From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: will@kernel.org, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, npiggin@gmail.com,
peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
hpa@zytor.com, arnd@arndb.de, david@kernel.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
npache@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com,
baohua@kernel.org, ioworker0@gmail.com, shy828301@gmail.com,
riel@surriel.com, jannh@google.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 3/3] mm/khugepaged: skip redundant IPI in collapse_huge_page()
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2025 16:00:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251213080038.10917-4-lance.yang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251213080038.10917-1-lance.yang@linux.dev>
From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Similar to the hugetlb PMD unsharing optimization, skip the second IPI
in collapse_huge_page() when the TLB flush already provides necessary
synchronization.
Before commit a37259732a7d ("x86/mm: Make MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE
unconditional"), bare metal x86 didn't enable MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE.
In that configuration, tlb_remove_table_sync_one() was a NOP. GUP-fast
synchronization relied on IRQ disabling, which blocks TLB flush IPIs.
When Rik made MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE unconditional to support AMD's
INVLPGB, all x86 systems started sending the second IPI. However, on
native x86 this is redundant:
- pmdp_collapse_flush() calls flush_tlb_range(), sending IPIs to all
CPUs to invalidate TLB entries
- GUP-fast runs with IRQs disabled, so when the flush IPI completes,
any concurrent GUP-fast must have finished
- tlb_remove_table_sync_one() provides no additional synchronization
On x86, skip the second IPI when running native (without paravirt) and
without INVLPGB. For paravirt with non-native flush_tlb_multi and for
INVLPGB, conservatively keep both IPIs.
Use tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast(), consistent with the hugetlb
optimization.
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
---
mm/khugepaged.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
index 97d1b2824386..06ea793a8190 100644
--- a/mm/khugepaged.c
+++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
@@ -1178,7 +1178,12 @@ static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
_pmd = pmdp_collapse_flush(vma, address, pmd);
spin_unlock(pmd_ptl);
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
- tlb_remove_table_sync_one();
+ /*
+ * Skip the second IPI if the TLB flush above already synchronized
+ * with concurrent GUP-fast via broadcast IPIs.
+ */
+ if (!tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast())
+ tlb_remove_table_sync_one();
pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, &_pmd, address, &pte_ptl);
if (pte) {
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-13 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-13 8:00 [PATCH RFC 0/3] skip redundant TLB sync IPIs Lance Yang
2025-12-13 8:00 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] mm/tlb: allow architectures to " Lance Yang
2025-12-15 5:48 ` Lance Yang
2025-12-18 13:08 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-13 8:00 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] x86/mm: implement redundant IPI elimination for PMD unsharing Lance Yang
2025-12-18 13:08 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-22 3:19 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] x86/mm: implement redundant IPI elimination for Lance Yang
2025-12-23 9:44 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-23 11:13 ` Lance Yang
2025-12-13 8:00 ` Lance Yang [this message]
2025-12-18 13:13 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] mm/khugepaged: skip redundant IPI in collapse_huge_page() David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-18 14:35 ` Lance Yang
2025-12-19 8:25 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-21 10:43 ` Lance Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251213080038.10917-4-lance.yang@linux.dev \
--to=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).