From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/cma: Remove CONFIG_CMA_SYSFS option
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 17:09:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251114010928.151974-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251113145636.731a24e4@endymion>
On Thu, 13 Nov 2025 14:56:36 +0100 Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> wrote:
> The sysfs interface to CMA has a marginal runtime cost and a small
> footprint, there's no reason not to include it in all kernels where
> the dependencies are satisfied.
Overall change looks good to me. I have a question below, though.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
> ---
> As discussed with David:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2025/8/6/371
>
> arch/loongarch/configs/loongson3_defconfig | 1 -
> arch/s390/configs/debug_defconfig | 1 -
> arch/s390/configs/defconfig | 1 -
> mm/Kconfig | 7 -------
> mm/Makefile | 4 +++-
> mm/cma.h | 4 ++--
> 6 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> --- linux-6.17.orig/arch/loongarch/configs/loongson3_defconfig
> +++ linux-6.17/arch/loongarch/configs/loongson3_defconfig
[...]
> --- linux-6.17.orig/mm/cma.h
> +++ linux-6.17/mm/cma.h
> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ struct cma {
> char name[CMA_MAX_NAME];
> int nranges;
> struct cma_memrange ranges[CMA_MAX_RANGES];
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CMA_SYSFS
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
> /* the number of CMA page successful allocations */
> atomic64_t nr_pages_succeeded;
> /* the number of CMA page allocation failures */
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static inline unsigned long cma_bitmap_m
> return cmr->count >> cma->order_per_bit;
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CMA_SYSFS
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
> void cma_sysfs_account_success_pages(struct cma *cma, unsigned long nr_pages);
> void cma_sysfs_account_fail_pages(struct cma *cma, unsigned long nr_pages);
> void cma_sysfs_account_release_pages(struct cma *cma, unsigned long nr_pages);
Why don't you check CONFIG_CMA together? I think that makes the change more
complete and safe.
I found there is no file that can be compiled without CONFIG_CMA but still
including this header file, so I expect no real issue for now, though.
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-14 1:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-13 13:56 [PATCH] mm/cma: Remove CONFIG_CMA_SYSFS option Jean Delvare
2025-11-13 15:35 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-13 16:57 ` Jean Delvare
2025-11-14 1:09 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2025-11-14 8:48 ` Jean Delvare
2025-11-14 15:47 ` SeongJae Park
2025-11-14 8:34 ` Oscar Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251114010928.151974-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).