public inbox for linux-mm@kvack.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
	Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	Han Shen <shenhan@google.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
	Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
	Tomas Glozar <tglozar@redhat.com>,
	Yair Podemsky <ypodemsk@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>, Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.com>,
	Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v8 01/10] objtool: Make validate_call() recognize indirect calls to pv_ops[]
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 10:47:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260324094801.3092968-2-vschneid@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260324094801.3092968-1-vschneid@redhat.com>

call_dest_name() does not get passed the file pointer of validate_call(),
which means its invocation of insn_reloc() will always return NULL. Make it
take a file pointer.

While at it, make sure call_dest_name() uses arch_dest_reloc_offset(),
otherwise it gets the pv_ops[] offset wrong.

Fabricating an intentional warning shows the change; previously:

  vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __flush_tlb_all_noinstr+0x4: call to {dynamic}() leaves .noinstr.text section

now:

  vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __flush_tlb_all_noinstr+0x4: call to pv_ops[1]() leaves .noinstr.text section

Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
---
 tools/objtool/check.c | 14 ++++++++------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/objtool/check.c b/tools/objtool/check.c
index 3fd98c5b6e1a8..7c82934247484 100644
--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
@@ -3388,7 +3388,7 @@ static inline bool func_uaccess_safe(struct symbol *func)
 	return false;
 }
 
-static inline const char *call_dest_name(struct instruction *insn)
+static inline const char *call_dest_name(struct objtool_file *file, struct instruction *insn)
 {
 	static char pvname[19];
 	struct reloc *reloc;
@@ -3397,9 +3397,9 @@ static inline const char *call_dest_name(struct instruction *insn)
 	if (insn_call_dest(insn))
 		return insn_call_dest(insn)->name;
 
-	reloc = insn_reloc(NULL, insn);
+	reloc = insn_reloc(file, insn);
 	if (reloc && !strcmp(reloc->sym->name, "pv_ops")) {
-		idx = (reloc_addend(reloc) / sizeof(void *));
+		idx = arch_insn_adjusted_addend(insn, reloc) / sizeof(void *);
 		snprintf(pvname, sizeof(pvname), "pv_ops[%d]", idx);
 		return pvname;
 	}
@@ -3478,17 +3478,19 @@ static int validate_call(struct objtool_file *file,
 {
 	if (state->noinstr && state->instr <= 0 &&
 	    !noinstr_call_dest(file, insn, insn_call_dest(insn))) {
-		WARN_INSN(insn, "call to %s() leaves .noinstr.text section", call_dest_name(insn));
+		WARN_INSN(insn, "call to %s() leaves .noinstr.text section", call_dest_name(file, insn));
 		return 1;
 	}
 
 	if (state->uaccess && !func_uaccess_safe(insn_call_dest(insn))) {
-		WARN_INSN(insn, "call to %s() with UACCESS enabled", call_dest_name(insn));
+		WARN_INSN(insn, "call to %s() with UACCESS enabled",
+			  call_dest_name(file, insn));
 		return 1;
 	}
 
 	if (state->df) {
-		WARN_INSN(insn, "call to %s() with DF set", call_dest_name(insn));
+		WARN_INSN(insn, "call to %s() with DF set",
+			  call_dest_name(file, insn));
 		return 1;
 	}
 
-- 
2.52.0



  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-24  9:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-24  9:47 [RFC PATCH v8 00/10] context_tracking,x86: Defer some IPIs until a user->kernel transition Valentin Schneider
2026-03-24  9:47 ` Valentin Schneider [this message]
2026-03-24  9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v8 02/10] objtool: Flesh out warning related to pv_ops[] calls Valentin Schneider
2026-03-24  9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v8 03/10] objtool: Always pass a section to validate_unwind_hints() Valentin Schneider
2026-03-24  9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v8 04/10] x86/retpoline: Make warn_thunk_thunk .noinstr Valentin Schneider
2026-03-24  9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v8 05/10] sched/isolation: Mark housekeeping_overridden key as __ro_after_init Valentin Schneider
2026-03-24 15:17   ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-03-24 19:46     ` Valentin Schneider
2026-03-24  9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v8 06/10] objtool: Add .entry.text validation for static branches Valentin Schneider
2026-03-24  9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v8 07/10] x86/jump_label: Add ASM support for static_branch_likely() Valentin Schneider
2026-03-24  9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v8 08/10] x86/mm/pti: Introduce a kernel/user CR3 software signal Valentin Schneider
2026-03-24  9:48 ` [RFC PATCH v8 09/10] context_tracking,x86: Defer kernel text patching IPIs when tracking CR3 switches Valentin Schneider
2026-03-24  9:48 ` [RFC PATCH v8 10/10] x86/mm, mm/vmalloc: Defer kernel TLB flush " Valentin Schneider
2026-03-24 15:01 ` [syzbot ci] Re: context_tracking,x86: Defer some IPIs until a user->kernel transition syzbot ci

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260324094801.3092968-2-vschneid@redhat.com \
    --to=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dwagner@suse.de \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
    --cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ptesarik@suse.com \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    --cc=shenhan@google.com \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglozar@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=williams@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=ypodemsk@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox