From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] fscrypt: pass a real sector_t to fscrypt_zeroout_range_inline_crypt
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 13:07:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251107120743.GD30551@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251107035533.GB47797@sol>
On Thu, Nov 06, 2025 at 07:55:33PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 10:34:34AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > While the pblk argument to fscrypt_zeroout_range_inline_crypt is
> > declared as a sector_t it actually is interpreted as a logical block
> > size unit, which is highly unusual. Switch to passing the 512 byte
> > units that sector_t is defined for.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > ---
> > fs/crypto/bio.c | 9 ++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> Looks fine, though of course fscrypt_zeroout_range() itself still takes
> a 'sector_t pblk' argument.
Yes. The argument conventions for fscrypt are a bit odd in general. I
actually cleaned all this up for an earlier version, but decided to keep
it minimal for this version:
https://git.infradead.org/?p=users/hch/misc.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/fscrypt-experiments
I plan to bring the ext4/fscrypt cleanups in that branch back later.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-07 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-31 9:34 move blk-crypto-fallback to sit above the block layer Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31 9:34 ` [PATCH 1/9] mempool: update kerneldoc comments Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-05 14:02 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-05 14:14 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-07 3:26 ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-07 12:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31 9:34 ` [PATCH 2/9] mempool: add error injection support Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-05 14:04 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-07 3:29 ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-07 12:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31 9:34 ` [PATCH 3/9] mempool: add mempool_{alloc,free}_bulk Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-05 15:04 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-06 14:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-06 14:27 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-06 14:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-06 14:57 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-06 15:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-06 15:09 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-07 3:52 ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-07 12:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31 9:34 ` [PATCH 4/9] fscrypt: pass a real sector_t to fscrypt_zeroout_range_inline_crypt Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-07 3:55 ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-07 12:07 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-10-31 9:34 ` [PATCH 5/9] fscrypt: keep multiple bios in flight in fscrypt_zeroout_range_inline_crypt Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-07 4:06 ` Eric Biggers
2025-10-31 9:34 ` [PATCH 6/9] blk-crypto: optimize bio splitting in blk_crypto_fallback_encrypt_bio Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14 0:22 ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-14 5:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31 9:34 ` [PATCH 7/9] blk-crypto: handle the fallback above the block layer Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-07 4:42 ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-07 12:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14 0:37 ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-14 5:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31 9:34 ` [PATCH 8/9] blk-crypto: use on-stack skciphers for fallback en/decryption Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-07 4:18 ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-07 12:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14 0:32 ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-14 5:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31 9:34 ` [PATCH 9/9] blk-crypto: use mempool_alloc_bulk for encrypted bio page allocation Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-05 15:12 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-06 14:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251107120743.GD30551@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).