From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E5BCCA0EE4 for ; Sat, 16 Aug 2025 05:33:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id BACDA90025D; Sat, 16 Aug 2025 01:33:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id B84CC900256; Sat, 16 Aug 2025 01:33:00 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id AC13A90025D; Sat, 16 Aug 2025 01:33:00 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0015.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.15]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D158900256 for ; Sat, 16 Aug 2025 01:33:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin06.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F3B61A038D for ; Sat, 16 Aug 2025 05:33:00 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 83781501720.06.C3CE8D3 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org (tor.source.kernel.org [172.105.4.254]) by imf30.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 683478000C for ; Sat, 16 Aug 2025 05:32:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf30.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b=jevQ0cpI; spf=pass (imf30.hostedemail.com: domain of akpm@linux-foundation.org designates 172.105.4.254 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=akpm@linux-foundation.org; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1755322378; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=40/Ku1IVsDg5CX4JpZHdSTkz4DhC4ZPnuHd8yIfZR5Y=; b=YOpCrjEDMuYZwMYYELKKmILckB+BSJyGxOXUl1yWBOs2UnihqAyxEhwuiAMUlDJurphL/x HGxl60+ldso3H61uFo/YvOpBdaPBN1EVQWUSTFHrsYnF0c3P/+uj1s1YxYwoAcGNYQLHWz UXWwc2PmSWKEjfqhTzjktxIadBT2p6A= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf30.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b=jevQ0cpI; spf=pass (imf30.hostedemail.com: domain of akpm@linux-foundation.org designates 172.105.4.254 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=akpm@linux-foundation.org; dmarc=none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1755322378; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=wUbcJzqXYmUqACx+BQpwLKaT4HuMGCVeZJdgy3cVvqrhWsr7+css+G9V6RXNbpC6LCQV2u wyD0s6+PMr2DgGQ31rajTUJfJCfyKOCNwwbbo5i2MgH5EI3AuCUnfrXLxLGIQjd9h0e/zT oCKnXEs5GMqxRQ7aMo1P41QFtc4GBYA= Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 668AB6141C; Sat, 16 Aug 2025 05:32:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF153C4CEEF; Sat, 16 Aug 2025 05:32:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1755322377; bh=X7O1jVKovpwhLjSTwmeZcxswY/N3bjAaHeRDsMVRDag=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jevQ0cpIKyiUMzImRBWj1P+2mNroXv7SJjyDPeyGcWpDY0PtiUhOccUUjkw37HCbo 0ZMnLMa4HUaVl0E1dvHSk6Eob7iSkd1+jgHli0wNMVkNK/paSYHC3HX5d5YDF2YvlW 6WyUttO9FK0ihtopVxsp2hq6TqYmtEACRZKSQFtk= Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 22:32:56 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Shakeel Butt Cc: Axel Rasmussen , Yuanchu Xie , Wei Xu , Yu Zhao , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: mark MGLRU as maintained Message-Id: <20250815223256.111f6ce04da3528fdf19ae84@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <22qegz4vktquv22nome6csd4vngvwcaeydoyg3ttqoal5vum27@knjvryszxbdm> References: <20250815215914.3671925-1-axelrasmussen@google.com> <7a46f7jwlwgkbdjvbxjaalrrdamgtxkptmytllhkr2qv4ovbge@nbugfzavwh5w> <22qegz4vktquv22nome6csd4vngvwcaeydoyg3ttqoal5vum27@knjvryszxbdm> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.8.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Stat-Signature: jg8zkwuukkt99p4q3373j98mtdj9zprh X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 683478000C X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-HE-Tag: 1755322378-865553 X-HE-Meta: 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 aJpce2RZ R2cggD13NCxwEZDm3ssGR7LFRsTMkgpE4ILi7TdxM2Dk7bvroLvTA9XEEZ6vJrO3lx9EQN4I/sA8iE48sW1+sOovToBh+AvcSUMUkUTkleQil7GtnwgZzvV7do4QN1ZKFOCtbqdJxNerPKSNDyAvruWn8Wr1SbYfUnvKjg2Q0b6Q7wqT1PfHkBRpamSqXCPR6nSHFCZ/ebgG0XZrnsOjvG6dC5v5f1Adt/2DmXqgg1oUaGIoB3FznbYIrlJI9fZWV/nGglaTY8yPafIKvG6XZUq2mVKg04vYvog8lsbtJHGIMQiNCT5giw4GAqg== X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 17:08:59 -0700 Shakeel Butt wrote: > > > > +MEMORY MANAGEMENT - MGLRU (MULTI-GEN LRU) > > > > > > Why not just add yourselves (and the missing files) to the existing > > > reclaim section? Eventually we want a single reclaim solution, so why > > > not start with single reviewer section? > > > > Sure, I can see the argument for that. > > > > I suppose the case against would be, perhaps the folks already listed > > in the RECLAIM section don't want to additionally get e-mail for the > > extra files listed in this patch? (Perhaps mostly the MGLRU > > documentation, the rest of them aren't necessarily MGLRU specific.) > > > > I don't have a strong preference either way, I think mostly I'd be > > interested to know Andrew's or the other reviewers' preference. Note > > Lorenzo suggested a separate MGLRU section here: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2025/8/14/271 > > > > I would not be too worried about folks getting emails for MGLRU. Anyways > whatever Andrew decides is fine with me. We all like lots of emails, don't we? I don't know, the main thing is to get it in there - we can fine-tune things later if desired.