linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
	vbabka@suse.cz, jannh@google.com, pfalcato@suse.de,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	david@redhat.com, peterx@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
	mingo@kernel.org, libang.li@antgroup.com, maobibo@loongson.cn,
	zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com, baohua@kernel.org,
	anshuman.khandual@arm.com, willy@infradead.org,
	ioworker0@gmail.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com,
	baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, ziy@nvidia.com, hughd@google.com,
	Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] mm: Optimize mremap() by PTE batching
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 09:20:43 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250610035043.75448-3-dev.jain@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250610035043.75448-1-dev.jain@arm.com>

Use folio_pte_batch() to optimize move_ptes(). On arm64, if the ptes
are painted with the contig bit, then ptep_get() will iterate through all 16
entries to collect a/d bits. Hence this optimization will result in a 16x
reduction in the number of ptep_get() calls. Next, ptep_get_and_clear()
will eventually call contpte_try_unfold() on every contig block, thus
flushing the TLB for the complete large folio range. Instead, use
get_and_clear_full_ptes() so as to elide TLBIs on each contig block, and only
do them on the starting and ending contig block.

For split folios, there will be no pte batching; nr_ptes will be 1. For
pagetable splitting, the ptes will still point to the same large folio;
for arm64, this results in the optimization described above, and for other
arches (including the general case), a minor improvement is expected due to
a reduction in the number of function calls.

Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
---
 mm/mremap.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/mremap.c b/mm/mremap.c
index 180b12225368..18b215521ada 100644
--- a/mm/mremap.c
+++ b/mm/mremap.c
@@ -170,6 +170,23 @@ static pte_t move_soft_dirty_pte(pte_t pte)
 	return pte;
 }
 
+static int mremap_folio_pte_batch(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
+		pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte, int max_nr)
+{
+	const fpb_t flags = FPB_IGNORE_DIRTY | FPB_IGNORE_SOFT_DIRTY;
+	struct folio *folio;
+
+	if (max_nr == 1)
+		return 1;
+
+	folio = vm_normal_folio(vma, addr, pte);
+	if (!folio || !folio_test_large(folio))
+		return 1;
+
+	return folio_pte_batch(folio, addr, ptep, pte, max_nr, flags, NULL,
+			       NULL, NULL);
+}
+
 static int move_ptes(struct pagetable_move_control *pmc,
 		unsigned long extent, pmd_t *old_pmd, pmd_t *new_pmd)
 {
@@ -177,7 +194,7 @@ static int move_ptes(struct pagetable_move_control *pmc,
 	bool need_clear_uffd_wp = vma_has_uffd_without_event_remap(vma);
 	struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
 	pte_t *old_ptep, *new_ptep;
-	pte_t pte;
+	pte_t old_pte, pte;
 	pmd_t dummy_pmdval;
 	spinlock_t *old_ptl, *new_ptl;
 	bool force_flush = false;
@@ -185,6 +202,8 @@ static int move_ptes(struct pagetable_move_control *pmc,
 	unsigned long new_addr = pmc->new_addr;
 	unsigned long old_end = old_addr + extent;
 	unsigned long len = old_end - old_addr;
+	int max_nr_ptes;
+	int nr_ptes;
 	int err = 0;
 
 	/*
@@ -236,14 +255,16 @@ static int move_ptes(struct pagetable_move_control *pmc,
 	flush_tlb_batched_pending(vma->vm_mm);
 	arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode();
 
-	for (; old_addr < old_end; old_ptep++, old_addr += PAGE_SIZE,
-				   new_ptep++, new_addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
+	for (; old_addr < old_end; old_ptep += nr_ptes, old_addr += nr_ptes * PAGE_SIZE,
+		new_ptep += nr_ptes, new_addr += nr_ptes * PAGE_SIZE) {
 		VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!pte_none(*new_ptep));
 
-		if (pte_none(ptep_get(old_ptep)))
+		nr_ptes = 1;
+		max_nr_ptes = (old_end - old_addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+		old_pte = ptep_get(old_ptep);
+		if (pte_none(old_pte))
 			continue;
 
-		pte = ptep_get_and_clear(mm, old_addr, old_ptep);
 		/*
 		 * If we are remapping a valid PTE, make sure
 		 * to flush TLB before we drop the PTL for the
@@ -255,8 +276,12 @@ static int move_ptes(struct pagetable_move_control *pmc,
 		 * the TLB entry for the old mapping has been
 		 * flushed.
 		 */
-		if (pte_present(pte))
+		if (pte_present(old_pte)) {
+			nr_ptes = mremap_folio_pte_batch(vma, old_addr, old_ptep,
+							 old_pte, max_nr_ptes);
 			force_flush = true;
+		}
+		pte = get_and_clear_full_ptes(mm, old_addr, old_ptep, nr_ptes, 0);
 		pte = move_pte(pte, old_addr, new_addr);
 		pte = move_soft_dirty_pte(pte);
 
@@ -269,7 +294,7 @@ static int move_ptes(struct pagetable_move_control *pmc,
 				else if (is_swap_pte(pte))
 					pte = pte_swp_clear_uffd_wp(pte);
 			}
-			set_pte_at(mm, new_addr, new_ptep, pte);
+			set_ptes(mm, new_addr, new_ptep, pte, nr_ptes);
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
2.30.2



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-10  3:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-10  3:50 [PATCH v4 0/2] Optimize mremap() for large folios Dev Jain
2025-06-10  3:50 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] mm: Call pointers to ptes as ptep Dev Jain
2025-06-11 13:23   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-11 13:25     ` Dev Jain
2025-06-11 13:29       ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-11 13:31         ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-12 12:05   ` Pedro Falcato
2025-06-10  3:50 ` Dev Jain [this message]
2025-06-10  7:03   ` [PATCH v4 2/2] mm: Optimize mremap() by PTE batching Barry Song
2025-06-10  7:44     ` Dev Jain
2025-06-10  8:11       ` Barry Song
2025-06-16 21:27         ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-10  8:37   ` Barry Song
2025-06-10 13:18   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-11 14:00   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-13  4:24     ` Dev Jain
2025-06-17  8:02       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-13 12:32     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-16 16:13       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-12 12:13   ` Pedro Falcato
2025-06-10 12:11 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] Optimize mremap() for large folios Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-10 12:33   ` Dev Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250610035043.75448-3-dev.jain@arm.com \
    --to=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=libang.li@antgroup.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=maobibo@loongson.cn \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).