From: Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: willy@infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel_team@skhynix.com,
almasrymina@google.com, ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org,
harry.yoo@oracle.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, asml.silence@gmail.com, toke@redhat.com,
david@redhat.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
vishal.moola@gmail.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, ziy@nvidia.com,
jackmanb@google.com, wei.fang@nxp.com, shenwei.wang@nxp.com,
xiaoning.wang@nxp.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v11 12/12] libeth: xdp: access ->pp through netmem_desc instead of page
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 09:43:46 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250718004346.GA38833@system.software.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202507180111.jygqJHzk-lkp@intel.com>
On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 01:42:38AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Byungchul,
>
> kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
>
> [auto build test WARNING on c65d34296b2252897e37835d6007bbd01b255742]
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Byungchul-Park/netmem-introduce-struct-netmem_desc-mirroring-struct-page/20250717-150253
> base: c65d34296b2252897e37835d6007bbd01b255742
> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250717070052.6358-13-byungchul%40sk.com
> patch subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v11 12/12] libeth: xdp: access ->pp through netmem_desc instead of page
> config: arm-randconfig-r072-20250717 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250718/202507180111.jygqJHzk-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 8.5.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250718/202507180111.jygqJHzk-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202507180111.jygqJHzk-lkp@intel.com/
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> In file included from include/linux/container_of.h:5,
> from include/linux/list.h:5,
> from include/linux/timer.h:5,
> from include/linux/netdevice.h:24,
> from include/trace/events/xdp.h:8,
> from include/linux/bpf_trace.h:5,
> from include/net/libeth/xdp.h:7,
> from drivers/net/ethernet/intel/libeth/tx.c:6:
> include/net/libeth/xdp.h: In function 'libeth_xdp_prepare_buff':
> >> include/net/libeth/xdp.h:1295:23: warning: passing argument 1 of 'page_pool_page_is_pp' discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
> pp_page_to_nmdesc(page)->pp->p.offset, len, true);
> ^~~~
> include/linux/build_bug.h:30:63: note: in definition of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID'
> #define BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID(e) ((void)(sizeof((__force long)(e))))
> ^
> include/net/netmem.h:301:2: note: in expansion of macro 'DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE'
> DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(!page_pool_page_is_pp(p)); \
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/net/libeth/xdp.h:1295:5: note: in expansion of macro 'pp_page_to_nmdesc'
> pp_page_to_nmdesc(page)->pp->p.offset, len, true);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from arch/arm/include/asm/cacheflush.h:10,
> from include/linux/cacheflush.h:5,
> from include/linux/highmem.h:8,
> from include/linux/bvec.h:10,
> from include/linux/skbuff.h:17,
> from include/net/net_namespace.h:43,
> from include/linux/netdevice.h:38,
> from include/trace/events/xdp.h:8,
> from include/linux/bpf_trace.h:5,
> from include/net/libeth/xdp.h:7,
> from drivers/net/ethernet/intel/libeth/tx.c:6:
> include/linux/mm.h:4176:54: note: expected 'struct page *' but argument is of type 'const struct page *'
> static inline bool page_pool_page_is_pp(struct page *page)
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
Oh. page_pool_page_is_pp() in the mainline code already has this issue
that the helper cannot take const struct page * as argument.
How should we resolve the issue? Changing page_pool_page_is_pp() to
macro and using _Generic again looks too much. Or should we? Any idea?
Byungchul
> vim +1295 include/net/libeth/xdp.h
>
> 1263
> 1264 bool libeth_xdp_buff_add_frag(struct libeth_xdp_buff *xdp,
> 1265 const struct libeth_fqe *fqe,
> 1266 u32 len);
> 1267
> 1268 /**
> 1269 * libeth_xdp_prepare_buff - fill &libeth_xdp_buff with head FQE data
> 1270 * @xdp: XDP buffer to attach the head to
> 1271 * @fqe: FQE containing the head buffer
> 1272 * @len: buffer len passed from HW
> 1273 *
> 1274 * Internal, use libeth_xdp_process_buff() instead. Initializes XDP buffer
> 1275 * head with the Rx buffer data: data pointer, length, headroom, and
> 1276 * truesize/tailroom. Zeroes the flags.
> 1277 * Uses faster single u64 write instead of per-field access.
> 1278 */
> 1279 static inline void libeth_xdp_prepare_buff(struct libeth_xdp_buff *xdp,
> 1280 const struct libeth_fqe *fqe,
> 1281 u32 len)
> 1282 {
> 1283 const struct page *page = __netmem_to_page(fqe->netmem);
> 1284
> 1285 #ifdef __LIBETH_WORD_ACCESS
> 1286 static_assert(offsetofend(typeof(xdp->base), flags) -
> 1287 offsetof(typeof(xdp->base), frame_sz) ==
> 1288 sizeof(u64));
> 1289
> 1290 *(u64 *)&xdp->base.frame_sz = fqe->truesize;
> 1291 #else
> 1292 xdp_init_buff(&xdp->base, fqe->truesize, xdp->base.rxq);
> 1293 #endif
> 1294 xdp_prepare_buff(&xdp->base, page_address(page) + fqe->offset,
> > 1295 pp_page_to_nmdesc(page)->pp->p.offset, len, true);
> 1296 }
> 1297
>
> --
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-18 0:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-17 7:00 [PATCH net-next v11 00/12] Split netmem from struct page Byungchul Park
2025-07-17 7:00 ` [PATCH net-next v11 01/12] netmem: introduce struct netmem_desc mirroring " Byungchul Park
2025-07-17 7:00 ` [PATCH net-next v11 02/12] netmem: use netmem_desc instead of page to access ->pp in __netmem_get_pp() Byungchul Park
2025-07-17 7:00 ` [PATCH net-next v11 03/12] netmem, mlx4: access ->pp_ref_count through netmem_desc instead of page Byungchul Park
2025-07-17 7:00 ` [PATCH net-next v11 04/12] netdevsim: access ->pp " Byungchul Park
2025-07-17 7:00 ` [PATCH net-next v11 05/12] mt76: " Byungchul Park
2025-07-17 7:00 ` [PATCH net-next v11 06/12] net: fec: " Byungchul Park
2025-07-17 7:00 ` [PATCH net-next v11 07/12] octeontx2-pf: " Byungchul Park
2025-07-17 7:00 ` [PATCH net-next v11 08/12] iavf: " Byungchul Park
2025-07-17 7:00 ` [PATCH net-next v11 09/12] idpf: " Byungchul Park
2025-07-17 7:00 ` [PATCH net-next v11 10/12] mlx5: " Byungchul Park
2025-07-17 7:00 ` [PATCH net-next v11 11/12] net: ti: icssg-prueth: " Byungchul Park
2025-07-17 7:00 ` [PATCH net-next v11 12/12] libeth: xdp: " Byungchul Park
2025-07-17 17:42 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " kernel test robot
2025-07-18 0:43 ` Byungchul Park [this message]
2025-07-18 1:14 ` Byungchul Park
2025-07-18 9:18 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-07-18 9:32 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-07-21 1:03 ` Byungchul Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250718004346.GA38833@system.software.com \
--to=byungchul@sk.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=almasrymina@google.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=kernel_team@skhynix.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shenwei.wang@nxp.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vishal.moola@gmail.com \
--cc=wei.fang@nxp.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xiaoning.wang@nxp.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).