public inbox for linux-mm@kvack.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 01/10] mm/damon/core: introduce damon_ctx->paused
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 08:11:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260320151152.99020-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260319052157.99433-2-sj@kernel.org>

On Wed, 18 Mar 2026 22:21:44 -0700 SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:

> DAMON supports only start and stop of the execution.  When it is
> stopped, its internal data that it self-trained goes away.  It will be
> useful if the execution can be paused and resumed with the previous
> self-trained data.
> 
> Introduce per-context API parameter, 'paused', for the purpose.  The
> parameter can be set and unset while DAMON is running and paused, using
> the online parameters commit helper functions (damon_commit_ctx() and
> damon_call()).  Once 'paused' is set, the kdamond_fn() main loop does
> only limited works with sampling interval sleep during the works.  The
> limited works include the handling of the online parameters update, so
> that users can unset the 'pause' and resume the execution when they
> want.  It also keep checking DAMON stop conditions and handling of it,
> so that DAMON can be stopped while paused if needed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/damon.h | 2 ++
>  mm/damon/core.c       | 9 +++++++++
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/damon.h b/include/linux/damon.h
> index 3a441fbca170d..421e51eff3bd2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/damon.h
> +++ b/include/linux/damon.h
> @@ -811,6 +811,8 @@ struct damon_ctx {
>  	 * intervals tuning
>  	 */
>  	unsigned long next_intervals_tune_sis;
> +	/* pause kdamond main loop */
> +	bool pause;
>  	/* for waiting until the execution of the kdamond_fn is started */
>  	struct completion kdamond_started;
>  	/* for scheme quotas prioritization */
> diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> index 339325e1096bc..0b6cb63d64d0e 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
> @@ -1331,6 +1331,7 @@ int damon_commit_ctx(struct damon_ctx *dst, struct damon_ctx *src)
>  		if (err)
>  			return err;
>  	}
> +	dst->pause = src->pause;
>  	dst->ops = src->ops;
>  	dst->addr_unit = src->addr_unit;
>  	dst->min_region_sz = src->min_region_sz;
> @@ -2978,6 +2979,14 @@ static int kdamond_fn(void *data)
>  		 * kdamond_merge_regions() if possible, to reduce overhead
>  		 */
>  		kdamond_call(ctx, false);
> +		while (ctx->pause) {
> +			if (kdamond_need_stop(ctx))
> +				goto done;
> +			kdamond_usleep(ctx->attrs.sample_interval);
> +			/* allow caller unset pause via damon_call() */
> +			kdamond_call(ctx, false);
> +			damos_walk_cancel(ctx);

Sashiko comment
(https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260319052157.99433-2-sj@kernel.org) and my
reply below.

: Can this cause spurious cancellations of DAMOS walk requests if the context
: is unpaused?
: 
: If kdamond_call() processes a commit that sets ctx->pause = false, and a new
: walk request is queued concurrently or immediately after, this unconditional
: call to damos_walk_cancel() will cancel the newly submitted request before
: the loop condition is evaluated again to exit the loop.
: 
: Would it be safer to verify if the context is still paused before cancelling,
: perhaps by checking if (ctx->pause) before calling damos_walk_cancel()?

Yes, it can cause unnecessary cancel of damos_walk() request.  But cancelling a
few more damos_walk() request is no big deal.  The caller and user can show it
is cancelled, and just ask it again.

So, not a problem.


Thanks,
SJ

[...]


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-20 15:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-19  5:21 [RFC PATCH v2 00/10] mm/damon: let DAMON be paused and resumed SeongJae Park
2026-03-19  5:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/10] mm/damon/core: introduce damon_ctx->paused SeongJae Park
2026-03-19  6:29   ` SeongJae Park
2026-03-20 15:11   ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2026-03-19  5:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/10] mm/damon/sysfs: add pause file under context dir SeongJae Park
2026-03-19  5:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/10] Docs/mm/damon/design: update for context pause/resume feature SeongJae Park
2026-03-20 15:17   ` SeongJae Park
2026-03-19  5:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/10] Docs/admin-guide/mm/damon/usage: update for pause file SeongJae Park
2026-03-19  5:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/10] Docs/ABI/damon: update for pause sysfs file SeongJae Park
2026-03-19  5:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/10] mm/damon/tests/core-kunit: test pause commitment SeongJae Park
2026-03-19  5:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/10] selftests/damon/_damon_sysfs: support pause file staging SeongJae Park
2026-03-20 15:22   ` SeongJae Park
2026-03-19  5:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/10] selftests/damon/drgn_dump_damon_status: dump pause SeongJae Park
2026-03-19  5:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/10] selftests/damon/sysfs.py: check pause on assert_ctx_committed() SeongJae Park
2026-03-19  5:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/10] selftets/damon/sysfs.py: pause DAMON before dumping status SeongJae Park
2026-03-20 15:29   ` SeongJae Park
2026-03-20 15:41     ` SeongJae Park
2026-03-21  1:02       ` SeongJae Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260320151152.99020-1-sj@kernel.org \
    --to=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox