* Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] kasan: Avoid sleepable page allocation from atomic context
2025-04-29 16:08 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] " Alexander Gordeev
@ 2025-04-29 23:04 ` Harry Yoo
2025-05-06 12:52 ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-04-30 0:08 ` Andrew Morton
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Harry Yoo @ 2025-04-29 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Gordeev
Cc: Andrew Morton, Andrey Ryabinin, Daniel Axtens, linux-kernel,
linux-mm, kasan-dev, linux-s390, stable
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 06:08:41PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> apply_to_pte_range() enters the lazy MMU mode and then invokes
> kasan_populate_vmalloc_pte() callback on each page table walk
> iteration. However, the callback can go into sleep when trying
> to allocate a single page, e.g. if an architecutre disables
> preemption on lazy MMU mode enter.
Should we add a comment that pte_fn_t must not sleep in
apply_to_pte_range()?
> On s390 if make arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode() -> preempt_enable()
> and arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode() -> preempt_disable(), such crash
> occurs:
>
> [ 553.332108] preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
> [ 553.332117] no locks held by multipathd/2116.
> [ 553.332128] CPU: 24 PID: 2116 Comm: multipathd Kdump: loaded Tainted:
> [ 553.332139] Hardware name: IBM 3931 A01 701 (LPAR)
> [ 553.332146] Call Trace:
> [ 553.332152] [<00000000158de23a>] dump_stack_lvl+0xfa/0x150
> [ 553.332167] [<0000000013e10d12>] __might_resched+0x57a/0x5e8
> [ 553.332178] [<00000000144eb6c2>] __alloc_pages+0x2ba/0x7c0
> [ 553.332189] [<00000000144d5cdc>] __get_free_pages+0x2c/0x88
> [ 553.332198] [<00000000145663f6>] kasan_populate_vmalloc_pte+0x4e/0x110
> [ 553.332207] [<000000001447625c>] apply_to_pte_range+0x164/0x3c8
> [ 553.332218] [<000000001448125a>] apply_to_pmd_range+0xda/0x318
> [ 553.332226] [<000000001448181c>] __apply_to_page_range+0x384/0x768
> [ 553.332233] [<0000000014481c28>] apply_to_page_range+0x28/0x38
> [ 553.332241] [<00000000145665da>] kasan_populate_vmalloc+0x82/0x98
> [ 553.332249] [<00000000144c88d0>] alloc_vmap_area+0x590/0x1c90
> [ 553.332257] [<00000000144ca108>] __get_vm_area_node.constprop.0+0x138/0x260
> [ 553.332265] [<00000000144d17fc>] __vmalloc_node_range+0x134/0x360
> [ 553.332274] [<0000000013d5dbf2>] alloc_thread_stack_node+0x112/0x378
> [ 553.332284] [<0000000013d62726>] dup_task_struct+0x66/0x430
> [ 553.332293] [<0000000013d63962>] copy_process+0x432/0x4b80
> [ 553.332302] [<0000000013d68300>] kernel_clone+0xf0/0x7d0
> [ 553.332311] [<0000000013d68bd6>] __do_sys_clone+0xae/0xc8
> [ 553.332400] [<0000000013d68dee>] __s390x_sys_clone+0xd6/0x118
> [ 553.332410] [<0000000013c9d34c>] do_syscall+0x22c/0x328
> [ 553.332419] [<00000000158e7366>] __do_syscall+0xce/0xf0
> [ 553.332428] [<0000000015913260>] system_call+0x70/0x98
>
> Instead of allocating single pages per-PTE, bulk-allocate the
> shadow memory prior to applying kasan_populate_vmalloc_pte()
> callback on a page range.
>
> Suggested-by: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: 3c5c3cfb9ef4 ("kasan: support backing vmalloc space with real shadow memory")
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> mm/kasan/shadow.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/kasan/shadow.c b/mm/kasan/shadow.c
> index 88d1c9dcb507..ea9a06715a81 100644
> --- a/mm/kasan/shadow.c
> +++ b/mm/kasan/shadow.c
> @@ -292,30 +292,65 @@ void __init __weak kasan_populate_early_vm_area_shadow(void *start,
> {
> }
>
> +struct vmalloc_populate_data {
> + unsigned long start;
> + struct page **pages;
> +};
> +
> static int kasan_populate_vmalloc_pte(pte_t *ptep, unsigned long addr,
> - void *unused)
> + void *_data)
> {
> - unsigned long page;
> + struct vmalloc_populate_data *data = _data;
> + struct page *page;
> + unsigned long pfn;
> pte_t pte;
>
> if (likely(!pte_none(ptep_get(ptep))))
> return 0;
>
> - page = __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!page)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - __memset((void *)page, KASAN_VMALLOC_INVALID, PAGE_SIZE);
> - pte = pfn_pte(PFN_DOWN(__pa(page)), PAGE_KERNEL);
> + page = data->pages[PFN_DOWN(addr - data->start)];
> + pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
> + __memset(pfn_to_virt(pfn), KASAN_VMALLOC_INVALID, PAGE_SIZE);
> + pte = pfn_pte(pfn, PAGE_KERNEL);
>
> spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> - if (likely(pte_none(ptep_get(ptep)))) {
> + if (likely(pte_none(ptep_get(ptep))))
> set_pte_at(&init_mm, addr, ptep, pte);
> - page = 0;
With this patch, now if the pte is already set, the page is leaked?
Should we set data->pages[PFN_DOWN(addr - data->start)] = NULL
and free non-null elements later in __kasan_populate_vmalloc()?
> - }
> spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> - if (page)
> - free_page(page);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __kasan_populate_vmalloc(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> +{
> + unsigned long nr_pages, nr_total = PFN_UP(end - start);
> + struct vmalloc_populate_data data;
> + int ret;
> +
> + data.pages = (struct page **)__get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!data.pages)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + while (nr_total) {
> + nr_pages = min(nr_total, PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(data.pages[0]));
> + __memset(data.pages, 0, nr_pages * sizeof(data.pages[0]));
> + if (nr_pages != alloc_pages_bulk(GFP_KERNEL, nr_pages, data.pages)) {
When the return value of alloc_pages_bulk() is less than nr_pages,
you still need to free pages in the array unless nr_pages is zero.
> + free_page((unsigned long)data.pages);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + data.start = start;
> + ret = apply_to_page_range(&init_mm, start, nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE,
> + kasan_populate_vmalloc_pte, &data);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + start += nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE;
> + nr_total -= nr_pages;
> + }
> +
> + free_page((unsigned long)data.pages);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -348,9 +383,7 @@ int kasan_populate_vmalloc(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
> shadow_start = PAGE_ALIGN_DOWN(shadow_start);
> shadow_end = PAGE_ALIGN(shadow_end);
>
> - ret = apply_to_page_range(&init_mm, shadow_start,
> - shadow_end - shadow_start,
> - kasan_populate_vmalloc_pte, NULL);
> + ret = __kasan_populate_vmalloc(shadow_start, shadow_end);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> --
> 2.45.2
>
>
--
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] kasan: Avoid sleepable page allocation from atomic context
2025-04-29 23:04 ` Harry Yoo
@ 2025-05-06 12:52 ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-05-06 14:55 ` Andrey Ryabinin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Gordeev @ 2025-05-06 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Harry Yoo
Cc: Andrew Morton, Andrey Ryabinin, Daniel Axtens, linux-kernel,
linux-mm, kasan-dev, linux-s390, stable
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 08:04:40AM +0900, Harry Yoo wrote:
Hi Harry,
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 06:08:41PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > apply_to_pte_range() enters the lazy MMU mode and then invokes
> > kasan_populate_vmalloc_pte() callback on each page table walk
> > iteration. However, the callback can go into sleep when trying
> > to allocate a single page, e.g. if an architecutre disables
> > preemption on lazy MMU mode enter.
>
> Should we add a comment that pte_fn_t must not sleep in
> apply_to_pte_range()?
See the comment in include/linux/pgtable.h
"In the general case, no lock is guaranteed to be held between entry and exit
of the lazy mode. So the implementation must assume preemption may be enabled
and cpu migration is possible; it must take steps to be robust against this.
(In practice, for user PTE updates, the appropriate page table lock(s) are
held, but for kernel PTE updates, no lock is held)."
It is Ryan Roberts who brougth some order [1] here, but I would go further
and make things simple by enforcing the kernel PTE updates should also assume
the preemption is disabled.
But that is a separate topic and could only be done once this patch is in.
> > On s390 if make arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode() -> preempt_enable()
> > and arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode() -> preempt_disable(), such crash
> > occurs:
> >
> > [ 553.332108] preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
> > [ 553.332117] no locks held by multipathd/2116.
> > [ 553.332128] CPU: 24 PID: 2116 Comm: multipathd Kdump: loaded Tainted:
> > [ 553.332139] Hardware name: IBM 3931 A01 701 (LPAR)
> > [ 553.332146] Call Trace:
> > [ 553.332152] [<00000000158de23a>] dump_stack_lvl+0xfa/0x150
> > [ 553.332167] [<0000000013e10d12>] __might_resched+0x57a/0x5e8
> > [ 553.332178] [<00000000144eb6c2>] __alloc_pages+0x2ba/0x7c0
> > [ 553.332189] [<00000000144d5cdc>] __get_free_pages+0x2c/0x88
> > [ 553.332198] [<00000000145663f6>] kasan_populate_vmalloc_pte+0x4e/0x110
> > [ 553.332207] [<000000001447625c>] apply_to_pte_range+0x164/0x3c8
> > [ 553.332218] [<000000001448125a>] apply_to_pmd_range+0xda/0x318
> > [ 553.332226] [<000000001448181c>] __apply_to_page_range+0x384/0x768
> > [ 553.332233] [<0000000014481c28>] apply_to_page_range+0x28/0x38
> > [ 553.332241] [<00000000145665da>] kasan_populate_vmalloc+0x82/0x98
> > [ 553.332249] [<00000000144c88d0>] alloc_vmap_area+0x590/0x1c90
> > [ 553.332257] [<00000000144ca108>] __get_vm_area_node.constprop.0+0x138/0x260
> > [ 553.332265] [<00000000144d17fc>] __vmalloc_node_range+0x134/0x360
> > [ 553.332274] [<0000000013d5dbf2>] alloc_thread_stack_node+0x112/0x378
> > [ 553.332284] [<0000000013d62726>] dup_task_struct+0x66/0x430
> > [ 553.332293] [<0000000013d63962>] copy_process+0x432/0x4b80
> > [ 553.332302] [<0000000013d68300>] kernel_clone+0xf0/0x7d0
> > [ 553.332311] [<0000000013d68bd6>] __do_sys_clone+0xae/0xc8
> > [ 553.332400] [<0000000013d68dee>] __s390x_sys_clone+0xd6/0x118
> > [ 553.332410] [<0000000013c9d34c>] do_syscall+0x22c/0x328
> > [ 553.332419] [<00000000158e7366>] __do_syscall+0xce/0xf0
> > [ 553.332428] [<0000000015913260>] system_call+0x70/0x98
> >
> > Instead of allocating single pages per-PTE, bulk-allocate the
> > shadow memory prior to applying kasan_populate_vmalloc_pte()
> > callback on a page range.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Fixes: 3c5c3cfb9ef4 ("kasan: support backing vmalloc space with real shadow memory")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > mm/kasan/shadow.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/kasan/shadow.c b/mm/kasan/shadow.c
> > index 88d1c9dcb507..ea9a06715a81 100644
> > --- a/mm/kasan/shadow.c
> > +++ b/mm/kasan/shadow.c
> > @@ -292,30 +292,65 @@ void __init __weak kasan_populate_early_vm_area_shadow(void *start,
> > {
> > }
> >
> > +struct vmalloc_populate_data {
> > + unsigned long start;
> > + struct page **pages;
> > +};
> > +
> > static int kasan_populate_vmalloc_pte(pte_t *ptep, unsigned long addr,
> > - void *unused)
> > + void *_data)
> > {
> > - unsigned long page;
> > + struct vmalloc_populate_data *data = _data;
> > + struct page *page;
> > + unsigned long pfn;
> > pte_t pte;
> >
> > if (likely(!pte_none(ptep_get(ptep))))
> > return 0;
> >
> > - page = __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL);
> > - if (!page)
> > - return -ENOMEM;
> > -
> > - __memset((void *)page, KASAN_VMALLOC_INVALID, PAGE_SIZE);
> > - pte = pfn_pte(PFN_DOWN(__pa(page)), PAGE_KERNEL);
> > + page = data->pages[PFN_DOWN(addr - data->start)];
> > + pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
> > + __memset(pfn_to_virt(pfn), KASAN_VMALLOC_INVALID, PAGE_SIZE);
> > + pte = pfn_pte(pfn, PAGE_KERNEL);
> >
> > spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> > - if (likely(pte_none(ptep_get(ptep)))) {
> > + if (likely(pte_none(ptep_get(ptep))))
> > set_pte_at(&init_mm, addr, ptep, pte);
> > - page = 0;
>
> With this patch, now if the pte is already set, the page is leaked?
Yes. But currently it is leaked for previously allocated pages anyway,
so no change in behaviour (unless I misread the code).
> Should we set data->pages[PFN_DOWN(addr - data->start)] = NULL
> and free non-null elements later in __kasan_populate_vmalloc()?
Should the allocation fail on boot, the kernel would not fly anyway.
If for whatever reason we want to free, that should be a follow-up
change, as far as I am concerned.
> > - }
> > spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> > - if (page)
> > - free_page(page);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int __kasan_populate_vmalloc(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long nr_pages, nr_total = PFN_UP(end - start);
> > + struct vmalloc_populate_data data;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + data.pages = (struct page **)__get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!data.pages)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + while (nr_total) {
> > + nr_pages = min(nr_total, PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(data.pages[0]));
> > + __memset(data.pages, 0, nr_pages * sizeof(data.pages[0]));
> > + if (nr_pages != alloc_pages_bulk(GFP_KERNEL, nr_pages, data.pages)) {
>
> When the return value of alloc_pages_bulk() is less than nr_pages,
> you still need to free pages in the array unless nr_pages is zero.
Same reasoning for not to free as above.
> > + free_page((unsigned long)data.pages);
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + }
> > +
> > + data.start = start;
> > + ret = apply_to_page_range(&init_mm, start, nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE,
> > + kasan_populate_vmalloc_pte, &data);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + start += nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE;
> > + nr_total -= nr_pages;
> > + }
> > +
> > + free_page((unsigned long)data.pages);
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -348,9 +383,7 @@ int kasan_populate_vmalloc(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
> > shadow_start = PAGE_ALIGN_DOWN(shadow_start);
> > shadow_end = PAGE_ALIGN(shadow_end);
> >
> > - ret = apply_to_page_range(&init_mm, shadow_start,
> > - shadow_end - shadow_start,
> > - kasan_populate_vmalloc_pte, NULL);
> > + ret = __kasan_populate_vmalloc(shadow_start, shadow_end);
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> >
> > --
> > 2.45.2
> >
> >
1. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250303141542.3371656-2-ryan.roberts@arm.com/#t
> --
> Cheers,
> Harry / Hyeonggon
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] kasan: Avoid sleepable page allocation from atomic context
2025-05-06 12:52 ` Alexander Gordeev
@ 2025-05-06 14:55 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2025-05-06 15:11 ` Alexander Gordeev
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Andrey Ryabinin @ 2025-05-06 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Gordeev, Harry Yoo
Cc: Andrew Morton, Daniel Axtens, linux-kernel, linux-mm, kasan-dev,
linux-s390, stable
On 5/6/25 2:52 PM, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 08:04:40AM +0900, Harry Yoo wrote:
>
>>>
>>> +struct vmalloc_populate_data {
>>> + unsigned long start;
>>> + struct page **pages;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> static int kasan_populate_vmalloc_pte(pte_t *ptep, unsigned long addr,
>>> - void *unused)
>>> + void *_data)
>>> {
>>> - unsigned long page;
>>> + struct vmalloc_populate_data *data = _data;
>>> + struct page *page;
>>> + unsigned long pfn;
>>> pte_t pte;
>>>
>>> if (likely(!pte_none(ptep_get(ptep))))
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> - page = __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL);
>>> - if (!page)
>>> - return -ENOMEM;
>>> -
>>> - __memset((void *)page, KASAN_VMALLOC_INVALID, PAGE_SIZE);
>>> - pte = pfn_pte(PFN_DOWN(__pa(page)), PAGE_KERNEL);
>>> + page = data->pages[PFN_DOWN(addr - data->start)];
>>> + pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
>>> + __memset(pfn_to_virt(pfn), KASAN_VMALLOC_INVALID, PAGE_SIZE);
>>> + pte = pfn_pte(pfn, PAGE_KERNEL);
>>>
>>> spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
>>> - if (likely(pte_none(ptep_get(ptep)))) {
>>> + if (likely(pte_none(ptep_get(ptep))))
>>> set_pte_at(&init_mm, addr, ptep, pte);
>>> - page = 0;
>>
>> With this patch, now if the pte is already set, the page is leaked?
>
> Yes. But currently it is leaked for previously allocated pages anyway,
> so no change in behaviour (unless I misread the code).
Current code doesn't even allocate page if pte set, and if set pte discovered only after
taking spinlock, the page will be freed, not leaked.
Whereas, this patch leaks page for every single !pte_none case. This will build up over time
as long as vmalloc called.
>
>> Should we set data->pages[PFN_DOWN(addr - data->start)] = NULL
>> and free non-null elements later in __kasan_populate_vmalloc()?
>
> Should the allocation fail on boot, the kernel would not fly anyway.
This is not boot code, it's called from vmalloc() code path.
> If for whatever reason we want to free, that should be a follow-up
> change, as far as I am concerned.
>
We want to free it, because we don't want unbound memory leak.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] kasan: Avoid sleepable page allocation from atomic context
2025-05-06 14:55 ` Andrey Ryabinin
@ 2025-05-06 15:11 ` Alexander Gordeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Gordeev @ 2025-05-06 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrey Ryabinin
Cc: Harry Yoo, Andrew Morton, Daniel Axtens, linux-kernel, linux-mm,
kasan-dev, linux-s390, stable
On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 04:55:20PM +0200, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> >>> - if (likely(pte_none(ptep_get(ptep)))) {
> >>> + if (likely(pte_none(ptep_get(ptep))))
> >>> set_pte_at(&init_mm, addr, ptep, pte);
> >>> - page = 0;
> >>
> >> With this patch, now if the pte is already set, the page is leaked?
> >
> > Yes. But currently it is leaked for previously allocated pages anyway,
> > so no change in behaviour (unless I misread the code).
>
> Current code doesn't even allocate page if pte set, and if set pte discovered only after
> taking spinlock, the page will be freed, not leaked.
Oh, right. I rather meant pages that are leaked in case of a failure. My bad.
> Whereas, this patch leaks page for every single !pte_none case. This will build up over time
> as long as vmalloc called.
>
> >
> >> Should we set data->pages[PFN_DOWN(addr - data->start)] = NULL
> >> and free non-null elements later in __kasan_populate_vmalloc()?
> >
> > Should the allocation fail on boot, the kernel would not fly anyway.
>
> This is not boot code, it's called from vmalloc() code path.
FWIW, it is called from rest_init() too.
> > If for whatever reason we want to free, that should be a follow-up
> > change, as far as I am concerned.
> >
> We want to free it, because we don't want unbound memory leak.
Will send v5.
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] kasan: Avoid sleepable page allocation from atomic context
2025-04-29 16:08 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] " Alexander Gordeev
2025-04-29 23:04 ` Harry Yoo
@ 2025-04-30 0:08 ` Andrew Morton
2025-05-01 0:51 ` kernel test robot
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2025-04-30 0:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Gordeev
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin, Daniel Axtens, linux-kernel, linux-mm, kasan-dev,
linux-s390, stable
On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 18:08:41 +0200 Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> + __memset(pfn_to_virt(pfn), KASAN_VMALLOC_INVALID, PAGE_SIZE);
pfn_to_virt() exists only in riscv, s390, m68k, loongarch and microblaze.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] kasan: Avoid sleepable page allocation from atomic context
2025-04-29 16:08 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] " Alexander Gordeev
2025-04-29 23:04 ` Harry Yoo
2025-04-30 0:08 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2025-05-01 0:51 ` kernel test robot
2025-05-01 3:22 ` kernel test robot
2025-05-01 9:04 ` kernel test robot
4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2025-05-01 0:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Gordeev, Andrew Morton, Andrey Ryabinin, Daniel Axtens
Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all, Linux Memory Management List, linux-kernel,
kasan-dev, linux-s390, stable
Hi Alexander,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on akpm-mm/mm-everything]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.15-rc4 next-20250430]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Alexander-Gordeev/kasan-Avoid-sleepable-page-allocation-from-atomic-context/20250430-001020
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/573a823565734e1eac3aa128fb9d3506ec918a72.1745940843.git.agordeev%40linux.ibm.com
patch subject: [PATCH v3 1/1] kasan: Avoid sleepable page allocation from atomic context
config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-001-20250501 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250501/202505010807.0tj4Krnz-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 20.1.2 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 58df0ef89dd64126512e4ee27b4ac3fd8ddf6247)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250501/202505010807.0tj4Krnz-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505010807.0tj4Krnz-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> mm/kasan/shadow.c:313:11: error: call to undeclared function 'pfn_to_virt'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
313 | __memset(pfn_to_virt(pfn), KASAN_VMALLOC_INVALID, PAGE_SIZE);
| ^
mm/kasan/shadow.c:313:11: note: did you mean 'fix_to_virt'?
include/asm-generic/fixmap.h:30:38: note: 'fix_to_virt' declared here
30 | static __always_inline unsigned long fix_to_virt(const unsigned int idx)
| ^
>> mm/kasan/shadow.c:313:11: error: incompatible integer to pointer conversion passing 'int' to parameter of type 'void *' [-Wint-conversion]
313 | __memset(pfn_to_virt(pfn), KASAN_VMALLOC_INVALID, PAGE_SIZE);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h:23:22: note: passing argument to parameter 's' here
23 | void *__memset(void *s, int c, size_t n);
| ^
2 errors generated.
vim +/pfn_to_virt +313 mm/kasan/shadow.c
299
300 static int kasan_populate_vmalloc_pte(pte_t *ptep, unsigned long addr,
301 void *_data)
302 {
303 struct vmalloc_populate_data *data = _data;
304 struct page *page;
305 unsigned long pfn;
306 pte_t pte;
307
308 if (likely(!pte_none(ptep_get(ptep))))
309 return 0;
310
311 page = data->pages[PFN_DOWN(addr - data->start)];
312 pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
> 313 __memset(pfn_to_virt(pfn), KASAN_VMALLOC_INVALID, PAGE_SIZE);
314 pte = pfn_pte(pfn, PAGE_KERNEL);
315
316 spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
317 if (likely(pte_none(ptep_get(ptep))))
318 set_pte_at(&init_mm, addr, ptep, pte);
319 spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
320
321 return 0;
322 }
323
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] kasan: Avoid sleepable page allocation from atomic context
2025-04-29 16:08 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] " Alexander Gordeev
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-05-01 0:51 ` kernel test robot
@ 2025-05-01 3:22 ` kernel test robot
2025-05-01 9:04 ` kernel test robot
4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2025-05-01 3:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Gordeev, Andrew Morton, Andrey Ryabinin, Daniel Axtens
Cc: oe-kbuild-all, Linux Memory Management List, linux-kernel,
kasan-dev, linux-s390, stable
Hi Alexander,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-everything]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.15-rc4 next-20250430]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Alexander-Gordeev/kasan-Avoid-sleepable-page-allocation-from-atomic-context/20250430-001020
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/573a823565734e1eac3aa128fb9d3506ec918a72.1745940843.git.agordeev%40linux.ibm.com
patch subject: [PATCH v3 1/1] kasan: Avoid sleepable page allocation from atomic context
config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-002-20250501 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250501/202505010957.08s1jPkF-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250501/202505010957.08s1jPkF-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505010957.08s1jPkF-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
mm/kasan/shadow.c: In function 'kasan_populate_vmalloc_pte':
mm/kasan/shadow.c:313:18: error: implicit declaration of function 'pfn_to_virt'; did you mean 'fix_to_virt'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
313 | __memset(pfn_to_virt(pfn), KASAN_VMALLOC_INVALID, PAGE_SIZE);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
| fix_to_virt
>> mm/kasan/shadow.c:313:18: warning: passing argument 1 of '__memset' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
313 | __memset(pfn_to_virt(pfn), KASAN_VMALLOC_INVALID, PAGE_SIZE);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| int
In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/string.h:5,
from arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid/api.h:10,
from arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h:6,
from arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:19,
from arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:5,
from arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h:59,
from include/linux/thread_info.h:60,
from include/linux/spinlock.h:60,
from arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h:19,
from include/linux/pgtable.h:6,
from include/linux/kasan.h:37,
from mm/kasan/shadow.c:14:
arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h:23:22: note: expected 'void *' but argument is of type 'int'
23 | void *__memset(void *s, int c, size_t n);
| ~~~~~~^
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +/__memset +313 mm/kasan/shadow.c
299
300 static int kasan_populate_vmalloc_pte(pte_t *ptep, unsigned long addr,
301 void *_data)
302 {
303 struct vmalloc_populate_data *data = _data;
304 struct page *page;
305 unsigned long pfn;
306 pte_t pte;
307
308 if (likely(!pte_none(ptep_get(ptep))))
309 return 0;
310
311 page = data->pages[PFN_DOWN(addr - data->start)];
312 pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
> 313 __memset(pfn_to_virt(pfn), KASAN_VMALLOC_INVALID, PAGE_SIZE);
314 pte = pfn_pte(pfn, PAGE_KERNEL);
315
316 spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
317 if (likely(pte_none(ptep_get(ptep))))
318 set_pte_at(&init_mm, addr, ptep, pte);
319 spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
320
321 return 0;
322 }
323
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] kasan: Avoid sleepable page allocation from atomic context
2025-04-29 16:08 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] " Alexander Gordeev
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-05-01 3:22 ` kernel test robot
@ 2025-05-01 9:04 ` kernel test robot
4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2025-05-01 9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Gordeev, Andrew Morton, Andrey Ryabinin, Daniel Axtens
Cc: oe-kbuild-all, Linux Memory Management List, linux-kernel,
kasan-dev, linux-s390, stable
Hi Alexander,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on akpm-mm/mm-everything]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.15-rc4 next-20250430]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Alexander-Gordeev/kasan-Avoid-sleepable-page-allocation-from-atomic-context/20250430-001020
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/573a823565734e1eac3aa128fb9d3506ec918a72.1745940843.git.agordeev%40linux.ibm.com
patch subject: [PATCH v3 1/1] kasan: Avoid sleepable page allocation from atomic context
config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-002-20250501 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250501/202505011646.eHmKdH9T-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250501/202505011646.eHmKdH9T-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505011646.eHmKdH9T-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
mm/kasan/shadow.c: In function 'kasan_populate_vmalloc_pte':
>> mm/kasan/shadow.c:313:18: error: implicit declaration of function 'pfn_to_virt'; did you mean 'fix_to_virt'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
313 | __memset(pfn_to_virt(pfn), KASAN_VMALLOC_INVALID, PAGE_SIZE);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
| fix_to_virt
mm/kasan/shadow.c:313:18: warning: passing argument 1 of '__memset' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
313 | __memset(pfn_to_virt(pfn), KASAN_VMALLOC_INVALID, PAGE_SIZE);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| int
In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/string.h:5,
from arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid/api.h:10,
from arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h:6,
from arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:19,
from arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:5,
from arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h:59,
from include/linux/thread_info.h:60,
from include/linux/spinlock.h:60,
from arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h:19,
from include/linux/pgtable.h:6,
from include/linux/kasan.h:37,
from mm/kasan/shadow.c:14:
arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h:23:22: note: expected 'void *' but argument is of type 'int'
23 | void *__memset(void *s, int c, size_t n);
| ~~~~~~^
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +313 mm/kasan/shadow.c
299
300 static int kasan_populate_vmalloc_pte(pte_t *ptep, unsigned long addr,
301 void *_data)
302 {
303 struct vmalloc_populate_data *data = _data;
304 struct page *page;
305 unsigned long pfn;
306 pte_t pte;
307
308 if (likely(!pte_none(ptep_get(ptep))))
309 return 0;
310
311 page = data->pages[PFN_DOWN(addr - data->start)];
312 pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
> 313 __memset(pfn_to_virt(pfn), KASAN_VMALLOC_INVALID, PAGE_SIZE);
314 pte = pfn_pte(pfn, PAGE_KERNEL);
315
316 spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
317 if (likely(pte_none(ptep_get(ptep))))
318 set_pte_at(&init_mm, addr, ptep, pte);
319 spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
320
321 return 0;
322 }
323
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread