From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@gmail.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>, damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v4] mm/damon: add synchronous commit for commit_inputs
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 08:16:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260323151611.81358-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260323141955.20535-1-aethernet65535@gmail.com>
On Mon, 23 Mar 2026 22:19:55 +0800 Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi SeongJae,
>
> Follow-up on my previous email regarding the locking concerns.
>
> > I admit I don't have an elegant solution yet. Here are my current
> > thought:
> >
> > Add a timeout to wait_for_completion() (e.g.,
> > wait_for_completion_timeout()), using 'damos_watermarks.interval' as the
> > upper bound. This prevents indefinite blocking of 'param_lock', though
> > it still holds the global lock for up to several seconds.
>
> After further analysis, I realized that since both 'commit_inputs' and
> 'enabled' module parameters are protected by the global 'param_lock',
> stopping kdamond gracefully (via enabled=N) is serialized with
> 'commit_inputs' writes. Therefore, a classic deadlock scenario should
> not occur in normal operation.
>
> However, I'm considering edge cases where kdamond might terminate
> unexpectedly. In such cases, commit_inputs_store() could hold
> 'param_lock' indefinitely, blocking other module parameter updates
> system-wide.
>
> To mitigate this risk defensively, would you accept adding a timeout to
> wait_for_completion()? This ensures 'param_lock' is eventually released
> even if kdamond fails unexpectedly.
>
> Please let me know your preference. :>
As I mentioned on the reply to the original mail of this mail, I think such
infinite wait will not happen because damon_call() is aware of the kdamond
stop, and therefore the timeout is not needed. Please double check and let me
know if I'm missing something, though, as a reply to my reply.
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-23 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-23 2:16 [RFC v4] mm/damon: add synchronous commit for commit_inputs Liew Rui Yan
2026-03-23 7:27 ` Liew Rui Yan
2026-03-23 14:19 ` Liew Rui Yan
2026-03-23 15:16 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2026-03-23 18:38 ` Liew Rui Yan
2026-03-23 15:12 ` SeongJae Park
2026-03-23 18:37 ` Liew Rui Yan
2026-03-23 15:05 ` SeongJae Park
2026-03-23 18:37 ` Liew Rui Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260323151611.81358-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=aethernet65535@gmail.com \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox