linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aboorva Devarajan <aboorvad@linux.ibm.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
	lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, shuah@kernel.org, pfalcato@suse.de,
	david@redhat.com, ziy@nvidia.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
	npache@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com,
	baohua@kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, donettom@linux.ibm.com,
	ritesh.list@gmail.com, aboorvad@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] mm/selftests: Fix virtual_address_range test issues.
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 21:36:27 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250616160632.35250-2-aboorvad@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250616160632.35250-1-aboorvad@linux.ibm.com>

From: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>

In this patch, we are fixing three issues in the virtual_address_range
test.

1. validate_addr() checks if the allocated address is within the range.
In the current implementation, if addr is greater than HIGH_ADDR_MARK,
the test fails. However, addr will be greater than HIGH_ADDR_MARK if
high_addr is set. Therefore, if high_addr is set, we should not check
the (addr > HIGH_ADDR_MARK) condition.

2.In main(), the high address is stored in hptr, but for mark_range(),
the address passed is ptr, not hptr. Fixed this by changing ptr[i] to
hptr[i] in mark_range() function call.

3./proc/self/maps may not always have gaps smaller than MAP_CHUNK_SIZE.
The gap between the first high address mapping and the previous mapping
is not smaller than MAP_CHUNK_SIZE.

$cat /proc/3713/maps
10000000-10010000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 36140094
10010000-10020000 r--p 00000000 fd:00 36140094
10020000-10030000 rw-p 00010000 fd:00 36140094
4ee80000-4eeb0000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0
578f0000-57c00000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0
57c00000-7fff97c00000 r--p 00000000 00:00 0
7fff97c00000-7fff97e20000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 33558923
7fff97e20000-7fff97e30000 r--p 00220000 fd:00 33558923
7fff97e30000-7fff97e40000 rw-p 00230000 fd:00 33558923
7fff97f40000-7fff98020000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 33558924
7fff98020000-7fff98030000 r--p 000d0000 fd:00 33558924
7fff98030000-7fff98040000 rw-p 000e0000 fd:00 33558924
7fff98050000-7fff98090000 r--p 00000000 00:00 0
7fff98090000-7fff980a0000 r-xp 00000000 00:00 0
7fff980a0000-7fff980f0000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 2634
7fff980f0000-7fff98100000 r--p 00040000 fd:00 2634
7fff98100000-7fff98110000 rw-p 00050000 fd:00 2634
7fffcf8a0000-7fffcf9b0000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0
1000000000000-1000040000000 r--p 00000000 00:00 0   --> High Addr
2000000000000-2000040000000 r--p 00000000 00:00 0
4000000000000-4000040000000 r--p 00000000 00:00 0
8000000000000-8000040000000 r--p 00000000 00:00 0
e800098110000-fffff98110000 r--p 00000000 00:00 0
$

In this patch, the condition that checks for gaps smaller than MAP_CHUNK_SIZE has been removed.

Fixes: d1d86ce28d0f ("selftests/mm: virtual_address_range: conform to TAP format output")
Fixes: b2a79f62133a ("selftests/mm: virtual_address_range: unmap chunks after validation")
Fixes: 010409649885 ("selftests/mm: confirm VA exhaustion without reliance on correctness of mmap()")
Signed-off-by: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Aboorva Devarajan <aboorvad@linux.ibm.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/mm/virtual_address_range.c | 14 +++-----------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/virtual_address_range.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/virtual_address_range.c
index b380e102b22f..606e601a8984 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/virtual_address_range.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/virtual_address_range.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static void validate_addr(char *ptr, int high_addr)
 	if (high_addr && addr < HIGH_ADDR_MARK)
 		ksft_exit_fail_msg("Bad address %lx\n", addr);
 
-	if (addr > HIGH_ADDR_MARK)
+	if (!high_addr && addr > HIGH_ADDR_MARK)
 		ksft_exit_fail_msg("Bad address %lx\n", addr);
 }
 
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static int validate_lower_address_hint(void)
 
 static int validate_complete_va_space(void)
 {
-	unsigned long start_addr, end_addr, prev_end_addr;
+	unsigned long start_addr, end_addr;
 	char line[400];
 	char prot[6];
 	FILE *file;
@@ -134,7 +134,6 @@ static int validate_complete_va_space(void)
 	if (file == NULL)
 		ksft_exit_fail_msg("cannot open /proc/self/maps\n");
 
-	prev_end_addr = 0;
 	while (fgets(line, sizeof(line), file)) {
 		const char *vma_name = NULL;
 		int vma_name_start = 0;
@@ -151,12 +150,6 @@ static int validate_complete_va_space(void)
 		if (start_addr & (1UL << 63))
 			return 0;
 
-		/* /proc/self/maps must have gaps less than MAP_CHUNK_SIZE */
-		if (start_addr - prev_end_addr >= MAP_CHUNK_SIZE)
-			return 1;
-
-		prev_end_addr = end_addr;
-
 		if (prot[0] != 'r')
 			continue;
 
@@ -223,8 +216,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 
 		if (hptr[i] == MAP_FAILED)
 			break;
-
-		mark_range(ptr[i], MAP_CHUNK_SIZE);
+		mark_range(hptr[i], MAP_CHUNK_SIZE);
 		validate_addr(hptr[i], 1);
 	}
 	hchunks = i;
-- 
2.43.5



  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-16 16:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-16 16:06 [PATCH 0/6] selftests/mm: Fix false positives and skip unsupported tests Aboorva Devarajan
2025-06-16 16:06 ` Aboorva Devarajan [this message]
2025-06-16 16:27   ` [PATCH 1/6] mm/selftests: Fix virtual_address_range test issues Dev Jain
2025-06-18 10:06     ` Donet Tom
2025-06-18 10:35       ` Dev Jain
2025-06-18 11:22     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-18 11:28       ` Dev Jain
2025-06-18 11:37         ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-18 11:45           ` Dev Jain
2025-06-18 11:57             ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-18 11:59               ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-18 13:58               ` Dev Jain
2025-06-18 14:07                 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-18 14:17                   ` Dev Jain
2025-06-18 14:35                     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-18 14:43                       ` Dev Jain
2025-06-19  8:23                         ` Donet Tom
2025-06-19  9:02                           ` Dev Jain
2025-06-19 15:31                             ` Donet Tom
2025-06-19 16:14                               ` Dev Jain
2025-06-20 14:45                           ` Dev Jain
2025-06-21 17:55                             ` Donet Tom
2025-06-23  4:53                               ` Dev Jain
2025-06-23  4:55                                 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-23 17:32                                 ` Donet Tom
2025-06-24  6:15                                   ` Dev Jain
2025-06-25  9:36                                     ` Donet Tom
2025-06-25 10:45                                       ` Dev Jain
2025-06-25 12:52                           ` Dev Jain
2025-06-25 17:17                             ` Donet Tom
2025-06-26  3:57                               ` Dev Jain
2025-06-26  5:42                                 ` Donet Tom
2025-06-26  5:55                                   ` Dev Jain
2025-06-26  6:35                                   ` Dev Jain
2025-06-26  6:52                                     ` Donet Tom
2025-06-18 11:50           ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-16 16:06 ` [PATCH 2/6] selftest/mm: Fix ksm_funtional_test failures Aboorva Devarajan
2025-06-16 17:04   ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-06-17 15:10     ` donettom
2025-06-16 16:06 ` [PATCH 3/6] selftests/mm : fix test_prctl_fork_exec failure Aboorva Devarajan
2025-06-16 16:28   ` Dev Jain
2025-06-17 15:04     ` donettom
2025-06-16 16:06 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm/selftests: Fix split_huge_page_test failure on systems with 64KB page size Aboorva Devarajan
2025-06-16 16:06 ` [PATCH 5/6] selftests/mm: Fix child process exit codes in KSM tests Aboorva Devarajan
2025-06-16 16:06 ` [PATCH 6/6] selftests/mm: Mark thuge-gen as skipped if shmmax is too small or no 1G pages Aboorva Devarajan
2025-06-16 16:11 ` [PATCH 0/6] selftests/mm: Fix false positives and skip unsupported tests Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-17  7:53   ` Aboorva Devarajan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250616160632.35250-2-aboorvad@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=aboorvad@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=donettom@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=npache@redhat.com \
    --cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).