From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>, linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, peterx@redhat.com,
Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] UFFDIO_API.2const: Update userfaultfd handshake and feature probe
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 13:19:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250512171922.356408-2-peterx@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250512171922.356408-1-peterx@redhat.com>
There's a confusing paragraph in the man page on two-steps handshake for
userfaultfd UFFDIO_API ioctl. In reality, after a successful UFFDIO_API
ioctl, the userfaultfd will be locked up on the features and any further
UFFDIO_API on top of an initialized userfaultfd would fail.
Modify the UFFDIO_API(2const) man page to reflect the reality. Instead,
add a paragraph explaining the right way to probe userfaultfd features.
Add that only after the "Before Linux 4.11" paragraph, as the old kernel
doesn't support any feature anyway.
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
man/man2const/UFFDIO_API.2const | 43 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/man/man2const/UFFDIO_API.2const b/man/man2const/UFFDIO_API.2const
index 54b34a1bc..1c554107a 100644
--- a/man/man2const/UFFDIO_API.2const
+++ b/man/man2const/UFFDIO_API.2const
@@ -42,25 +42,6 @@ fields to bit masks representing all the available features and the generic
.BR ioctl (2)
operations available.
.P
-Since Linux 4.11,
-applications should use the
-.I features
-field to perform a two-step handshake.
-First,
-.B UFFDIO_API
-is called with the
-.I features
-field set to zero.
-The kernel responds by setting all supported feature bits.
-.P
-Applications which do not require any specific features
-can begin using the userfaultfd immediately.
-Applications which do need specific features
-should call
-.B UFFDIO_API
-again with a subset of the reported feature bits set
-to enable those features.
-.P
Before Linux 4.11, the
.I features
field must be initialized to zero before the call to
@@ -70,6 +51,30 @@ and zero (i.e., no feature bits) is placed in the
field by the kernel upon return from
.BR ioctl (2).
.P
+Since Linux 4.11,
+userfaultfd supports features that need to be enabled explicitly.
+To enable any of the features,
+one needs to set the corresponding feature bits in
+.I features
+when issuing the
+.B UFFDIO_API
+ioctl.
+.P
+For historical reasons,
+a temporary userfaultfd is needed to probe
+what userfaultfd features the kernel supports.
+The application needs to create a temporary userfaultfd,
+issue an
+.B UFFDIO_API
+ioctl with
+.I features
+set to 0. After the
+.B UFFDIO_API
+ioctl returns successfully,
+.I features
+should contain all the userfaultfd features that the kernel supports.
+The temporary userfaultfd can be safely closed after the probe.
+.P
If the application sets unsupported feature bits,
the kernel will zero out the returned
.I uffdio_api
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-12 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-12 17:19 [PATCH 0/2] UFFDIO_API.2const: Two man page updates Peter Xu
2025-05-12 17:19 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2025-05-13 17:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] UFFDIO_API.2const: Update userfaultfd handshake and feature probe Kyle Huey
2025-05-14 15:59 ` Alejandro Colomar
2025-05-14 17:21 ` Peter Xu
2025-05-14 18:34 ` Alejandro Colomar
2025-05-12 17:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] UFFDIO_API.2const: Add an entry for UFFDIO_MOVE Peter Xu
2025-05-12 17:34 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-05-14 15:02 ` Alejandro Colomar
2025-05-14 17:22 ` Peter Xu
2025-05-14 18:35 ` Alejandro Colomar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250512171922.356408-2-peterx@redhat.com \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=alx@kernel.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=me@kylehuey.com \
--cc=robert@ocallahan.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).