linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] RDMA/siw: Fix the sendmsg byte count in siw_tcp_sendpages
@ 2025-07-29 12:03 Pedro Falcato
  2025-07-29 18:53 ` Bernard Metzler
  2025-08-05 14:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pedro Falcato @ 2025-07-29 12:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason Gunthorpe, Bernard Metzler, Leon Romanovsky,
	Vlastimil Babka
  Cc: Jakub Kicinski, David Howells, Tom Talpey, linux-rdma,
	linux-kernel, linux-mm, torvalds, Pedro Falcato, stable,
	kernel test robot

Ever since commit c2ff29e99a76 ("siw: Inline do_tcp_sendpages()"),
we have been doing this:

static int siw_tcp_sendpages(struct socket *s, struct page **page, int offset,
                             size_t size)
[...]
        /* Calculate the number of bytes we need to push, for this page
         * specifically */
        size_t bytes = min_t(size_t, PAGE_SIZE - offset, size);
        /* If we can't splice it, then copy it in, as normal */
        if (!sendpage_ok(page[i]))
                msg.msg_flags &= ~MSG_SPLICE_PAGES;
        /* Set the bvec pointing to the page, with len $bytes */
        bvec_set_page(&bvec, page[i], bytes, offset);
        /* Set the iter to $size, aka the size of the whole sendpages (!!!) */
        iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, &bvec, 1, size);
try_page_again:
        lock_sock(sk);
        /* Sendmsg with $size size (!!!) */
        rv = tcp_sendmsg_locked(sk, &msg, size);

This means we've been sending oversized iov_iters and tcp_sendmsg calls
for a while. This has a been a benign bug because sendpage_ok() always
returned true. With the recent slab allocator changes being slowly
introduced into next (that disallow sendpage on large kmalloc
allocations), we have recently hit out-of-bounds crashes, due to slight
differences in iov_iter behavior between the MSG_SPLICE_PAGES and
"regular" copy paths:

(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES)
skb_splice_from_iter
  iov_iter_extract_pages
    iov_iter_extract_bvec_pages
      uses i->nr_segs to correctly stop in its tracks before OoB'ing everywhere
  skb_splice_from_iter gets a "short" read

(!MSG_SPLICE_PAGES)
skb_copy_to_page_nocache copy=iov_iter_count
 [...]
   copy_from_iter
        /* this doesn't help */
        if (unlikely(iter->count < len))
                len = iter->count;
          iterate_bvec
            ... and we run off the bvecs

Fix this by properly setting the iov_iter's byte count, plus sending the
correct byte count to tcp_sendmsg_locked.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: c2ff29e99a76 ("siw: Inline do_tcp_sendpages()")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202507220801.50a7210-lkp@intel.com
Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>
---

v2:
 - Add David Howells's Rb on the original patch
 - Remove the offset increment, since it's dead code

 drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c
index 3a08f57d2211..f7dd32c6e5ba 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c
@@ -340,18 +340,17 @@ static int siw_tcp_sendpages(struct socket *s, struct page **page, int offset,
 		if (!sendpage_ok(page[i]))
 			msg.msg_flags &= ~MSG_SPLICE_PAGES;
 		bvec_set_page(&bvec, page[i], bytes, offset);
-		iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, &bvec, 1, size);
+		iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, &bvec, 1, bytes);
 
 try_page_again:
 		lock_sock(sk);
-		rv = tcp_sendmsg_locked(sk, &msg, size);
+		rv = tcp_sendmsg_locked(sk, &msg, bytes);
 		release_sock(sk);
 
 		if (rv > 0) {
 			size -= rv;
 			sent += rv;
 			if (rv != bytes) {
-				offset += rv;
 				bytes -= rv;
 				goto try_page_again;
 			}
-- 
2.50.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] RDMA/siw: Fix the sendmsg byte count in siw_tcp_sendpages
  2025-07-29 12:03 [PATCH v2] RDMA/siw: Fix the sendmsg byte count in siw_tcp_sendpages Pedro Falcato
@ 2025-07-29 18:53 ` Bernard Metzler
  2025-07-30  9:26   ` Pedro Falcato
  2025-08-05 14:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bernard Metzler @ 2025-07-29 18:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pedro Falcato, Jason Gunthorpe, Leon Romanovsky, Vlastimil Babka
  Cc: Jakub Kicinski, David Howells, Tom Talpey, linux-rdma,
	linux-kernel, linux-mm, torvalds, stable, kernel test robot

On 29.07.2025 14:03, Pedro Falcato wrote:
> Ever since commit c2ff29e99a76 ("siw: Inline do_tcp_sendpages()"),
> we have been doing this:
>
> static int siw_tcp_sendpages(struct socket *s, struct page **page, int offset,
>                               size_t size)
> [...]
>          /* Calculate the number of bytes we need to push, for this page
>           * specifically */
>          size_t bytes = min_t(size_t, PAGE_SIZE - offset, size);
>          /* If we can't splice it, then copy it in, as normal */
>          if (!sendpage_ok(page[i]))
>                  msg.msg_flags &= ~MSG_SPLICE_PAGES;
>          /* Set the bvec pointing to the page, with len $bytes */
>          bvec_set_page(&bvec, page[i], bytes, offset);
>          /* Set the iter to $size, aka the size of the whole sendpages (!!!) */
>          iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, &bvec, 1, size);
> try_page_again:
>          lock_sock(sk);
>          /* Sendmsg with $size size (!!!) */
>          rv = tcp_sendmsg_locked(sk, &msg, size);
>
> This means we've been sending oversized iov_iters and tcp_sendmsg calls
> for a while. This has a been a benign bug because sendpage_ok() always
> returned true. With the recent slab allocator changes being slowly
> introduced into next (that disallow sendpage on large kmalloc
> allocations), we have recently hit out-of-bounds crashes, due to slight
> differences in iov_iter behavior between the MSG_SPLICE_PAGES and
> "regular" copy paths:
>
> (MSG_SPLICE_PAGES)
> skb_splice_from_iter
>    iov_iter_extract_pages
>      iov_iter_extract_bvec_pages
>        uses i->nr_segs to correctly stop in its tracks before OoB'ing everywhere
>    skb_splice_from_iter gets a "short" read
>
> (!MSG_SPLICE_PAGES)
> skb_copy_to_page_nocache copy=iov_iter_count
>   [...]
>     copy_from_iter
>          /* this doesn't help */
>          if (unlikely(iter->count < len))
>                  len = iter->count;
>            iterate_bvec
>              ... and we run off the bvecs
>
> Fix this by properly setting the iov_iter's byte count, plus sending the
> correct byte count to tcp_sendmsg_locked.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: c2ff29e99a76 ("siw: Inline do_tcp_sendpages()")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202507220801.50a7210-lkp@intel.com
> Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>
> ---
>
> v2:
>   - Add David Howells's Rb on the original patch
>   - Remove the offset increment, since it's dead code
>
>   drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c | 5 ++---
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c
> index 3a08f57d2211..f7dd32c6e5ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c
> @@ -340,18 +340,17 @@ static int siw_tcp_sendpages(struct socket *s, struct page **page, int offset,
>   		if (!sendpage_ok(page[i]))
>   			msg.msg_flags &= ~MSG_SPLICE_PAGES;
>   		bvec_set_page(&bvec, page[i], bytes, offset);
> -		iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, &bvec, 1, size);
> +		iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, &bvec, 1, bytes);
>   
>   try_page_again:
>   		lock_sock(sk);
> -		rv = tcp_sendmsg_locked(sk, &msg, size);
> +		rv = tcp_sendmsg_locked(sk, &msg, bytes)
>   		release_sock(sk);
>   
>   		if (rv > 0) {
>   			size -= rv;
>   			sent += rv;
>   			if (rv != bytes) {
> -				offset += rv;
>   				bytes -= rv;
>   				goto try_page_again;
>   			}

Acked-by: Bernard Metzler <bernard.metzler@linux.dev>



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] RDMA/siw: Fix the sendmsg byte count in siw_tcp_sendpages
  2025-07-29 18:53 ` Bernard Metzler
@ 2025-07-30  9:26   ` Pedro Falcato
  2025-07-31 20:19     ` Bernard Metzler
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pedro Falcato @ 2025-07-30  9:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bernard Metzler
  Cc: Jason Gunthorpe, Leon Romanovsky, Vlastimil Babka, Jakub Kicinski,
	David Howells, Tom Talpey, linux-rdma, linux-kernel, linux-mm,
	torvalds, stable, kernel test robot

On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 08:53:02PM +0200, Bernard Metzler wrote:
> On 29.07.2025 14:03, Pedro Falcato wrote:
> > Ever since commit c2ff29e99a76 ("siw: Inline do_tcp_sendpages()"),
> > we have been doing this:
> > 
> > static int siw_tcp_sendpages(struct socket *s, struct page **page, int offset,
> >                               size_t size)
> > [...]
> >          /* Calculate the number of bytes we need to push, for this page
> >           * specifically */
> >          size_t bytes = min_t(size_t, PAGE_SIZE - offset, size);
> >          /* If we can't splice it, then copy it in, as normal */
> >          if (!sendpage_ok(page[i]))
> >                  msg.msg_flags &= ~MSG_SPLICE_PAGES;
> >          /* Set the bvec pointing to the page, with len $bytes */
> >          bvec_set_page(&bvec, page[i], bytes, offset);
> >          /* Set the iter to $size, aka the size of the whole sendpages (!!!) */
> >          iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, &bvec, 1, size);
> > try_page_again:
> >          lock_sock(sk);
> >          /* Sendmsg with $size size (!!!) */
> >          rv = tcp_sendmsg_locked(sk, &msg, size);
> > 
> > This means we've been sending oversized iov_iters and tcp_sendmsg calls
> > for a while. This has a been a benign bug because sendpage_ok() always
> > returned true. With the recent slab allocator changes being slowly
> > introduced into next (that disallow sendpage on large kmalloc
> > allocations), we have recently hit out-of-bounds crashes, due to slight
> > differences in iov_iter behavior between the MSG_SPLICE_PAGES and
> > "regular" copy paths:
> > 
> > (MSG_SPLICE_PAGES)
> > skb_splice_from_iter
> >    iov_iter_extract_pages
> >      iov_iter_extract_bvec_pages
> >        uses i->nr_segs to correctly stop in its tracks before OoB'ing everywhere
> >    skb_splice_from_iter gets a "short" read
> > 
> > (!MSG_SPLICE_PAGES)
> > skb_copy_to_page_nocache copy=iov_iter_count
> >   [...]
> >     copy_from_iter
> >          /* this doesn't help */
> >          if (unlikely(iter->count < len))
> >                  len = iter->count;
> >            iterate_bvec
> >              ... and we run off the bvecs
> > 
> > Fix this by properly setting the iov_iter's byte count, plus sending the
> > correct byte count to tcp_sendmsg_locked.
> > 
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Fixes: c2ff29e99a76 ("siw: Inline do_tcp_sendpages()")
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202507220801.50a7210-lkp@intel.com
> > Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>
> > ---
> > 
> > v2:
> >   - Add David Howells's Rb on the original patch
> >   - Remove the offset increment, since it's dead code
> > 
> >   drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c | 5 ++---
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c
> > index 3a08f57d2211..f7dd32c6e5ba 100644
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c
> > @@ -340,18 +340,17 @@ static int siw_tcp_sendpages(struct socket *s, struct page **page, int offset,
> >   		if (!sendpage_ok(page[i]))
> >   			msg.msg_flags &= ~MSG_SPLICE_PAGES;
> >   		bvec_set_page(&bvec, page[i], bytes, offset);
> > -		iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, &bvec, 1, size);
> > +		iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, &bvec, 1, bytes);
> >   try_page_again:
> >   		lock_sock(sk);
> > -		rv = tcp_sendmsg_locked(sk, &msg, size);
> > +		rv = tcp_sendmsg_locked(sk, &msg, bytes)
> >   		release_sock(sk);
> >   		if (rv > 0) {
> >   			size -= rv;
> >   			sent += rv;
> >   			if (rv != bytes) {
> > -				offset += rv;
> >   				bytes -= rv;
> >   				goto try_page_again;
> >   			}
> 
> Acked-by: Bernard Metzler <bernard.metzler@linux.dev>


Thanks!

Do you want to take the fix through your tree? Otherwise I suspect Vlastimil
could simply take it (and possibly resubmit the SLAB PR, which hasn't been
merged yet).

-- 
Pedro


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] RDMA/siw: Fix the sendmsg byte count in siw_tcp_sendpages
  2025-07-30  9:26   ` Pedro Falcato
@ 2025-07-31 20:19     ` Bernard Metzler
  2025-08-01  8:12       ` Vlastimil Babka
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bernard Metzler @ 2025-07-31 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pedro Falcato
  Cc: Jason Gunthorpe, Leon Romanovsky, Vlastimil Babka, Jakub Kicinski,
	David Howells, Tom Talpey, linux-rdma, linux-kernel, linux-mm,
	torvalds, stable, kernel test robot

On 30.07.2025 11:26, Pedro Falcato wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 08:53:02PM +0200, Bernard Metzler wrote:
>> On 29.07.2025 14:03, Pedro Falcato wrote:
>>> Ever since commit c2ff29e99a76 ("siw: Inline do_tcp_sendpages()"),
>>> we have been doing this:
>>>
>>> static int siw_tcp_sendpages(struct socket *s, struct page **page, int offset,
>>>                                size_t size)
>>> [...]
>>>           /* Calculate the number of bytes we need to push, for this page
>>>            * specifically */
>>>           size_t bytes = min_t(size_t, PAGE_SIZE - offset, size);
>>>           /* If we can't splice it, then copy it in, as normal */
>>>           if (!sendpage_ok(page[i]))
>>>                   msg.msg_flags &= ~MSG_SPLICE_PAGES;
>>>           /* Set the bvec pointing to the page, with len $bytes */
>>>           bvec_set_page(&bvec, page[i], bytes, offset);
>>>           /* Set the iter to $size, aka the size of the whole sendpages (!!!) */
>>>           iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, &bvec, 1, size);
>>> try_page_again:
>>>           lock_sock(sk);
>>>           /* Sendmsg with $size size (!!!) */
>>>           rv = tcp_sendmsg_locked(sk, &msg, size);
>>>
>>> This means we've been sending oversized iov_iters and tcp_sendmsg calls
>>> for a while. This has a been a benign bug because sendpage_ok() always
>>> returned true. With the recent slab allocator changes being slowly
>>> introduced into next (that disallow sendpage on large kmalloc
>>> allocations), we have recently hit out-of-bounds crashes, due to slight
>>> differences in iov_iter behavior between the MSG_SPLICE_PAGES and
>>> "regular" copy paths:
>>>
>>> (MSG_SPLICE_PAGES)
>>> skb_splice_from_iter
>>>     iov_iter_extract_pages
>>>       iov_iter_extract_bvec_pages
>>>         uses i->nr_segs to correctly stop in its tracks before OoB'ing everywhere
>>>     skb_splice_from_iter gets a "short" read
>>>
>>> (!MSG_SPLICE_PAGES)
>>> skb_copy_to_page_nocache copy=iov_iter_count
>>>    [...]
>>>      copy_from_iter
>>>           /* this doesn't help */
>>>           if (unlikely(iter->count < len))
>>>                   len = iter->count;
>>>             iterate_bvec
>>>               ... and we run off the bvecs
>>>
>>> Fix this by properly setting the iov_iter's byte count, plus sending the
>>> correct byte count to tcp_sendmsg_locked.
>>>
>>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>>> Fixes: c2ff29e99a76 ("siw: Inline do_tcp_sendpages()")
>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
>>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202507220801.50a7210-lkp@intel.com
>>> Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> v2:
>>>    - Add David Howells's Rb on the original patch
>>>    - Remove the offset increment, since it's dead code
>>>
>>>    drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c | 5 ++---
>>>    1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c
>>> index 3a08f57d2211..f7dd32c6e5ba 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c
>>> @@ -340,18 +340,17 @@ static int siw_tcp_sendpages(struct socket *s, struct page **page, int offset,
>>>    		if (!sendpage_ok(page[i]))
>>>    			msg.msg_flags &= ~MSG_SPLICE_PAGES;
>>>    		bvec_set_page(&bvec, page[i], bytes, offset);
>>> -		iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, &bvec, 1, size);
>>> +		iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, &bvec, 1, bytes);
>>>    try_page_again:
>>>    		lock_sock(sk);
>>> -		rv = tcp_sendmsg_locked(sk, &msg, size);
>>> +		rv = tcp_sendmsg_locked(sk, &msg, bytes)
>>>    		release_sock(sk);
>>>    		if (rv > 0) {
>>>    			size -= rv;
>>>    			sent += rv;
>>>    			if (rv != bytes) {
>>> -				offset += rv;
>>>    				bytes -= rv;
>>>    				goto try_page_again;
>>>    			}
>> Acked-by: Bernard Metzler <bernard.metzler@linux.dev>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Do you want to take the fix through your tree? Otherwise I suspect Vlastimil
> could simply take it (and possibly resubmit the SLAB PR, which hasn't been
> merged yet).
>
Thanks Pedro. Having Vlastimil taking care sounds good to me.

I am currently without development infrastructure (small village

in the mountains thing). And fixing the SLAB PR in the

first place would be even better.


Best,

Bernard.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] RDMA/siw: Fix the sendmsg byte count in siw_tcp_sendpages
  2025-07-31 20:19     ` Bernard Metzler
@ 2025-08-01  8:12       ` Vlastimil Babka
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Vlastimil Babka @ 2025-08-01  8:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bernard Metzler, Pedro Falcato
  Cc: Jason Gunthorpe, Leon Romanovsky, Jakub Kicinski, David Howells,
	Tom Talpey, linux-rdma, linux-kernel, linux-mm, torvalds, stable,
	kernel test robot

On 7/31/25 22:19, Bernard Metzler wrote:
> On 30.07.2025 11:26, Pedro Falcato wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 08:53:02PM +0200, Bernard Metzler wrote:
>>> On 29.07.2025 14:03, Pedro Falcato wrote:
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Do you want to take the fix through your tree? Otherwise I suspect Vlastimil
>> could simply take it (and possibly resubmit the SLAB PR, which hasn't been
>> merged yet).
>>
> Thanks Pedro. Having Vlastimil taking care sounds good to me.
> 
> I am currently without development infrastructure (small village
> 
> in the mountains thing). And fixing the SLAB PR in the
> 
> first place would be even better.

The SLAB PR was meanwhile merged and Jason said he would take care of
sending a PR with the fix:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250730184724.GC89283@nvidia.com/

> Best,
> 
> Bernard.
> 



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] RDMA/siw: Fix the sendmsg byte count in siw_tcp_sendpages
  2025-07-29 12:03 [PATCH v2] RDMA/siw: Fix the sendmsg byte count in siw_tcp_sendpages Pedro Falcato
  2025-07-29 18:53 ` Bernard Metzler
@ 2025-08-05 14:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2025-08-05 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pedro Falcato
  Cc: Bernard Metzler, Leon Romanovsky, Vlastimil Babka, Jakub Kicinski,
	David Howells, Tom Talpey, linux-rdma, linux-kernel, linux-mm,
	torvalds, stable, kernel test robot

On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 01:03:48PM +0100, Pedro Falcato wrote:
> Ever since commit c2ff29e99a76 ("siw: Inline do_tcp_sendpages()"),
> we have been doing this:
> 
> static int siw_tcp_sendpages(struct socket *s, struct page **page, int offset,
>                              size_t size)
> [...]
>         /* Calculate the number of bytes we need to push, for this page
>          * specifically */
>         size_t bytes = min_t(size_t, PAGE_SIZE - offset, size);
>         /* If we can't splice it, then copy it in, as normal */
>         if (!sendpage_ok(page[i]))
>                 msg.msg_flags &= ~MSG_SPLICE_PAGES;
>         /* Set the bvec pointing to the page, with len $bytes */
>         bvec_set_page(&bvec, page[i], bytes, offset);
>         /* Set the iter to $size, aka the size of the whole sendpages (!!!) */
>         iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, &bvec, 1, size);
> try_page_again:
>         lock_sock(sk);
>         /* Sendmsg with $size size (!!!) */
>         rv = tcp_sendmsg_locked(sk, &msg, size);
> 
> This means we've been sending oversized iov_iters and tcp_sendmsg calls
> for a while. This has a been a benign bug because sendpage_ok() always
> returned true. With the recent slab allocator changes being slowly
> introduced into next (that disallow sendpage on large kmalloc
> allocations), we have recently hit out-of-bounds crashes, due to slight
> differences in iov_iter behavior between the MSG_SPLICE_PAGES and
> "regular" copy paths:
> 
> (MSG_SPLICE_PAGES)
> skb_splice_from_iter
>   iov_iter_extract_pages
>     iov_iter_extract_bvec_pages
>       uses i->nr_segs to correctly stop in its tracks before OoB'ing everywhere
>   skb_splice_from_iter gets a "short" read
> 
> (!MSG_SPLICE_PAGES)
> skb_copy_to_page_nocache copy=iov_iter_count
>  [...]
>    copy_from_iter
>         /* this doesn't help */
>         if (unlikely(iter->count < len))
>                 len = iter->count;
>           iterate_bvec
>             ... and we run off the bvecs
> 
> Fix this by properly setting the iov_iter's byte count, plus sending the
> correct byte count to tcp_sendmsg_locked.
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: c2ff29e99a76 ("siw: Inline do_tcp_sendpages()")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202507220801.50a7210-lkp@intel.com
> Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>

Applied thanks,

Jason


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-08-05 14:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-07-29 12:03 [PATCH v2] RDMA/siw: Fix the sendmsg byte count in siw_tcp_sendpages Pedro Falcato
2025-07-29 18:53 ` Bernard Metzler
2025-07-30  9:26   ` Pedro Falcato
2025-07-31 20:19     ` Bernard Metzler
2025-08-01  8:12       ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-05 14:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).