linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Groves <John@Groves.net>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: John Groves <John@Groves.net>, John Groves <jgroves@micron.com>,
	"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>,
	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
	Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Aravind Ramesh <arramesh@micron.com>,
	Ajay Joshi <ajayjoshi@micron.com>, John Groves <john@groves.net>
Subject: [PATCH V2] mm/memremap: fix spurious large folio warning for FS-DAX
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 06:37:17 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251219123717.39330-1-john@groves.net> (raw)

From: John Groves <John@Groves.net>

This patch addresses a warning that I discovered while working on famfs,
which is an fs-dax file system that virtually always does PMD faults
(next famfs patch series coming after the holidays).

However, XFS also does PMD faults in fs-dax mode, and it also triggers
the warning. It takes some effort to get XFS to do a PMD fault, but
instructions to reproduce it are below.

The VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_test_large(folio)) check in
free_zone_device_folio() incorrectly triggers for MEMORY_DEVICE_FS_DAX
when PMD (2MB) mappings are used.

FS-DAX legitimately creates large file-backed folios when handling PMD
faults. This is a core feature of FS-DAX that provides significant
performance benefits by mapping 2MB regions directly to persistent
memory. When these mappings are unmapped, the large folios are freed
through free_zone_device_folio(), which triggers the spurious warning.

The warning was introduced by commit that added support for large zone
device private folios. However, that commit did not account for FS-DAX
file-backed folios, which have always supported large (PMD-sized)
mappings.

The check distinguishes between anonymous folios (which clear
AnonExclusive flags for each sub-page) and file-backed folios. For
file-backed folios, it assumes large folios are unexpected - but this
assumption is incorrect for FS-DAX.

The fix is to exempt MEMORY_DEVICE_FS_DAX from the large folio warning,
allowing FS-DAX to continue using PMD mappings without triggering false
warnings.

Fixes: d245f9b4ab80 ("mm/zone_device: support large zone device private folios")
Signed-off-by: John Groves <john@groves.net>
---

Change since V1: Deleted the warning altogether, rather than exempting
fs-dax.

=== How to reproduce ===

A reproducer is available at:

    git clone https://github.com/jagalactic/dax-pmd-test.git
    cd xfs-dax-test
    make
    sudo make test

This will set up XFS on pmem with 2MB stripe alignment and run a test
that triggers the warning.

Alternatively, follow the manual steps below.

Prerequisites:
  - Linux kernel with FS-DAX support and CONFIG_DEBUG_VM=y
  - A pmem device (real or emulated)
  - An fsdax namespace configured via ndctl as /dev/pmem0

Manual steps:

1. Create an fsdax namespace (if not already present):
   # ndctl create-namespace -m fsdax -e namespace0.0

2. Create XFS with 2MB stripe alignment:
   # mkfs.xfs -f -d su=2m,sw=1 /dev/pmem0
   # mount -o dax /dev/pmem0 /mnt/pmem

3. Compile and run the reproducer:
   # gcc -Wall -O2 -o dax_pmd_test dax_pmd_test.c
   # ./dax_pmd_test /mnt/pmem/testfile

4. Check dmesg for the warning:
   WARNING: mm/memremap.c:431 at free_zone_device_folio+0x.../0x...

Note: The 2MB stripe alignment (-d su=2m,sw=1) is critical. XFS normally
allocates blocks at arbitrary offsets, causing PMD faults to fall back
to PTE faults. The stripe alignment forces 2MB-aligned allocations,
allowing PMD faults to succeed and exposing this bug.


 mm/memremap.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memremap.c b/mm/memremap.c
index 4c2e0d68eb27..63c6ab4fdf08 100644
--- a/mm/memremap.c
+++ b/mm/memremap.c
@@ -427,8 +427,6 @@ void free_zone_device_folio(struct folio *folio)
 	if (folio_test_anon(folio)) {
 		for (i = 0; i < nr; i++)
 			__ClearPageAnonExclusive(folio_page(folio, i));
-	} else {
-		VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_test_large(folio));
 	}
 
 	/*

base-commit: 8f0b4cce4481fb22653697cced8d0d04027cb1e8
-- 
2.49.0



             reply	other threads:[~2025-12-19 12:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-19 12:37 John Groves [this message]
2025-12-19 14:14 ` [PATCH V2] mm/memremap: fix spurious large folio warning for FS-DAX David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-19 20:08 ` dan.j.williams
2025-12-19 20:47 ` Alison Schofield

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251219123717.39330-1-john@groves.net \
    --to=john@groves.net \
    --cc=ajayjoshi@micron.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=arramesh@micron.com \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=jgroves@micron.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).