From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@samsung.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] nvme/pci: make PRP list DMA pools per-NUMA-node
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 16:12:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250424141249.GA18970@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250422220952.2111584-4-csander@purestorage.com>
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 04:09:52PM -0600, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote:
> NVMe commands with more than 4 KB of data allocate PRP list pages from
> the per-nvme_device dma_pool prp_page_pool or prp_small_pool.
That's not actually true. We can transfer all of the MDTS without a
single pool allocation when using SGLs.
> Each call
> to dma_pool_alloc() and dma_pool_free() takes the per-dma_pool spinlock.
> These device-global spinlocks are a significant source of contention
> when many CPUs are submitting to the same NVMe devices. On a workload
> issuing 32 KB reads from 16 CPUs (8 hypertwin pairs) across 2 NUMA nodes
> to 23 NVMe devices, we observed 2.4% of CPU time spent in
> _raw_spin_lock_irqsave called from dma_pool_alloc and dma_pool_free.
>
> Ideally, the dma_pools would be per-hctx to minimize
> contention. But that could impose considerable resource costs in a
> system with many NVMe devices and CPUs.
Should we try to simply do a slab allocation first and only allocate
from the dmapool when that fails? That should give you all the
scalability from the slab allocator without very little downsides.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-24 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-22 22:09 [PATCH v5 0/3] nvme/pci: PRP list DMA pool partitioning Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-22 22:09 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] dmapool: add NUMA affinity support Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-25 21:44 ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-04-22 22:09 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] nvme/pci: factor out nvme_init_hctx() helper Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-22 22:09 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] nvme/pci: make PRP list DMA pools per-NUMA-node Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-24 14:12 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-04-24 15:40 ` Keith Busch
2025-04-24 15:46 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-25 13:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-25 18:02 ` Keith Busch
2025-04-23 13:21 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] nvme/pci: PRP list DMA pool partitioning Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250424141249.GA18970@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=joshi.k@samsung.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox