From: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC 5/7] mm/vmalloc: Defer freeing partly initialized vm_struct
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 17:25:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250704152537.55724-6-urezki@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250704152537.55724-1-urezki@gmail.com>
__vmalloc_area_node() may call free_vmap_area() or vfree() on
error paths, both of which can sleep. This becomes problematic
if the function is invoked from an atomic context, such as when
GFP_ATOMIC or GFP_NOWAIT is passed via gfp_mask.
To fix this, unify error paths and defer the cleanup of partly
initialized vm_struct objects to a workqueue. This ensures that
freeing happens in a process context and avoids invalid sleeps
in atomic regions.
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
---
mm/vmalloc.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 5bac15b09b03..2eaff0575a9e 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -3677,6 +3677,36 @@ vm_area_alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp, int nid,
return nr_allocated;
}
+static LLIST_HEAD(pending_vm_area_cleanup);
+
+static void cleanup_vm_area_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct llist_node *node, *next;
+ struct vm_struct *vm;
+
+ llist_for_each_safe(node, next, llist_del_all(&pending_vm_area_cleanup)) {
+ vm = (void *) node - offsetof(struct vm_struct, next);
+
+ if (!vm->nr_pages)
+ free_vm_area(vm);
+ else
+ vfree(vm->addr);
+ }
+}
+
+static DECLARE_WORK(cleanup_vm_area, cleanup_vm_area_work);
+
+/*
+ * Helper for __vmalloc_area_node() to defer cleanup
+ * of partially initialized vm_struct in error paths.
+ */
+static void
+defer_vm_area_cleanup(struct vm_struct *area)
+{
+ if (llist_add((struct llist_node *) &area->next, &pending_vm_area_cleanup))
+ schedule_work(&cleanup_vm_area);
+}
+
static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct vm_struct *area, gfp_t gfp_mask,
pgprot_t prot, unsigned int page_shift,
int node)
@@ -3708,8 +3738,7 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct vm_struct *area, gfp_t gfp_mask,
warn_alloc(gfp_mask, NULL,
"vmalloc error: size %lu, failed to allocated page array size %lu",
nr_small_pages * PAGE_SIZE, array_size);
- free_vm_area(area);
- return NULL;
+ goto fail;
}
set_vm_area_page_order(area, page_shift - PAGE_SHIFT);
@@ -3786,7 +3815,7 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct vm_struct *area, gfp_t gfp_mask,
return area->addr;
fail:
- vfree(area->addr);
+ defer_vm_area_cleanup(area);
return NULL;
}
--
2.39.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-04 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-04 15:25 [RFC 0/7] vmallloc and non-blocking GFPs Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-07-04 15:25 ` [RFC 1/7] lib/test_vmalloc: Add non-block-alloc-test case Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-07-08 5:59 ` [External] " Adrian Huang12
2025-07-08 8:29 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-07-04 15:25 ` [RFC 2/7] mm/vmalloc: Support non-blocking GFP flags in alloc_vmap_area() Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-07-07 7:11 ` Michal Hocko
2025-07-08 12:34 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-07-08 15:17 ` Michal Hocko
2025-07-08 16:45 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-07-04 15:25 ` [RFC 3/7] mm/vmalloc: Avoid cond_resched() when blocking is not permitted Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-07-07 7:11 ` Michal Hocko
2025-07-08 12:29 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-07-04 15:25 ` [RFC 4/7] mm/kasan, mm/vmalloc: Respect GFP flags in kasan_populate_vmalloc() Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-07-07 1:47 ` Baoquan He
2025-07-08 1:15 ` Baoquan He
2025-07-08 8:30 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-07-04 15:25 ` Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) [this message]
2025-07-04 15:25 ` [RFC 6/7] mm/vmalloc: Support non-blocking GFP flags in __vmalloc_area_node() Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-07-07 7:13 ` Michal Hocko
2025-07-08 12:27 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-07-08 15:22 ` Michal Hocko
2025-07-09 11:20 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-07-08 15:47 ` Michal Hocko
2025-07-09 13:45 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-07-04 15:25 ` [RFC 7/7] mm: Drop __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM flag if PF_MEMALLOC is set Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250704152537.55724-6-urezki@gmail.com \
--to=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).