linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Meta kernel team <kernel-team@meta.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/9] memcg: no refilling stock from obj_cgroup_release
Date: Thu,  3 Apr 2025 18:39:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250404013913.1663035-6-shakeel.butt@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250404013913.1663035-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev>

obj_cgroup_release is called when all the references to the objcg have
been released i.e. no more memory objects are pointing to it. Most
probably objcg->memcg will be pointing to some ancestor memcg. In
obj_cgroup_release(), the kernel calls obj_cgroup_uncharge_pages() which
refills the local stock.

There is no need to refill the local stock with some ancestor memcg and
flush the local stock. Let's decouple obj_cgroup_release() from the
local stock by uncharging instead of refilling. One additional benefit
of this change is that it removes the requirement to only call
obj_cgroup_put() outside of local_lock.

Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c | 15 +++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 03a2be6d4a67..df52084e90f4 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -129,8 +129,7 @@ bool mem_cgroup_kmem_disabled(void)
 	return cgroup_memory_nokmem;
 }
 
-static void obj_cgroup_uncharge_pages(struct obj_cgroup *objcg,
-				      unsigned int nr_pages);
+static void memcg_uncharge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages);
 
 static void obj_cgroup_release(struct percpu_ref *ref)
 {
@@ -163,8 +162,16 @@ static void obj_cgroup_release(struct percpu_ref *ref)
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(nr_bytes & (PAGE_SIZE - 1));
 	nr_pages = nr_bytes >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 
-	if (nr_pages)
-		obj_cgroup_uncharge_pages(objcg, nr_pages);
+	if (nr_pages) {
+		struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
+
+		memcg = get_mem_cgroup_from_objcg(objcg);
+		mod_memcg_state(memcg, MEMCG_KMEM, -nr_pages);
+		memcg1_account_kmem(memcg, -nr_pages);
+		if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
+			memcg_uncharge(memcg, nr_pages);
+		mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
+	}
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&objcg_lock, flags);
 	list_del(&objcg->list);
-- 
2.47.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-04-04  1:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-04  1:39 [PATCH v2 0/9] memcg: cleanup per-cpu stock Shakeel Butt
2025-04-04  1:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] memcg: remove root memcg check from refill_stock Shakeel Butt
2025-04-04  1:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] memcg: decouple drain_obj_stock from local stock Shakeel Butt
2025-04-04  1:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] memcg: introduce memcg_uncharge Shakeel Butt
2025-04-04  1:39 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] memcg: manually inline __refill_stock Shakeel Butt
2025-04-04  1:39 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2025-04-04  1:39 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] memcg: do obj_cgroup_put inside drain_obj_stock Shakeel Butt
2025-04-11  8:34   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-04-04  1:39 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] memcg: use __mod_memcg_state in drain_obj_stock Shakeel Butt
2025-04-04  1:39 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] memcg: combine slab obj stock charging and accounting Shakeel Butt
2025-04-04  1:39 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] memcg: manually inline replace_stock_objcg Shakeel Butt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250404013913.1663035-6-shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).