linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/cma: Remove CONFIG_CMA_SYSFS option
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 17:09:27 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251114010928.151974-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251113145636.731a24e4@endymion>

On Thu, 13 Nov 2025 14:56:36 +0100 Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> wrote:

> The sysfs interface to CMA has a marginal runtime cost and a small
> footprint, there's no reason not to include it in all kernels where
> the dependencies are satisfied.

Overall change looks good to me.  I have a question below, though.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
> ---
> As discussed with David:
>   https://lkml.org/lkml/2025/8/6/371
> 
>  arch/loongarch/configs/loongson3_defconfig |    1 -
>  arch/s390/configs/debug_defconfig          |    1 -
>  arch/s390/configs/defconfig                |    1 -
>  mm/Kconfig                                 |    7 -------
>  mm/Makefile                                |    4 +++-
>  mm/cma.h                                   |    4 ++--
>  6 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> --- linux-6.17.orig/arch/loongarch/configs/loongson3_defconfig
> +++ linux-6.17/arch/loongarch/configs/loongson3_defconfig
[...]
> --- linux-6.17.orig/mm/cma.h
> +++ linux-6.17/mm/cma.h
> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ struct cma {
>  	char name[CMA_MAX_NAME];
>  	int nranges;
>  	struct cma_memrange ranges[CMA_MAX_RANGES];
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CMA_SYSFS
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
>  	/* the number of CMA page successful allocations */
>  	atomic64_t nr_pages_succeeded;
>  	/* the number of CMA page allocation failures */
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static inline unsigned long cma_bitmap_m
>  	return cmr->count >> cma->order_per_bit;
>  }
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CMA_SYSFS
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
>  void cma_sysfs_account_success_pages(struct cma *cma, unsigned long nr_pages);
>  void cma_sysfs_account_fail_pages(struct cma *cma, unsigned long nr_pages);
>  void cma_sysfs_account_release_pages(struct cma *cma, unsigned long nr_pages);

Why don't you check CONFIG_CMA together?  I think that makes the change more
complete and safe.

I found there is no file that can be compiled without CONFIG_CMA but still
including this header file, so I expect no real issue for now, though.


Thanks,
SJ

[...]


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-14  1:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-13 13:56 [PATCH] mm/cma: Remove CONFIG_CMA_SYSFS option Jean Delvare
2025-11-13 15:35 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-13 16:57   ` Jean Delvare
2025-11-14  1:09 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2025-11-14  8:48   ` Jean Delvare
2025-11-14 15:47     ` SeongJae Park
2025-11-14  8:34 ` Oscar Salvador

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251114010928.151974-1-sj@kernel.org \
    --to=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).