From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: Josh Law <objecting@objecting.org>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, damon@lists.linux.dev,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (sashiko review) [PATCH] mm/damon/core: eliminate hot-path integer division in damon_max_nr_accesses()
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 18:16:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260325011653.85502-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260324154005.83651-1-objecting@objecting.org>
Forwarding Sashiko review for doing discussions via mails.
# review url: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260324154005.83651-1-objecting@objecting.org
# start of sashiko.dev inline review
commit ff5e227a18cd69435749b0aae0dc2c762c4f0a47
Author: Josh Law <objecting@objecting.org>
mm/damon/core: eliminate hot-path integer division in damon_max_nr_accesses()
Hardware integer division is slow. The function damon_max_nr_accesses(),
which is called very frequently, performs an integer division.
However, the struct damon_attrs already caches this exact ratio in the
internal field aggr_samples. We can eliminate the hardware division in
the hot path by simply returning aggr_samples.
> diff --git a/include/linux/damon.h b/include/linux/damon.h
> index d9a3babbafc1..04c8a052fcfb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/damon.h
> +++ b/include/linux/damon.h
> @@ -978,8 +978,7 @@ static inline bool damon_target_has_pid(const struct damon_ctx *ctx)
> static inline unsigned int damon_max_nr_accesses(const struct damon_attrs *attrs)
> {
> /* {aggr,sample}_interval are unsigned long, hence could overflow */
> - return min(attrs->aggr_interval / attrs->sample_interval,
> - (unsigned long)UINT_MAX);
> + return min_t(unsigned long, attrs->aggr_samples, UINT_MAX);
> }
If an administrator dynamically updates aggr_interval via sysfs and commits
the inputs, will attrs->aggr_samples be correctly recalculated?
If aggr_samples becomes stale, kdamond_fn() will compute the real aggregation
loop count and allow r->nr_accesses to increment up to the new bounds (for
example, 80 loops). Meanwhile, damon_max_nr_accesses() will return the
stale aggr_samples cache (for example, 20).
When evaluating schemes, damon_hot_score() normalizes r->nr_accesses against
this stale maximum, producing a freq_subscore that severely exceeds
DAMON_MAX_SUBSCORE. This causes the calculated hotness to exceed
DAMOS_MAX_SCORE.
For DAMOS_PAGEOUT actions used by damon_reclaim, damon_cold_score() returns
DAMOS_MAX_SCORE - hotness, yielding a highly negative score.
Could this negative score cause an out-of-bounds write on the
kernel heap when used as an array index?
mm/damon/core.c:damos_walk() {
...
c->regions_score_histogram[score] += damon_sz_region(r);
...
}
> diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> index db6c67e52d2b..afb058f7da5c 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
> @@ -587,6 +587,7 @@ struct damon_ctx *damon_new_ctx(void)
> ctx->attrs.sample_interval = 5 * 1000;
> ctx->attrs.aggr_interval = 100 * 1000;
> ctx->attrs.ops_update_interval = 60 * 1000 * 1000;
> + ctx->attrs.aggr_samples = 20;
Since this value is cached here, but not updated when intervals change, does
it remain permanently stale during dynamic updates?
# end of sashiko.dev inline review
# review url: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260324154005.83651-1-objecting@objecting.org
#
# hkml [1] generated a draft of this mail. It can be regenerated
# using below command:
#
# hkml patch sashiko_dev --for_forwarding \
# 20260324154005.83651-1-objecting@objecting.org
#
# [1] https://github.com/sjp38/hackermail
Sent using hkml (https://github.com/sjp38/hackermail)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-25 1:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-24 15:40 [PATCH] mm/damon/core: eliminate hot-path integer division in damon_max_nr_accesses() Josh Law
2026-03-25 1:16 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2026-03-25 7:36 ` (sashiko review) " Josh Law
2026-03-25 14:43 ` SeongJae Park
2026-03-25 14:57 ` SeongJae Park
2026-03-25 14:54 ` SeongJae Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260325011653.85502-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=objecting@objecting.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox