linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>,
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
	Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] mm/madvise: eliminate very confusing manipulation of prev VMA
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 11:10:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250620181044.96643-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <63d281c5df2e64225ab5b4bda398b45e22818701.1750433500.git.lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>

On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 16:33:05 +0100 Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com> wrote:

> The madvise code has for the longest time had very confusing code around
> the 'prev' VMA pointer passed around various functions which, in all cases
> except madvise_update_vma(), is unused and instead simply updated as soon
> as the function is invoked.
> 
> To compound the confusion, the prev pointer is also used to indicate to the
> caller that the mmap lock has been dropped and that we can therefore not
> safely access the end of the current VMA (which might have been updated by
> madvise_update_vma()).
> 
> Clear up this confusion by not setting prev = vma anywhere except in
> madvise_walk_vmas(), update all references to prev which will always be
> equal to vma after madvise_vma_behavior() is invoked, and adding a flag to
> indicate that the lock has been dropped to make this explicit.
> 
> Additionally, drop a redundant BUG_ON() from madvise_collapse(), which is
> simply reiterating the BUG_ON(mmap_locked) above it (note that BUG_ON() is
> not appropriate here, but we leave existing code as-is).
> 
> We finally adjust the madvise_walk_vmas() logic to be a little clearer -
> delaying the assignment of the end of the range to the start of the new
> range until the last moment and handling the lock being dropped scenario
> immediately.
> 
> Additionally add some explanatory comments.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>

Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>


Thanks,
SJ

[...]


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-20 18:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-20 15:33 [PATCH v2 0/5] madvise cleanup Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-20 15:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mm/madvise: remove the visitor pattern and thread anon_vma state Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-20 16:57   ` Zi Yan
2025-06-20 17:12   ` SeongJae Park
2025-06-23 22:38   ` Barry Song
2025-06-25  7:43   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-20 15:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] mm/madvise: thread mm_struct through madvise_behavior Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-20 16:59   ` Zi Yan
2025-06-20 17:25   ` SeongJae Park
2025-06-23 22:42   ` Barry Song
2025-06-20 15:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] mm/madvise: thread VMA range state " Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-20 17:02   ` Zi Yan
2025-06-20 17:33   ` SeongJae Park
2025-06-24  1:05   ` Barry Song
2025-06-20 15:33 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] mm/madvise: thread all madvise state through madv_behavior Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-20 17:56   ` SeongJae Park
2025-06-20 18:01     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-20 18:12       ` SeongJae Park
2025-06-20 15:33 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] mm/madvise: eliminate very confusing manipulation of prev VMA Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-20 17:13   ` Zi Yan
2025-06-20 18:10   ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2025-06-24 13:16   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-24 17:57     ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-06-24 18:01       ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-20 17:21 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] madvise cleanup SeongJae Park
2025-06-20 17:33   ` Lorenzo Stoakes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250620181044.96643-1-sj@kernel.org \
    --to=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=npache@redhat.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).