From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: ankita@nvidia.com
Cc: maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev, joey.gouly@arm.com,
suzuki.poulose@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
shahuang@redhat.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org, david@redhat.com,
ddutile@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com, aniketa@nvidia.com,
cjia@nvidia.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com, kjaju@nvidia.com,
targupta@nvidia.com, vsethi@nvidia.com, acurrid@nvidia.com,
apopple@nvidia.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com, danw@nvidia.com,
zhiw@nvidia.com, mochs@nvidia.com, udhoke@nvidia.com,
dnigam@nvidia.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
sebastianene@google.com, coltonlewis@google.com,
kevin.tian@intel.com, yi.l.liu@intel.com, ardb@kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, gshan@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
tabba@google.com, qperret@google.com, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, maobibo@loongson.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/6] KVM: arm64: Allow cacheable stage 2 mapping using VMA flags
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 09:20:16 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250620122016.GD17127@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250620120946.2991-6-ankita@nvidia.com>
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 12:09:45PM +0000, ankita@nvidia.com wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index d8d2eb8a409e..48a5402706c3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -1683,16 +1683,62 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
>
> if (vm_flags & (VM_PFNMAP | VM_MIXEDMAP) && !pfn_is_map_memory(pfn)) {
> /*
> - * If the page was identified as device early by looking at
> - * the VMA flags, vma_pagesize is already representing the
> - * largest quantity we can map. If instead it was mapped
> - * via __kvm_faultin_pfn(), vma_pagesize is set to PAGE_SIZE
> - * and must not be upgraded.
> - *
> - * In both cases, we don't let transparent_hugepage_adjust()
> - * change things at the last minute.
> + * This is non-struct page memory PFN, and cannot support
> + * CMOs. It could potentially be unsafe to access as cachable.
> */
> - s2_force_noncacheable = true;
> + bool cacheable_pfnmap = false;
> +
> + if (vm_flags & VM_PFNMAP) {
I think this same logic works equally well for MIXEDMAP. A cachable
MIXEDMAP should follow the same rules for PFNMAP for the non-normal
pages within it. IOW, just remove this if, it was already done above.
> + /*
> + * COW VM_PFNMAP is possible when doing a MAP_PRIVATE
> + * /dev/mem mapping on systems that allow such mapping.
> + * Reject such case.
> + */
This is where a COW mapping come from, but it doesn't explain why KVM
has a problem here?
> + if (is_cow_mapping(vm_flags))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /*
> + * Check if the VMA owner considers the physical address
> + * safe to be mapped cacheable.
> + */
> + if (is_vma_cacheable)
> + cacheable_pfnmap = true;
> + }
> +
> + if (cacheable_pfnmap) {
If the vm_flags test is removed then this is just is_vma_cacheable
> + /*
> + * Whilst the VMA owner expects cacheable mapping to this
> + * PFN, hardware also has to support the FWB and CACHE DIC
> + * features.
> + *
> + * ARM64 KVM relies on kernel VA mapping to the PFN to
> + * perform cache maintenance as the CMO instructions work on
> + * virtual addresses. VM_PFNMAP region are not necessarily
> + * mapped to a KVA and hence the presence of hardware features
> + * S2FWB and CACHE DIC is mandatory for cache maintenance.
"are mandatory to avoid any cache maintenance"
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-20 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-20 12:09 [PATCH v8 0/6] KVM: arm64: Map GPU device memory as cacheable ankita
2025-06-20 12:09 ` [PATCH v8 1/6] KVM: arm64: Rename the device variable to s2_force_noncacheable ankita
2025-06-20 12:09 ` [PATCH v8 2/6] KVM: arm64: Update the check to detect device memory ankita
2025-06-20 12:09 ` [PATCH v8 3/6] KVM: arm64: Block cacheable PFNMAP mapping ankita
2025-06-20 12:09 ` [PATCH v8 4/6] KVM: arm64: New function to determine hardware cache management support ankita
2025-06-20 12:09 ` [PATCH v8 5/6] KVM: arm64: Allow cacheable stage 2 mapping using VMA flags ankita
2025-06-20 12:20 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2025-06-20 13:07 ` Ankit Agrawal
2025-06-20 12:09 ` [PATCH v8 6/6] KVM: arm64: Expose new KVM cap for cacheable PFNMAP ankita
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250620122016.GD17127@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=acurrid@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=aniketa@nvidia.com \
--cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
--cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
--cc=danw@nvidia.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=dnigam@nvidia.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kjaju@nvidia.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=maobibo@loongson.cn \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mochs@nvidia.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=sebastianene@google.com \
--cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=targupta@nvidia.com \
--cc=udhoke@nvidia.com \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
--cc=zhiw@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).