linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org,aliceryhl@google.com,baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,brauner@kernel.org,david@redhat.com,gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,hughd@google.com,isaacmanjarres@google.com,jack@suse.cz,kernel-team@android.com,linux-mm@kvack.org,lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,lstoakes@gmail.com,luto@kernel.org,mhocko@suse.com,mike.kravetz@oracle.com,muchun.song@linux.dev,osalvador@suse.de,rppt@kernel.org,surenb@google.com,vbabka@suse.cz,viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,willy@infradead.org
Cc: <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "mm: update memfd seal write check to include F_SEAL_WRITE" has been added to the 6.6-stable tree
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 10:26:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025082200-elude-until-b70e@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250730015152.29758-3-isaacmanjarres@google.com>


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    mm: update memfd seal write check to include F_SEAL_WRITE

to the 6.6-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     mm-update-memfd-seal-write-check-to-include-f_seal_write.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.6 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


From stable+bounces-165160-greg=kroah.com@vger.kernel.org Wed Jul 30 03:52:41 2025
From: "Isaac J. Manjarres" <isaacmanjarres@google.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 18:51:46 -0700
Subject: mm: update memfd seal write check to include F_SEAL_WRITE
To: lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,  Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>, Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,  David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,  "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,  Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,  Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: aliceryhl@google.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,  "Isaac J. Manjarres" <isaacmanjarres@google.com>, kernel-team@android.com,  Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,  Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,  Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,  Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <20250730015152.29758-3-isaacmanjarres@google.com>

From: "Isaac J. Manjarres" <isaacmanjarres@google.com>

From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>

[ Upstream commit 28464bbb2ddc199433383994bcb9600c8034afa1 ]

The seal_check_future_write() function is called by shmem_mmap() or
hugetlbfs_file_mmap() to disallow any future writable mappings of an memfd
sealed this way.

The F_SEAL_WRITE flag is not checked here, as that is handled via the
mapping->i_mmap_writable mechanism and so any attempt at a mapping would
fail before this could be run.

However we intend to change this, meaning this check can be performed for
F_SEAL_WRITE mappings also.

The logic here is equally applicable to both flags, so update this
function to accommodate both and rename it accordingly.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/913628168ce6cce77df7d13a63970bae06a526e0.1697116581.git.lstoakes@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Isaac J. Manjarres <isaacmanjarres@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c |    2 +-
 include/linux/mm.h   |   15 ++++++++-------
 mm/shmem.c           |    2 +-
 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ static int hugetlbfs_file_mmap(struct fi
 	vm_flags_set(vma, VM_HUGETLB | VM_DONTEXPAND);
 	vma->vm_ops = &hugetlb_vm_ops;
 
-	ret = seal_check_future_write(info->seals, vma);
+	ret = seal_check_write(info->seals, vma);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -4023,25 +4023,26 @@ static inline void mem_dump_obj(void *ob
 #endif
 
 /**
- * seal_check_future_write - Check for F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE flag and handle it
+ * seal_check_write - Check for F_SEAL_WRITE or F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE flags and
+ *                    handle them.
  * @seals: the seals to check
  * @vma: the vma to operate on
  *
- * Check whether F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE is set; if so, do proper check/handling on
- * the vma flags.  Return 0 if check pass, or <0 for errors.
+ * Check whether F_SEAL_WRITE or F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE are set; if so, do proper
+ * check/handling on the vma flags.  Return 0 if check pass, or <0 for errors.
  */
-static inline int seal_check_future_write(int seals, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+static inline int seal_check_write(int seals, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 {
-	if (seals & F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE) {
+	if (seals & (F_SEAL_WRITE | F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE)) {
 		/*
 		 * New PROT_WRITE and MAP_SHARED mmaps are not allowed when
-		 * "future write" seal active.
+		 * write seals are active.
 		 */
 		if ((vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED) && (vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE))
 			return -EPERM;
 
 		/*
-		 * Since an F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE sealed memfd can be mapped as
+		 * Since an F_SEAL_[FUTURE_]WRITE sealed memfd can be mapped as
 		 * MAP_SHARED and read-only, take care to not allow mprotect to
 		 * revert protections on such mappings. Do this only for shared
 		 * mappings. For private mappings, don't need to mask
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -2396,7 +2396,7 @@ static int shmem_mmap(struct file *file,
 	struct shmem_inode_info *info = SHMEM_I(inode);
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = seal_check_future_write(info->seals, vma);
+	ret = seal_check_write(info->seals, vma);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from isaacmanjarres@google.com are

queue-6.6/mm-update-memfd-seal-write-check-to-include-f_seal_write.patch
queue-6.6/selftests-memfd-add-test-for-mapping-write-sealed-memfd-read-only.patch
queue-6.6/mm-reinstate-ability-to-map-write-sealed-memfd-mappings-read-only.patch
queue-6.6/mm-drop-the-assumption-that-vm_shared-always-implies-writable.patch


  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-22  8:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20250730015152.29758-1-isaacmanjarres@google.com>
2025-07-30  1:51 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 1/4] mm: drop the assumption that VM_SHARED always implies writable Isaac J. Manjarres
2025-08-22  8:25   ` Patch "mm: drop the assumption that VM_SHARED always implies writable" has been added to the 6.6-stable tree gregkh
2025-07-30  1:51 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 2/4] mm: update memfd seal write check to include F_SEAL_WRITE Isaac J. Manjarres
2025-08-22  8:26   ` gregkh [this message]
2025-07-30  1:51 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 3/4] mm: reinstate ability to map write-sealed memfd mappings read-only Isaac J. Manjarres
2025-08-22  8:26   ` Patch "mm: reinstate ability to map write-sealed memfd mappings read-only" has been added to the 6.6-stable tree gregkh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2025082200-elude-until-b70e@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=isaacmanjarres@google.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).