From: wang lian <lianux.mm@gmail.com>
To: ziy@nvidia.com
Cc: Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
baohua@kernel.org, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
david@redhat.com, dev.jain@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, mhocko@suse.com, npache@redhat.com,
rppt@kernel.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com, shuah@kernel.org,
surenb@google.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
wang lian <lianux.mm@gmail.com>
Subject: RE:[PATCH 3/4] selftests/mm: add check_folio_orders() helper.
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2025 11:00:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250807030000.33303-1-lianux.mm@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250806022045.342824-4-ziy@nvidia.com>
Hi Zi,
Thanks for the patch.
I have a nit suggestion to centralize some of the macro definitions
for better consistency and reusability.
On [Date of patch], Zi Yan wrote:
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c
> ...
> +#define PGMAP_PRESENT (1UL << 63)
> +#define KPF_COMPOUND_HEAD (1UL << 15)
> +#define KPF_COMPOUND_TAIL (1UL << 16)
> +#define KPF_THP (1UL << 22)
> +#define PFN_MASK ((1UL<<55)-1)
Currently, these macros and `PGMAP_PRESENT` are defined locally in
`vm_util.c`. It would be cleaner to move them to the shared header
`vm_util.h`.
This would also allow us to consistently use `PM_PRESENT` (from the
header) instead of the local `PGMAP_PRESENT` duplicate. I noticed the
patch is already moving in this direction, and we can complete this
cleanup.
How about a change like this?
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c
@@ -17,17 +17,6 @@
#define STATUS_FILE_PATH "/proc/self/status"
#define MAX_LINE_LENGTH 500
-#define PGMAP_PRESENT (1UL << 63)
-#define KPF_COMPOUND_HEAD (1UL << 15)
-#define KPF_COMPOUND_TAIL (1UL << 16)
-#define KPF_THP (1UL << 22)
-#define PFN_MASK ((1UL<<55)-1)
-
unsigned int __page_size;
unsigned int __page_shift;
@@ -360,7 +349,7 @@ static int get_page_flags(uint64_t vpn, int pagemap_file, int kpageflags_file,
* Treat non-present page as a page without any flag, so that
* gather_folio_orders() just record the current folio order.
*/
- if (!(pfn & PGMAP_PRESENT)) {
+ if (!(pfn & PM_PRESENT)) {
*flags = 0;
return 0;
}
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.h
@@ -17,6 +17,11 @@
#define PM_FILE BIT_ULL(61)
#define PM_SWAP BIT_ULL(62)
#define PM_PRESENT BIT_ULL(63)
+#define KPF_COMPOUND_HEAD (1UL << 15)
+#define KPF_COMPOUND_TAIL (1UL << 16)
+#define KPF_THP (1UL << 22)
+#define PFN_MASK ((1UL<<55)-1)
extern unsigned int __page_size;
extern unsigned int __page_shift;
Best regards,
wang lian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-07 3:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-06 2:20 [PATCH 0/4] Better split_huge_page_test result check Zi Yan
2025-08-06 2:20 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm/huge_memory: add new_order and offset to split_huge_pages*() pr_debug Zi Yan
2025-08-06 12:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-06 16:51 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-07 6:50 ` Baolin Wang
2025-08-06 2:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm/huge_memory: move to next folio after folio_split() succeeds Zi Yan
2025-08-06 12:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-06 14:29 ` Zi Yan
2025-08-07 8:45 ` Wei Yang
2025-08-07 17:04 ` Zi Yan
2025-08-07 8:55 ` Wei Yang
2025-08-07 17:05 ` Zi Yan
2025-08-08 3:15 ` Wei Yang
2025-08-08 15:24 ` Zi Yan
2025-08-08 15:44 ` Zi Yan
2025-08-06 2:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] selftests/mm: add check_folio_orders() helper Zi Yan
2025-08-07 3:00 ` wang lian [this message]
2025-08-07 17:00 ` Zi Yan
2025-08-07 6:49 ` Baolin Wang
2025-08-07 17:02 ` Zi Yan
2025-08-06 2:20 ` [PATCH 4/4] selftests/mm: check after-split folio orders in split_huge_page_test Zi Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250807030000.33303-1-lianux.mm@gmail.com \
--to=lianux.mm@gmail.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).