From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Gavin Guo <gavinguo@igalia.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/5] mm,hugetlb: rename anon_rmap to new_anon_folio and make it boolean
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 16:42:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250630144212.156938-4-osalvador@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250630144212.156938-1-osalvador@suse.de>
anon_rmap is used to determine whether the new allocated folio is
anonymous. Rename it to something more meaningul like new_anon_folio and
make it boolean, as we use it like that.
While we are at it, drop 'new_pagecache_folio' as 'new_anon_folio' is
enough to check whether we need to restore the consumed reservation.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250627102904.107202-4-osalvador@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Gavin Guo <gavinguo@igalia.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/hugetlb.c | 19 +++++++++----------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 31d39e2a0879..67f3c9c16348 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -6424,17 +6424,16 @@ static bool hugetlb_pte_stable(struct hstate *h, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned
static vm_fault_t hugetlb_no_page(struct address_space *mapping,
struct vm_fault *vmf)
{
+ u32 hash = hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(mapping, vmf->pgoff);
+ bool new_folio, new_anon_folio = false;
struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
struct hstate *h = hstate_vma(vma);
vm_fault_t ret = VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
- int anon_rmap = 0;
- unsigned long size;
+ bool folio_locked = true;
struct folio *folio;
+ unsigned long size;
pte_t new_pte;
- bool new_folio, new_pagecache_folio = false;
- u32 hash = hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(mapping, vmf->pgoff);
- bool folio_locked = true;
/*
* Currently, we are forced to kill the process in the event the
@@ -6533,10 +6532,9 @@ static vm_fault_t hugetlb_no_page(struct address_space *mapping,
ret = VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
goto out;
}
- new_pagecache_folio = true;
} else {
+ new_anon_folio = true;
folio_lock(folio);
- anon_rmap = 1;
}
} else {
/*
@@ -6585,7 +6583,7 @@ static vm_fault_t hugetlb_no_page(struct address_space *mapping,
if (!pte_same(huge_ptep_get(mm, vmf->address, vmf->pte), vmf->orig_pte))
goto backout;
- if (anon_rmap)
+ if (new_anon_folio)
hugetlb_add_new_anon_rmap(folio, vma, vmf->address);
else
hugetlb_add_file_rmap(folio);
@@ -6604,7 +6602,7 @@ static vm_fault_t hugetlb_no_page(struct address_space *mapping,
* No need to keep file folios locked. See comment in
* hugetlb_fault().
*/
- if (!anon_rmap) {
+ if (!new_anon_folio) {
folio_locked = false;
folio_unlock(folio);
}
@@ -6640,7 +6638,8 @@ static vm_fault_t hugetlb_no_page(struct address_space *mapping,
backout:
spin_unlock(vmf->ptl);
backout_unlocked:
- if (new_folio && !new_pagecache_folio)
+ /* We only need to restore reservations for private mappings */
+ if (new_anon_folio)
restore_reserve_on_error(h, vma, vmf->address, folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
--
2.50.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-30 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-30 14:42 [PATCH v4 0/5] Misc rework on hugetlb faulting path Oscar Salvador
2025-06-30 14:42 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] mm,hugetlb: change mechanism to detect a COW on private mapping Oscar Salvador
2025-06-30 14:42 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] mm,hugetlb: sort out folio locking in the faulting path Oscar Salvador
2025-07-04 10:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-30 14:42 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2025-07-04 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] mm,hugetlb: rename anon_rmap to new_anon_folio and make it boolean David Hildenbrand
2025-06-30 14:42 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] mm,hugetlb: drop obsolete comment about non-present pte and second faults Oscar Salvador
2025-07-04 10:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-30 14:42 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] mm,hugetlb: drop unlikelys from hugetlb_fault Oscar Salvador
2025-07-04 10:47 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250630144212.156938-4-osalvador@suse.de \
--to=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gavinguo@igalia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).