linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/isolation: Introduce isolated task work
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 12:25:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250411102555.GA5322@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250410152327.24504-6-frederic@kernel.org>

I know nothing about this code so I can't review, but let me
ask anyway...

On 04/10, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> +int __isolated_task_work_queue(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (current->flags & PF_KTHREAD)
> +		return -EINVAL;

What about PF_USER_WORKER's ? IIUC, these (in fact kernel) threads
never return to userspace and never call task_work_run().

Or PF_IO_WORKER's, they too run only in kernel mode... But iirc they
do call task_work_run().

> +	local_irq_save(flags);
> +	if (task_work_queued(&current->nohz_full_work)) {
> +		ret = 0;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = task_work_add(current, &current->nohz_full_work, TWA_RESUME);
> +out:
> +	local_irq_restore(flags);
> +	return ret;

Hmm, why not

	local_irq_save(flags);
	if (task_work_queued(...))
		ret = 0;
	else
		ret = task_work_add(...);

?

Oleg.



  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-11 10:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-10 15:23 [PATCH 0/6 v3] sched/mm: LRU drain flush on nohz_full Frederic Weisbecker
2025-04-10 15:23 ` [PATCH 1/6] task_work: Provide means to check if a work is queued Frederic Weisbecker
2025-04-10 15:23 ` [PATCH 2/6] sched/fair: Use task_work_queued() on numa_work Frederic Weisbecker
2025-04-10 15:23 ` [PATCH 3/6] sched: Use task_work_queued() on cid_work Frederic Weisbecker
2025-04-10 15:23 ` [PATCH 4/6] tick/nohz: Move nohz_full related fields out of hot task struct's places Frederic Weisbecker
2025-04-23 18:40   ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-01 12:17     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-04-10 15:23 ` [PATCH 5/6] sched/isolation: Introduce isolated task work Frederic Weisbecker
2025-04-11 10:25   ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2025-04-11 22:00     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-04-12  5:12     ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-10 15:23 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm: Drain LRUs upon resume to userspace on nohz_full CPUs Frederic Weisbecker
     [not found] ` <20250412025831.4010-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-07-01 12:36   ` [PATCH 0/6 v3] sched/mm: LRU drain flush on nohz_full Frederic Weisbecker
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-07-03 14:07 [PATCH 0/6 v4] " Frederic Weisbecker
2025-07-03 14:07 ` [PATCH 5/6] sched/isolation: Introduce isolated task work Frederic Weisbecker
2025-07-17 17:29   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-18  9:52   ` Valentin Schneider
2025-07-18 14:23     ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250411102555.GA5322@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).