From: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
npache@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com,
baohua@kernel.org, shikemeng@huaweicloud.com, kasong@tencent.com,
nphamcs@gmail.com, bhe@redhat.com, chrisl@kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] huge_mm.h: is_huge_zero_folio(NULL) should return false
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 01:16:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250826231626.218675-1-max.kellermann@ionos.com> (raw)
Calling is_huge_zero_folio(NULL) should not be legal - it makes no
sense, and a different (theoretical) implementation may dereference
the pointer. But currently, lacking any explicit documentation, this
call is legal.
But if somebody really passes NULL, the function should not return
true - this isn't the huge zero folio after all! However, if the
`huge_zero_folio` hasn't been allocated yet, it's NULL, and
is_huge_zero_folio(NULL) just happens to return true, which is a lie.
I believe this is a negligible corner case and I don't want to add any
overhead for this; but in debugging kernels, it may be helpful to add
this check, therefore I put it inside an `#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM`.
This weird side effect prevented me from reproducing a kernel crash
that occurred when the elements of a folio_batch were NULL - since
folios_put_refs() skips huge zero folios, this sometimes causes a
crash, but sometimes does not. For debugging, it is better to reveal
such bugs reliably and not hide them behind random preconditions like
"has the huge zero folio already been created?"
Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>
---
include/linux/huge_mm.h | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
index 7748489fde1b..e4c617c0b445 100644
--- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
@@ -479,7 +479,12 @@ extern unsigned long huge_zero_pfn;
static inline bool is_huge_zero_folio(const struct folio *folio)
{
- return READ_ONCE(huge_zero_folio) == folio;
+ const struct folio *hzf = READ_ONCE(huge_zero_folio);
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
+ if (hzf == NULL)
+ return false;
+#endif
+ return hzf == folio;
}
static inline bool is_huge_zero_pfn(unsigned long pfn)
--
2.47.2
next reply other threads:[~2025-08-26 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-26 23:16 Max Kellermann [this message]
2025-08-26 23:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/swap: add BUG_ON(folio==NULL) to folios_put_refs() Max Kellermann
2025-08-27 1:42 ` Zi Yan
2025-08-27 2:12 ` Chris Li
2025-08-27 9:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-27 1:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] huge_mm.h: is_huge_zero_folio(NULL) should return false Zi Yan
2025-08-27 1:55 ` Andrew Morton
2025-08-27 4:39 ` Max Kellermann
2025-08-27 9:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-27 10:13 ` Max Kellermann
2025-08-27 11:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-27 13:06 ` Max Kellermann
2025-08-27 14:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-27 15:03 ` [PATCH v2] huge_mm.h: disallow is_huge_zero_folio(NULL) Max Kellermann
2025-08-27 15:16 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-27 15:38 ` Max Kellermann
2025-08-27 20:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-27 20:26 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-27 20:44 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-28 8:48 ` [PATCH v3] " Max Kellermann
2025-08-28 9:35 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-29 1:25 ` Zi Yan
2025-08-27 23:53 ` [PATCH v2] " Andrew Morton
2025-08-28 5:17 ` Max Kellermann
2025-08-28 7:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-27 15:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] huge_mm.h: is_huge_zero_folio(NULL) should return false Max Kellermann
2025-08-27 9:35 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250826231626.218675-1-max.kellermann@ionos.com \
--to=max.kellermann@ionos.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).