From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] mm/madvise: eliminate very confusing manipulation of prev VMA
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 11:10:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250620181044.96643-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <63d281c5df2e64225ab5b4bda398b45e22818701.1750433500.git.lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 16:33:05 +0100 Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com> wrote:
> The madvise code has for the longest time had very confusing code around
> the 'prev' VMA pointer passed around various functions which, in all cases
> except madvise_update_vma(), is unused and instead simply updated as soon
> as the function is invoked.
>
> To compound the confusion, the prev pointer is also used to indicate to the
> caller that the mmap lock has been dropped and that we can therefore not
> safely access the end of the current VMA (which might have been updated by
> madvise_update_vma()).
>
> Clear up this confusion by not setting prev = vma anywhere except in
> madvise_walk_vmas(), update all references to prev which will always be
> equal to vma after madvise_vma_behavior() is invoked, and adding a flag to
> indicate that the lock has been dropped to make this explicit.
>
> Additionally, drop a redundant BUG_ON() from madvise_collapse(), which is
> simply reiterating the BUG_ON(mmap_locked) above it (note that BUG_ON() is
> not appropriate here, but we leave existing code as-is).
>
> We finally adjust the madvise_walk_vmas() logic to be a little clearer -
> delaying the assignment of the end of the range to the start of the new
> range until the last moment and handling the lock being dropped scenario
> immediately.
>
> Additionally add some explanatory comments.
>
> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-20 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-20 15:33 [PATCH v2 0/5] madvise cleanup Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-20 15:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mm/madvise: remove the visitor pattern and thread anon_vma state Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-20 16:57 ` Zi Yan
2025-06-20 17:12 ` SeongJae Park
2025-06-23 22:38 ` Barry Song
2025-06-25 7:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-20 15:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] mm/madvise: thread mm_struct through madvise_behavior Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-20 16:59 ` Zi Yan
2025-06-20 17:25 ` SeongJae Park
2025-06-23 22:42 ` Barry Song
2025-06-20 15:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] mm/madvise: thread VMA range state " Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-20 17:02 ` Zi Yan
2025-06-20 17:33 ` SeongJae Park
2025-06-24 1:05 ` Barry Song
2025-06-20 15:33 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] mm/madvise: thread all madvise state through madv_behavior Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-20 17:56 ` SeongJae Park
2025-06-20 18:01 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-20 18:12 ` SeongJae Park
2025-06-20 15:33 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] mm/madvise: eliminate very confusing manipulation of prev VMA Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-20 17:13 ` Zi Yan
2025-06-20 18:10 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2025-06-24 13:16 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-24 17:57 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-06-24 18:01 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-20 17:21 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] madvise cleanup SeongJae Park
2025-06-20 17:33 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250620181044.96643-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).