From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>, Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm: Change gfp_t to unsigned long
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2026 14:25:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202603221419.9kAfrwc5-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260319-gfp64-v1-5-2c73b8d42b7f@google.com>
Hi Brendan,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on 8a30aeb0d1b4e4aaf7f7bae72f20f2ae75385ccb]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Brendan-Jackman/drm-managed-Use-special-gfp_t-format-specifier/20260322-145930
base: 8a30aeb0d1b4e4aaf7f7bae72f20f2ae75385ccb
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260319-gfp64-v1-5-2c73b8d42b7f%40google.com
patch subject: [PATCH 5/5] mm: Change gfp_t to unsigned long
config: x86_64-rhel-9.4-kunit (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260322/202603221419.9kAfrwc5-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260322/202603221419.9kAfrwc5-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202603221419.9kAfrwc5-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from include/linux/module.h:23,
from lib/test_lockup.c:8:
>> lib/test_lockup.c:133:47: error: expected ';' before 'long'
133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400);
| ^~~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:175:23: note: in definition of macro 'module_param_named_unsafe'
175 | param_check_##type(name, &(value)); \
| ^~~~
lib/test_lockup.c:133:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_unsafe'
133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/moduleparam.h:175:32: error: expected ')' before ',' token
175 | param_check_##type(name, &(value)); \
| ^
include/linux/moduleparam.h:149:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_named_unsafe'
149 | module_param_named_unsafe(name, name, type, perm)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lib/test_lockup.c:133:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_unsafe'
133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/moduleparam.h:176:39: error: 'param_ops_unsigned' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'param_ops_uint'?
176 | module_param_cb_unsafe(name, ¶m_ops_##type, &value, perm); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:305:46: note: in definition of macro '__module_param_call'
305 | = { __param_str_##name, THIS_MODULE, ops, \
| ^~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:176:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_cb_unsafe'
176 | module_param_cb_unsafe(name, ¶m_ops_##type, &value, perm); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:149:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_named_unsafe'
149 | module_param_named_unsafe(name, name, type, perm)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lib/test_lockup.c:133:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_unsafe'
133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lib/test_lockup.c:133:47: error: expected '}' before 'long'
133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400);
| ^~~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:305:46: note: in definition of macro '__module_param_call'
305 | = { __param_str_##name, THIS_MODULE, ops, \
| ^~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:176:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_cb_unsafe'
176 | module_param_cb_unsafe(name, ¶m_ops_##type, &value, perm); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:149:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_named_unsafe'
149 | module_param_named_unsafe(name, name, type, perm)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lib/test_lockup.c:133:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_unsafe'
133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:305:11: note: to match this '{'
305 | = { __param_str_##name, THIS_MODULE, ops, \
| ^
include/linux/moduleparam.h:192:9: note: in expansion of macro '__module_param_call'
192 | __module_param_call(MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX, name, ops, arg, perm, -1, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:176:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_cb_unsafe'
176 | module_param_cb_unsafe(name, ¶m_ops_##type, &value, perm); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:149:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_named_unsafe'
149 | module_param_named_unsafe(name, name, type, perm)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lib/test_lockup.c:133:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_unsafe'
133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
In file included from include/linux/module.h:23,
from test_lockup.c:8:
test_lockup.c:133:47: error: expected ';' before 'long'
133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400);
| ^~~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:175:23: note: in definition of macro 'module_param_named_unsafe'
175 | param_check_##type(name, &(value)); \
| ^~~~
test_lockup.c:133:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_unsafe'
133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/moduleparam.h:175:32: error: expected ')' before ',' token
175 | param_check_##type(name, &(value)); \
| ^
include/linux/moduleparam.h:149:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_named_unsafe'
149 | module_param_named_unsafe(name, name, type, perm)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
test_lockup.c:133:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_unsafe'
133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/moduleparam.h:176:39: error: 'param_ops_unsigned' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'param_ops_uint'?
176 | module_param_cb_unsafe(name, ¶m_ops_##type, &value, perm); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:305:46: note: in definition of macro '__module_param_call'
305 | = { __param_str_##name, THIS_MODULE, ops, \
| ^~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:176:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_cb_unsafe'
176 | module_param_cb_unsafe(name, ¶m_ops_##type, &value, perm); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:149:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_named_unsafe'
149 | module_param_named_unsafe(name, name, type, perm)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
test_lockup.c:133:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_unsafe'
133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
test_lockup.c:133:47: error: expected '}' before 'long'
133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400);
| ^~~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:305:46: note: in definition of macro '__module_param_call'
305 | = { __param_str_##name, THIS_MODULE, ops, \
| ^~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:176:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_cb_unsafe'
176 | module_param_cb_unsafe(name, ¶m_ops_##type, &value, perm); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:149:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_named_unsafe'
149 | module_param_named_unsafe(name, name, type, perm)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
test_lockup.c:133:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_unsafe'
133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:305:11: note: to match this '{'
305 | = { __param_str_##name, THIS_MODULE, ops, \
| ^
include/linux/moduleparam.h:192:9: note: in expansion of macro '__module_param_call'
192 | __module_param_call(MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX, name, ops, arg, perm, -1, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:176:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_cb_unsafe'
176 | module_param_cb_unsafe(name, ¶m_ops_##type, &value, perm); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:149:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_named_unsafe'
149 | module_param_named_unsafe(name, name, type, perm)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
test_lockup.c:133:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_unsafe'
133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +133 lib/test_lockup.c
131
132 static gfp_t alloc_pages_gfp = GFP_KERNEL;
> 133 module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400);
134 MODULE_PARM_DESC(alloc_pages_gfp, "allocate pages with this gfp_mask, default GFP_KERNEL");
135
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-22 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-19 16:03 [PATCH 0/5] mm: Switch gfp_t to unsigned long Brendan Jackman
2026-03-19 16:03 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/managed: Use special gfp_t format specifier Brendan Jackman
2026-03-19 16:03 ` [PATCH 2/5] iwlegacy: 3945-mac: " Brendan Jackman
2026-03-19 16:03 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm/kfence: " Brendan Jackman
2026-03-19 16:03 ` [PATCH 4/5] net/rds: " Brendan Jackman
2026-03-19 16:03 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm: Change gfp_t to unsigned long Brendan Jackman
2026-03-22 13:25 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2026-03-22 15:39 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-22 18:47 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-19 16:56 ` [PATCH 0/5] mm: Switch " Matthew Wilcox
2026-03-19 18:40 ` Brendan Jackman
2026-03-19 21:39 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-03-20 9:48 ` Brendan Jackman
2026-03-20 10:02 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-03-20 13:22 ` Brendan Jackman
2026-03-19 17:03 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-03-19 17:38 ` Brendan Jackman
2026-03-19 19:58 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-03-20 9:56 ` Brendan Jackman
2026-03-19 18:30 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-20 9:37 ` Brendan Jackman
2026-03-20 16:26 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202603221419.9kAfrwc5-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox