> I think this will result in __ksize() doing
> >>   skip_orig_size_check(folio_slab(folio)->slab_cache, object);
> >> and we don't want that?
> > 
> > I think that's fine. As later code will re-set the orig_size anyway.
> 
> But you also read it first.
> 
> >> > 		/* Some objects have no orig_size, like big kmalloc case */
> >> > 		if (is_kfence_address(p)) {
> >> > 			orig_size = kfence_ksize(p);
> >> > 		} else if (virt_to_slab(p)) {
> >> > 			s = virt_to_cache(p);
> >> > 			orig_size = get_orig_size(s, (void *)p);
> 
> here.
> 
> >> > 		}
> 
> >> Also the checks below repeat some of the checks of ksize().
> > 
> > Yes, there is some redundancy, mostly the virt_to_slab() 
> > 
> >> So I think in __do_krealloc() we should do things manually to determine ks
> >> and not call ksize(). Just not break any of the cases ksize() handles
> >> (kfence, large kmalloc).
> > 
> > OK, originally I tried not to expose internals of __ksize(). Let me
> > try this way.
> 
> ksize() makes assumptions that a user outside of slab itself is calling it.
> 
> But we (well mostly Kees) also introduced kmalloc_size_roundup() to avoid
> querying ksize() for the purposes of writing beyond the original
> kmalloc(size) up to the bucket size. So maybe we can also investigate if the
> skip_orig_size_check() mechanism can be removed now?
> 
> Still I think __do_krealloc() should rather do its own thing and not call
> ksize().

The goal was to avoid having users of the allocation APIs change the
sizes of allocations without calling into realloc. This is because
otherwise the "alloc_size" attribute used by compilers inform
__builtin_dynamic_object_size() can get confused:

ptr = alloc(less_than_bucket_size);
...
size = ksize(ptr); /* larger size! */
memcpy(ptr, src, size); /* compiler instrumentation doesn't see that ptr "grows" */

So the callers use kmalloc_size_roundup() to just allocate the rounded
up size immediately. Internally, the allocator can do what it wants.

-- 
Kees Cook


      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-14 20:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-11  6:45 [PATCH v2 0/5] mm/slub: Improve data handling of krealloc() when orig_size is enabled Feng Tang
2024-09-11  6:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mm/kasan: Don't store metadata inside kmalloc object when slub_debug_orig_size is on Feng Tang
2024-09-11  6:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] mm/slub: Consider kfence case for get_orig_size() Feng Tang
2024-09-11  6:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] mm/slub: Move krealloc() and related code to slub.c Feng Tang
2024-09-11  6:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] mm/slub: Improve redzone check and zeroing for krealloc() Feng Tang
2024-09-11  6:45 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] mm/slub, kunit: Add testcase for krealloc redzone and zeroing Feng Tang
2024-10-02 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] mm/slub: Improve data handling of krealloc() when orig_size is enabled Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-04  6:44   ` Marco Elver
2024-10-04  9:18     ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-04  9:52       ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-04 10:28         ` Feng Tang
2024-10-14  7:52         ` Feng Tang
2024-10-14  8:53           ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-14 12:52             ` Feng Tang
2024-10-14 13:12               ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-14 14:20                 ` Feng Tang
2024-10-14 20:40                   ` Kees Cook
2024-11-04 11:28                   ` Feng Tang
2024-11-04 11:45                     ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-11-04 12:37                       ` Feng Tang
2024-10-14 20:35                 ` Kees Cook [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202410141330.CAF56E3@keescook \
    --to=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).