linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	"Andre Almeida" <andrealmeid@igalia.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] powerpc/32: Automatically adapt TASK_SIZE based on constraints
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 13:04:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250822130420.6c6a3fce@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <db7f9b12d731d88ac612a27e2caf4d99d76472d2.1755854833.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>

On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 11:58:05 +0200
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> wrote:

> At the time being, TASK_SIZE can be customized by the user via Kconfig
> but it is not possible to check all constraints in Kconfig. Impossible
> setups are detected at compile time with BUILD_BUG() but that leads
> to build failure when setting crazy values. It is not a problem on its
> own because the user will usually either use the default value or set
> a well thought value. However build robots generate crazy random
> configs that lead to build failures, and build robots see it as a
> regression every time a patch adds such a constraint.
> 
> So instead of failing the build when the custom TASK_SIZE is too
> big, just adjust it to the maximum possible value matching the setup.
> 
> Several architectures already calculate TASK_SIZE based on other
> parameters and options.
> 
> In order to do so, move MODULES_VADDR calculation into task_size_32.h
> and ensure that:
> - On book3s/32, userspace and module area have their own segments (256M)
> - On 8xx, userspace has its own full PGDIR entries (4M)
> 
> Then TASK_SIZE is garantied to be correct so remove related
                    ^ guaranteed

> BUILD_BUG()s.


  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-22 12:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-22  9:57 [PATCH v2 00/10] powerpc: Implement masked user access Christophe Leroy
2025-08-22  9:57 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] iter: Avoid barrier_nospec() in copy_from_user_iter() Christophe Leroy
2025-08-22  9:57 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] uaccess: Add speculation barrier to copy_from_user_iter() Christophe Leroy
2025-08-22 13:46   ` Linus Torvalds
2025-08-22 14:11     ` Giorgi Tchankvetadze
2025-08-22 18:53     ` David Laight
2025-08-22  9:57 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] uaccess: Add masked_user_{read/write}_access_begin Christophe Leroy
2025-08-24 15:08   ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-22  9:58 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] powerpc/uaccess: Move barrier_nospec() out of allow_read_{from/write}_user() Christophe Leroy
2025-08-22  9:58 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] powerpc/uaccess: Remove unused size and from parameters from allow_access_user() Christophe Leroy
2025-08-22  9:58 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] powerpc/uaccess: Remove {allow/prevent}_{read/write/read_write}_{from/to/}_user() Christophe Leroy
2025-08-22  9:58 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] powerpc/uaccess: Refactor user_{read/write/}_access_begin() Christophe Leroy
2025-08-22  9:58 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] powerpc/32s: Fix segments setup when TASK_SIZE is not a multiple of 256M Christophe Leroy
2025-08-22  9:58 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] powerpc/32: Automatically adapt TASK_SIZE based on constraints Christophe Leroy
2025-08-22 12:04   ` David Laight [this message]
2025-08-22  9:58 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] powerpc/uaccess: Implement masked user access Christophe Leroy
2025-08-25  9:04   ` Gabriel Paubert
2025-08-25  9:40     ` Christophe Leroy
2025-08-25 10:18       ` Gabriel Paubert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250822130420.6c6a3fce@pumpkin \
    --to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).