From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] selftests/mm: assert rmap behave as expected
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 08:27:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250716082710.2801-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com> (raw)
As David suggested, currently we don't have a high level test case to
verify the behavior of rmap. This patch set introduce the verification
on rmap by migration.
Patch 1 is a trivial cleanup.
Patch 2 is a preparation to move ksm related operation into vm_util.
Patch 3 is the new test case.
Currently it covers following four scenarios:
* anonymous page
* shmem page
* pagecache page
* ksm page
RFC->v1:
* open file in function itself instead of pass fd as paremeter
* fault in the region by accessing it instead of print content
Wei Yang (3):
selftests/mm: check a valid fd with negative value
selftests/mm: put general ksm operation into vm_util
selftests/mm: assert rmap behave as expected
MAINTAINERS | 1 +
tools/testing/selftests/mm/.gitignore | 1 +
tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile | 3 +
.../selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c | 95 +---
tools/testing/selftests/mm/rmap.c | 470 ++++++++++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh | 4 +
tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c | 111 +++++
tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.h | 7 +
8 files changed, 605 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/mm/rmap.c
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-07-16 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-16 8:27 Wei Yang [this message]
2025-07-16 8:27 ` [PATCH 1/3] selftests/mm: check a valid fd with negative value Wei Yang
2025-07-16 8:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-17 1:18 ` Wei Yang
2025-07-17 8:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-16 8:27 ` [PATCH 2/3] selftests/mm: put general ksm operation into vm_util Wei Yang
2025-07-16 9:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-17 2:45 ` Wei Yang
2025-07-17 3:30 ` Wei Yang
2025-07-17 11:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-17 11:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-16 8:27 ` [PATCH 3/3] selftests/mm: assert rmap behave as expected Wei Yang
2025-07-16 13:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-17 3:17 ` Wei Yang
2025-07-25 2:16 ` Wei Yang
2025-07-25 13:34 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250716082710.2801-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--to=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).