linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] blk-crypto: use on-stack skciphers for fallback en/decryption
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 13:10:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251107121056.GF30551@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251107041859.GD47797@sol>

On Thu, Nov 06, 2025 at 08:18:59PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 10:34:38AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Allocating a skcipher dynamically can deadlock or cause unexpected
> > I/O failures when called from writeback context.  Sidestep the
> > allocation by using on-stack skciphers, similar to what the non
> > blk-crypto fscrypt already does.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> 
> It might be worth leaving a note in the commit message that this also
> drops the incomplete support for asynchronous algorithms.  ("Incomplete"
> in the sense that they could be used, but only synchronously.)

sure.

> Also note that with asynchronous algorithms no being longer supported,
> the code can actually be simplified further because the
> DECLARE_CRYPTO_WAIT(wait) objects are no longer necessary.  The sequence
> of crypto_sync_skcipher calls that is used should be similar to what
> fscrypt_crypt_data_unit() does.

Ok.



  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-07 12:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-31  9:34 move blk-crypto-fallback to sit above the block layer Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31  9:34 ` [PATCH 1/9] mempool: update kerneldoc comments Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-05 14:02   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-05 14:14     ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-07  3:26   ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-07 12:02     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31  9:34 ` [PATCH 2/9] mempool: add error injection support Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-05 14:04   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-07  3:29   ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-07 12:04     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31  9:34 ` [PATCH 3/9] mempool: add mempool_{alloc,free}_bulk Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-05 15:04   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-06 14:13     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-06 14:27       ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-06 14:48         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-06 14:57           ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-06 15:00             ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-06 15:09               ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-07  3:52   ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-07 12:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31  9:34 ` [PATCH 4/9] fscrypt: pass a real sector_t to fscrypt_zeroout_range_inline_crypt Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-07  3:55   ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-07 12:07     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31  9:34 ` [PATCH 5/9] fscrypt: keep multiple bios in flight in fscrypt_zeroout_range_inline_crypt Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-07  4:06   ` Eric Biggers
2025-10-31  9:34 ` [PATCH 6/9] blk-crypto: optimize bio splitting in blk_crypto_fallback_encrypt_bio Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14  0:22   ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-14  5:56     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31  9:34 ` [PATCH 7/9] blk-crypto: handle the fallback above the block layer Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-07  4:42   ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-07 12:10     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14  0:37   ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-14  5:56     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31  9:34 ` [PATCH 8/9] blk-crypto: use on-stack skciphers for fallback en/decryption Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-07  4:18   ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-07 12:10     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-11-14  0:32   ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-14  5:57     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31  9:34 ` [PATCH 9/9] blk-crypto: use mempool_alloc_bulk for encrypted bio page allocation Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-05 15:12   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-06 14:01     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251107121056.GF30551@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).