From: Chenghao Duan <duanchenghao@kylinos.cn>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, rppt@kernel.org, pratyush@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
jianghaoran@kylinos.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Modify memfd_luo code
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 09:54:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260324015420.GA33036@chenghao-pc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260323140938.ba8943a5247c14b17bc70142@linux-foundation.org>
On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 02:09:38PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Mar 2026 19:07:43 +0800 Chenghao Duan <duanchenghao@kylinos.cn> wrote:
>
> > I found several modifiable points while reading the code. Please review.
>
> Thanks, I've updated mm.git to this version,
>
> AI review has raised a few potential issues. Perhaps they were present
> in its review of the v1 patchset.
>
> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260323110747.193569-1-duanchenghao@kylinos.cn
Sure. My apologies for only addressing Pratyush Yadav's comments in my
reply to the v1 patchset, while overlooking the AI review link mentioned
in the email.
I have realized that the AI raised structural potential issues in the
overall code, not problems specific to the patch itself. I will analyze
the findings from the AI review and attempt to resolve these potential
issues.
If anyone has better solutions or code for the potential issues raised
in the AI review, please feel free to contribute.
BRs
Chenghao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-24 1:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-23 11:07 [PATCH v2 0/4] Modify memfd_luo code Chenghao Duan
2026-03-23 11:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm/memfd: use folio_nr_pages() for shmem inode accounting Chenghao Duan
2026-03-23 11:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mm/memfd_luo: optimize shmem_recalc_inode calls in retrieve path Chenghao Duan
2026-03-23 11:07 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mm/memfd_luo: remove unnecessary memset in zero-size memfd path Chenghao Duan
2026-03-23 11:07 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mm/memfd_luo: use i_size_write() to set inode size during retrieve Chenghao Duan
2026-03-23 21:09 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Modify memfd_luo code Andrew Morton
2026-03-24 1:54 ` Chenghao Duan [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-03-23 11:07 Chenghao Duan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260324015420.GA33036@chenghao-pc \
--to=duanchenghao@kylinos.cn \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jianghaoran@kylinos.cn \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox