public inbox for linux-mm@kvack.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: Josh Law <objecting@objecting.org>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, damon@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (sashiko review) [PATCH] mm/damon/core: eliminate hot-path integer division in damon_max_nr_accesses()
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 18:16:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260325011653.85502-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260324154005.83651-1-objecting@objecting.org>

Forwarding Sashiko review for doing discussions via mails.

# review url: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260324154005.83651-1-objecting@objecting.org
# start of sashiko.dev inline review
commit ff5e227a18cd69435749b0aae0dc2c762c4f0a47
Author: Josh Law <objecting@objecting.org>

mm/damon/core: eliminate hot-path integer division in damon_max_nr_accesses()
    
Hardware integer division is slow. The function damon_max_nr_accesses(),
which is called very frequently, performs an integer division.
However, the struct damon_attrs already caches this exact ratio in the
internal field aggr_samples. We can eliminate the hardware division in
the hot path by simply returning aggr_samples.

> diff --git a/include/linux/damon.h b/include/linux/damon.h
> index d9a3babbafc1..04c8a052fcfb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/damon.h
> +++ b/include/linux/damon.h
> @@ -978,8 +978,7 @@ static inline bool damon_target_has_pid(const struct damon_ctx *ctx)
>  static inline unsigned int damon_max_nr_accesses(const struct damon_attrs *attrs)
>  {
>  	/* {aggr,sample}_interval are unsigned long, hence could overflow */
> -	return min(attrs->aggr_interval / attrs->sample_interval,
> -			(unsigned long)UINT_MAX);
> +	return min_t(unsigned long, attrs->aggr_samples, UINT_MAX);
>  }

If an administrator dynamically updates aggr_interval via sysfs and commits
the inputs, will attrs->aggr_samples be correctly recalculated?

If aggr_samples becomes stale, kdamond_fn() will compute the real aggregation
loop count and allow r->nr_accesses to increment up to the new bounds (for
example, 80 loops). Meanwhile, damon_max_nr_accesses() will return the
stale aggr_samples cache (for example, 20).

When evaluating schemes, damon_hot_score() normalizes r->nr_accesses against
this stale maximum, producing a freq_subscore that severely exceeds
DAMON_MAX_SUBSCORE. This causes the calculated hotness to exceed
DAMOS_MAX_SCORE.

For DAMOS_PAGEOUT actions used by damon_reclaim, damon_cold_score() returns
DAMOS_MAX_SCORE - hotness, yielding a highly negative score.

Could this negative score cause an out-of-bounds write on the
kernel heap when used as an array index?

mm/damon/core.c:damos_walk() {
    ...
    c->regions_score_histogram[score] += damon_sz_region(r);
    ...
}

> diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> index db6c67e52d2b..afb058f7da5c 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
> @@ -587,6 +587,7 @@ struct damon_ctx *damon_new_ctx(void)
>  	ctx->attrs.sample_interval = 5 * 1000;
>  	ctx->attrs.aggr_interval = 100 * 1000;
>  	ctx->attrs.ops_update_interval = 60 * 1000 * 1000;
> +	ctx->attrs.aggr_samples = 20;

Since this value is cached here, but not updated when intervals change, does
it remain permanently stale during dynamic updates?


# end of sashiko.dev inline review
# review url: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260324154005.83651-1-objecting@objecting.org
#
# hkml [1] generated a draft of this mail.  It can be regenerated
# using below command:
#
#     hkml patch sashiko_dev --for_forwarding \
#             20260324154005.83651-1-objecting@objecting.org
#
# [1] https://github.com/sjp38/hackermail

Sent using hkml (https://github.com/sjp38/hackermail)


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-25  1:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-24 15:40 [PATCH] mm/damon/core: eliminate hot-path integer division in damon_max_nr_accesses() Josh Law
2026-03-25  1:16 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2026-03-25  7:36   ` (sashiko review) " Josh Law
2026-03-25 14:43     ` SeongJae Park
2026-03-25 14:57   ` SeongJae Park
2026-03-25 14:54 ` SeongJae Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260325011653.85502-1-sj@kernel.org \
    --to=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=objecting@objecting.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox