From: John Groves <John@Groves.net>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: John Groves <John@Groves.net>, John Groves <jgroves@micron.com>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Aravind Ramesh <arramesh@micron.com>,
Ajay Joshi <ajayjoshi@micron.com>, John Groves <john@groves.net>
Subject: [PATCH V2] mm/memremap: fix spurious large folio warning for FS-DAX
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 06:37:17 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251219123717.39330-1-john@groves.net> (raw)
From: John Groves <John@Groves.net>
This patch addresses a warning that I discovered while working on famfs,
which is an fs-dax file system that virtually always does PMD faults
(next famfs patch series coming after the holidays).
However, XFS also does PMD faults in fs-dax mode, and it also triggers
the warning. It takes some effort to get XFS to do a PMD fault, but
instructions to reproduce it are below.
The VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_test_large(folio)) check in
free_zone_device_folio() incorrectly triggers for MEMORY_DEVICE_FS_DAX
when PMD (2MB) mappings are used.
FS-DAX legitimately creates large file-backed folios when handling PMD
faults. This is a core feature of FS-DAX that provides significant
performance benefits by mapping 2MB regions directly to persistent
memory. When these mappings are unmapped, the large folios are freed
through free_zone_device_folio(), which triggers the spurious warning.
The warning was introduced by commit that added support for large zone
device private folios. However, that commit did not account for FS-DAX
file-backed folios, which have always supported large (PMD-sized)
mappings.
The check distinguishes between anonymous folios (which clear
AnonExclusive flags for each sub-page) and file-backed folios. For
file-backed folios, it assumes large folios are unexpected - but this
assumption is incorrect for FS-DAX.
The fix is to exempt MEMORY_DEVICE_FS_DAX from the large folio warning,
allowing FS-DAX to continue using PMD mappings without triggering false
warnings.
Fixes: d245f9b4ab80 ("mm/zone_device: support large zone device private folios")
Signed-off-by: John Groves <john@groves.net>
---
Change since V1: Deleted the warning altogether, rather than exempting
fs-dax.
=== How to reproduce ===
A reproducer is available at:
git clone https://github.com/jagalactic/dax-pmd-test.git
cd xfs-dax-test
make
sudo make test
This will set up XFS on pmem with 2MB stripe alignment and run a test
that triggers the warning.
Alternatively, follow the manual steps below.
Prerequisites:
- Linux kernel with FS-DAX support and CONFIG_DEBUG_VM=y
- A pmem device (real or emulated)
- An fsdax namespace configured via ndctl as /dev/pmem0
Manual steps:
1. Create an fsdax namespace (if not already present):
# ndctl create-namespace -m fsdax -e namespace0.0
2. Create XFS with 2MB stripe alignment:
# mkfs.xfs -f -d su=2m,sw=1 /dev/pmem0
# mount -o dax /dev/pmem0 /mnt/pmem
3. Compile and run the reproducer:
# gcc -Wall -O2 -o dax_pmd_test dax_pmd_test.c
# ./dax_pmd_test /mnt/pmem/testfile
4. Check dmesg for the warning:
WARNING: mm/memremap.c:431 at free_zone_device_folio+0x.../0x...
Note: The 2MB stripe alignment (-d su=2m,sw=1) is critical. XFS normally
allocates blocks at arbitrary offsets, causing PMD faults to fall back
to PTE faults. The stripe alignment forces 2MB-aligned allocations,
allowing PMD faults to succeed and exposing this bug.
mm/memremap.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memremap.c b/mm/memremap.c
index 4c2e0d68eb27..63c6ab4fdf08 100644
--- a/mm/memremap.c
+++ b/mm/memremap.c
@@ -427,8 +427,6 @@ void free_zone_device_folio(struct folio *folio)
if (folio_test_anon(folio)) {
for (i = 0; i < nr; i++)
__ClearPageAnonExclusive(folio_page(folio, i));
- } else {
- VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_test_large(folio));
}
/*
base-commit: 8f0b4cce4481fb22653697cced8d0d04027cb1e8
--
2.49.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-12-19 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-19 12:37 John Groves [this message]
2025-12-19 14:14 ` [PATCH V2] mm/memremap: fix spurious large folio warning for FS-DAX David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-19 20:08 ` dan.j.williams
2025-12-19 20:47 ` Alison Schofield
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251219123717.39330-1-john@groves.net \
--to=john@groves.net \
--cc=ajayjoshi@micron.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=arramesh@micron.com \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=jgroves@micron.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).