From: Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com>
To: <seanjc@google.com>, <david@redhat.com>, <vbabka@suse.cz>,
<willy@infradead.org>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
<shuah@kernel.org>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>, <brauner@kernel.org>,
<viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: <ackerleytng@google.com>, <paul@paul-moore.com>,
<jmorris@namei.org>, <serge@hallyn.com>, <pvorel@suse.cz>,
<bfoster@redhat.com>, <tabba@google.com>, <vannapurve@google.com>,
<chao.gao@intel.com>, <bharata@amd.com>, <nikunj@amd.com>,
<michael.day@amd.com>, <shdhiman@amd.com>, <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>,
<Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>, <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
<michael.roth@amd.com>, <aik@amd.com>, <jgg@nvidia.com>,
<kalyazin@amazon.com>, <peterx@redhat.com>, <shivankg@amd.com>,
<jack@suse.cz>, <rppt@kernel.org>, <hch@infradead.org>,
<cgzones@googlemail.com>, <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
<rientjes@google.com>, <roypat@amazon.co.uk>, <ziy@nvidia.com>,
<matthew.brost@intel.com>, <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>,
<rakie.kim@sk.com>, <byungchul@sk.com>, <gourry@gourry.net>,
<kent.overstreet@linux.dev>, <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>,
<apopple@nvidia.com>, <chao.p.peng@intel.com>,
<amit@infradead.org>, <ddutile@redhat.com>,
<dan.j.williams@intel.com>, <ashish.kalra@amd.com>,
<gshan@redhat.com>, <jgowans@amazon.com>, <pankaj.gupta@amd.com>,
<papaluri@amd.com>, <yuzhao@google.com>, <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
<quic_eberman@quicinc.com>, <aneeshkumar.kizhakeveetil@arm.com>,
<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-coco@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH V9 7/7] KVM: guest_memfd: selftests: Add tests for mmap and NUMA policy support
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2025 17:43:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250713174339.13981-10-shivankg@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250713174339.13981-2-shivankg@amd.com>
Add tests for NUMA memory policy binding and NUMA aware allocation in
guest_memfd. This extends the existing selftests by adding proper
validation for:
- KVM GMEM set_policy and get_policy() vm_ops functionality using
mbind() and get_mempolicy()
- NUMA policy application before and after memory allocation
These tests help ensure NUMA support for guest_memfd works correctly.
Signed-off-by: Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm | 1 +
.../testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c | 122 +++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
index e11ed9e59ab5..f4bb02231d6a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
@@ -273,6 +273,7 @@ pgste-option = $(call try-run, echo 'int main(void) { return 0; }' | \
$(CC) -Werror -Wl$(comma)--s390-pgste -x c - -o "$$TMP",-Wl$(comma)--s390-pgste)
LDLIBS += -ldl
+LDLIBS += -lnuma
LDFLAGS += -pthread $(no-pie-option) $(pgste-option)
LIBKVM_C := $(filter %.c,$(LIBKVM))
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c
index 1252e74fbb8f..d8f3beccd5a0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c
@@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
+#include <numa.h>
+#include <numaif.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
@@ -18,6 +20,7 @@
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
+#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include "kvm_util.h"
#include "test_util.h"
@@ -115,6 +118,122 @@ static void test_mmap_not_supported(int fd, size_t page_size, size_t total_size)
TEST_ASSERT_EQ(mem, MAP_FAILED);
}
+#define TEST_REQUIRE_NUMA_MULTIPLE_NODES() \
+ TEST_REQUIRE(numa_available() != -1 && numa_max_node() >= 1)
+
+static void test_mbind(int fd, size_t page_size, size_t total_size)
+{
+ unsigned long nodemask = 1; /* nid: 0 */
+ unsigned long maxnode = 8;
+ unsigned long get_nodemask;
+ int get_policy;
+ char *mem;
+ int ret;
+
+ TEST_REQUIRE_NUMA_MULTIPLE_NODES();
+
+ mem = mmap(NULL, total_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
+ TEST_ASSERT(mem != MAP_FAILED, "mmap for mbind test should succeed");
+
+ /* Test MPOL_INTERLEAVE policy */
+ ret = syscall(__NR_mbind, mem, page_size * 2, MPOL_INTERLEAVE,
+ &nodemask, maxnode, 0);
+ TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "mbind with INTERLEAVE to node 0 should succeed");
+ ret = syscall(__NR_get_mempolicy, &get_policy, &get_nodemask,
+ maxnode, mem, MPOL_F_ADDR);
+ TEST_ASSERT(!ret && get_policy == MPOL_INTERLEAVE && get_nodemask == nodemask,
+ "Policy should be MPOL_INTERLEAVE and nodes match");
+
+ /* Test basic MPOL_BIND policy */
+ ret = syscall(__NR_mbind, mem + page_size * 2, page_size * 2, MPOL_BIND,
+ &nodemask, maxnode, 0);
+ TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "mbind with MPOL_BIND to node 0 should succeed");
+ ret = syscall(__NR_get_mempolicy, &get_policy, &get_nodemask,
+ maxnode, mem + page_size * 2, MPOL_F_ADDR);
+ TEST_ASSERT(!ret && get_policy == MPOL_BIND && get_nodemask == nodemask,
+ "Policy should be MPOL_BIND and nodes match");
+
+ /* Test MPOL_DEFAULT policy */
+ ret = syscall(__NR_mbind, mem, total_size, MPOL_DEFAULT, NULL, 0, 0);
+ TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "mbind with MPOL_DEFAULT should succeed");
+ ret = syscall(__NR_get_mempolicy, &get_policy, &get_nodemask,
+ maxnode, mem, MPOL_F_ADDR);
+ TEST_ASSERT(!ret && get_policy == MPOL_DEFAULT && get_nodemask == 0,
+ "Policy should be MPOL_DEFAULT and nodes zero");
+
+ /* Test with invalid policy */
+ ret = syscall(__NR_mbind, mem, page_size, 999, &nodemask, maxnode, 0);
+ TEST_ASSERT(ret == -1 && errno == EINVAL,
+ "mbind with invalid policy should fail with EINVAL");
+
+ TEST_ASSERT(munmap(mem, total_size) == 0, "munmap should succeed");
+}
+
+static void test_numa_allocation(int fd, size_t page_size, size_t total_size)
+{
+ unsigned long node0_mask = 1; /* Node 0 */
+ unsigned long node1_mask = 2; /* Node 1 */
+ unsigned long maxnode = 8;
+ void *pages[4];
+ int status[4];
+ char *mem;
+ int ret, i;
+
+ TEST_REQUIRE_NUMA_MULTIPLE_NODES();
+
+ /* Clean slate: deallocate all file space, if any */
+ ret = fallocate(fd, FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE | FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE, 0, total_size);
+ TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "fallocate(PUNCH_HOLE) should succeed");
+
+ mem = mmap(NULL, total_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
+ TEST_ASSERT(mem != MAP_FAILED, "mmap should succeed");
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
+ pages[i] = (char *)mem + page_size * i;
+
+ /* Set NUMA policy after allocation */
+ memset(mem, 0xaa, page_size);
+ ret = syscall(__NR_mbind, pages[0], page_size, MPOL_BIND, &node0_mask, maxnode, 0);
+ TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "mbind after allocation page 0 to node 0 should succeed");
+ ret = fallocate(fd, FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE | FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE, 0, page_size);
+ TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "fallocate(PUNCH_HOLE) should succeed");
+
+ /* Set NUMA policy before allocation */
+ ret = syscall(__NR_mbind, pages[0], page_size * 2, MPOL_BIND, &node1_mask, maxnode, 0);
+ TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "mbind page 0, 1 to node 1 should succeed");
+ ret = syscall(__NR_mbind, pages[2], page_size * 2, MPOL_BIND, &node0_mask, maxnode, 0);
+ TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "mbind page 2, 3 to node 0 should succeed");
+ memset(mem, 0xaa, total_size);
+
+ /* Validate if pages are allocated on specified NUMA nodes */
+ ret = syscall(__NR_move_pages, 0, 4, pages, NULL, status, 0);
+ TEST_ASSERT(ret >= 0, "move_pages should succeed for status check");
+ TEST_ASSERT(status[0] == 1, "Page 0 should be allocated on node 1");
+ TEST_ASSERT(status[1] == 1, "Page 1 should be allocated on node 1");
+ TEST_ASSERT(status[2] == 0, "Page 2 should be allocated on node 0");
+ TEST_ASSERT(status[3] == 0, "Page 3 should be allocated on node 0");
+
+ /* Punch hole for all pages */
+ ret = fallocate(fd, FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE | FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE, 0, total_size);
+ TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "fallocate(PUNCH_HOLE) should succeed");
+
+ /* Change NUMA policy nodes and reallocate */
+ ret = syscall(__NR_mbind, pages[0], page_size * 2, MPOL_BIND, &node0_mask, maxnode, 0);
+ TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "mbind page 0, 1 to node 0 should succeed");
+ ret = syscall(__NR_mbind, pages[2], page_size * 2, MPOL_BIND, &node1_mask, maxnode, 0);
+ TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "mbind page 2, 3 to node 1 should succeed");
+ memset(mem, 0xaa, total_size);
+
+ ret = syscall(__NR_move_pages, 0, 4, pages, NULL, status, 0);
+ TEST_ASSERT(ret >= 0, "move_pages should succeed after reallocation");
+ TEST_ASSERT(status[0] == 0, "Page 0 should be allocated on node 0");
+ TEST_ASSERT(status[1] == 0, "Page 1 should be allocated on node 0");
+ TEST_ASSERT(status[2] == 1, "Page 2 should be allocated on node 1");
+ TEST_ASSERT(status[3] == 1, "Page 3 should be allocated on node 1");
+
+ TEST_ASSERT(munmap(mem, total_size) == 0, "munmap should succeed");
+}
+
static void test_file_size(int fd, size_t page_size, size_t total_size)
{
struct stat sb;
@@ -275,7 +394,8 @@ static void test_with_type(unsigned long vm_type, uint64_t guest_memfd_flags,
if (expect_mmap_allowed) {
test_mmap_supported(fd, page_size, total_size);
test_fault_overflow(fd, page_size, total_size);
-
+ test_mbind(fd, page_size, total_size);
+ test_numa_allocation(fd, page_size, total_size);
} else {
test_mmap_not_supported(fd, page_size, total_size);
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-13 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-13 17:43 [PATCH V9 0/7] Add NUMA mempolicy support for KVM guest-memfd Shivank Garg
2025-07-13 17:43 ` [PATCH V9 1/7] KVM: guest_memfd: Use guest mem inodes instead of anonymous inodes Shivank Garg
2025-07-22 15:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-07 21:34 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-08-07 22:14 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-08-11 8:02 ` Garg, Shivank
2025-07-13 17:43 ` [PATCH V9 2/7] mm/filemap: Add NUMA mempolicy support to filemap_alloc_folio() Shivank Garg
2025-07-22 15:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-13 17:43 ` [PATCH V9 3/7] mm/filemap: Extend __filemap_get_folio() to support NUMA memory policies Shivank Garg
2025-07-22 15:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-13 17:43 ` [PATCH V9 4/7] mm/mempolicy: Export memory policy symbols Shivank Garg
2025-07-13 17:43 ` [PATCH V9 5/7] KVM: guest_memfd: Add slab-allocated inode cache Shivank Garg
2025-07-21 11:44 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-22 5:03 ` Shivank Garg
2025-07-13 17:43 ` [PATCH V9 6/7] KVM: guest_memfd: Enforce NUMA mempolicy using shared policy Shivank Garg
2025-07-21 13:30 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-22 15:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-13 17:43 ` Shivank Garg [this message]
2025-07-22 14:40 ` [PATCH V9 0/7] Add NUMA mempolicy support for KVM guest-memfd David Hildenbrand
2025-07-22 14:45 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-07-22 15:51 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-22 23:07 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-07-23 8:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-22 15:49 ` Shivank Garg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250713174339.13981-10-shivankg@amd.com \
--to=shivankg@amd.com \
--cc=Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amit@infradead.org \
--cc=aneeshkumar.kizhakeveetil@arm.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=bharata@amd.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=byungchul@sk.com \
--cc=cgzones@googlemail.com \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jgowans@amazon.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--cc=kalyazin@amazon.com \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=michael.day@amd.com \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=nikunj@amd.com \
--cc=pankaj.gupta@amd.com \
--cc=papaluri@amd.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=quic_eberman@quicinc.com \
--cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roypat@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=shdhiman@amd.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).