public inbox for linux-mm@kvack.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@gmail.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>, damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v4] mm/damon: add synchronous commit for commit_inputs
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 08:16:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260323151611.81358-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260323141955.20535-1-aethernet65535@gmail.com>

On Mon, 23 Mar 2026 22:19:55 +0800 Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi SeongJae,
> 
> Follow-up on my previous email regarding the locking concerns.
> 
> > I admit I don't have an elegant solution yet. Here are my current
> > thought:
> > 
> > Add a timeout to wait_for_completion() (e.g.,
> > wait_for_completion_timeout()), using 'damos_watermarks.interval' as the
> > upper bound. This prevents indefinite blocking of 'param_lock', though
> > it still holds the global lock for up to several seconds.
> 
> After further analysis, I realized that since both 'commit_inputs' and
> 'enabled' module parameters are protected by the global 'param_lock',
> stopping kdamond gracefully (via enabled=N) is serialized with
> 'commit_inputs' writes. Therefore, a classic deadlock scenario should
> not occur in normal operation.
> 
> However, I'm considering edge cases where kdamond might terminate
> unexpectedly. In such cases, commit_inputs_store() could hold
> 'param_lock' indefinitely, blocking other module parameter updates
> system-wide.
> 
> To mitigate this risk defensively, would you accept adding a timeout to
> wait_for_completion()? This ensures 'param_lock' is eventually released
> even if kdamond fails unexpectedly.
> 
> Please let me know your preference. :>

As I mentioned on the reply to the original mail of this mail, I think such
infinite wait will not happen because damon_call() is aware of the kdamond
stop, and therefore the timeout is not needed.  Please double check and let me
know if I'm missing something, though, as a reply to my reply.


Thanks,
SJ

[...]


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-23 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-23  2:16 [RFC v4] mm/damon: add synchronous commit for commit_inputs Liew Rui Yan
2026-03-23  7:27 ` Liew Rui Yan
2026-03-23 14:19   ` Liew Rui Yan
2026-03-23 15:16     ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2026-03-23 18:38       ` Liew Rui Yan
2026-03-23 15:12   ` SeongJae Park
2026-03-23 18:37     ` Liew Rui Yan
2026-03-23 15:05 ` SeongJae Park
2026-03-23 18:37   ` Liew Rui Yan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260323151611.81358-1-sj@kernel.org \
    --to=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=aethernet65535@gmail.com \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox