From: Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@gmail.com>
To: sj@kernel.org
Cc: aethernet65535@gmail.com, damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: (sashiko review) [RFC v5] mm/damon: add synchronous commit for commit_inputs
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 15:17:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260325071709.9699-1-aethernet65535@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260325025317.86571-1-sj@kernel.org>
Hi SeongJae,
> Forwarding Sashiko review for doing discussions via mails.
>
> # review url: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260325013939.18167-1-aethernet65535@gmail.com
> # start of sashiko.dev inline review
> commit 60ccea4154b0c58741fae2323454a5a9496b67fa
> Author: Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@gmail.com>
>
> mm/damon: add synchronous commit for commit_inputs
>
> Writing invalid parameters to sysfs followed by commit_inputs=Y previously
> failed silently. This patch uses damon_call() to synchronously commit
> parameters in the kdamond thread's safe context, returning validation errors
> immediately to userspace.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260318153731.97470-1-aethernet65535@gmail.com
>
> > diff --git a/mm/damon/lru_sort.c b/mm/damon/lru_sort.c
> > index 554559d72976..a2410f648b51 100644
> > --- a/mm/damon/lru_sort.c
> > +++ b/mm/damon/lru_sort.c
Thank you for forwarding the review from Sashiko.dev!
> > +static int damon_lru_sort_commit_inputs_store(const char *val,
> > + const struct kernel_param *kp)
> > +{
> > + bool commit_inputs_request;
> > int err;
> > + struct damon_call_control control = {
> > + .fn = damon_lru_sort_commit_inputs_fn,
> > + .data = ctx,
> > + .repeat = false,
> > + };
> >
> > - if (!commit_inputs)
> > + err = kstrtobool(val, &commit_inputs_request);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > +
> > + if (!commit_inputs_request)
> > return 0;
> >
> > - err = damon_lru_sort_apply_parameters();
> > - commit_inputs = false;
> > - return err;
> > + /*
> > + * Skip damon_call() during early boot or when kdamond is
> > + * not running to avoid NULL pointer dereference.
> > + */
> > + if (!ctx)
> > + return -EBUSY;
> > +
> > + err = damon_call(ctx, &control);
>
> Can this sequence lead to a system-wide deadlock on kernel_param_lock?
>
> Because damon_lru_sort_commit_inputs_store() is a sysfs .set callback, it
> executes with the global kernel_param_lock held.
>
> If kdamond_fn terminates (e.g., due to an invalid parameter like addr_unit=3
> causing a non-power-of-2 min_region_sz), it processes its exit sequence by
> calling kdamond_call(ctx, true) to flush pending requests. After flushing, it
> eventually sets ctx->kdamond = NULL at the very end of the thread.
>
> If a user writes to commit_inputs exactly in the window after
> kdamond_call() finishes but before ctx->kdamond = NULL is set:
>
> Thread 1 (kdamond_fn):
> kdamond_call(ctx, true);
>
> Thread 2 (sysfs write):
> damon_call(ctx, &control);
> if (damon_is_running(ctx))
> wait_for_completion(&control.completion);
>
> Thread 1 (kdamond_fn):
> ctx->kdamond = NULL;
>
> Thread 2 will sleep indefinitely in wait_for_completion(). Because Thread 2
> holds the global kernel_param_lock, this permanently freezes all module
> parameter sysfs interfaces system-wide.
I have verified this behavior with the following test case:
# cd /sys/module/damon_lru_sort/parameters/
# echo Y > enabled
# ps aux | grep "[k]damond"
root 70 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? I 12:16 0:00 [kdamond.0]
# echo 3 > addr_unit
# echo Y > commit_inputs
bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
# ps aux | grep "[k]damond"
... kdamond has exited unexpectedly
I will add a patch in v6 to validate 'addr_unit' in addr_unit_store() to
reject non-power-of-2 inputs immediately.
> > + if (err) {
> > + /*
> > + * If kdamond is not running, damon_call() returns -EINVAL.
> > + * Remap it to -EBUSY to better reflect that the operation
> > + * failed due to the current state of the system.
> > + */
> > + if (err == -EINVAL && !damon_is_running(ctx))
> > + return -EBUSY;
> > +
> > + return err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return control.return_code;
> > }
>
> > diff --git a/mm/damon/reclaim.c b/mm/damon/reclaim.c
> > index 86da14778658..4cbd67e08d56 100644
> > --- a/mm/damon/reclaim.c
> > +++ b/mm/damon/reclaim.c
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > + /*
> > + * Skip damon_call() during early boot or when kdamond is
> > + * not running to avoid NULL pointer dereference.
> > + */
> > + if (!ctx)
> > + return -EBUSY;
> > +
> > + err = damon_call(ctx, &control);
>
> Does this code share the same kernel_param_lock deadlock potential as
> damon_lru_sort_commit_inputs_store() described above?
As we discussed in the RFC-v4 thread [1], this is a false positive.
Since 'enabled=N' and 'commit_inputs=Y' are both serialized by the
global 'kernel_param_lock', and kthreads cannot be forcibly terminated
by userspace signals, the completion signal in damon_call() will always
be reached in a controlled manner.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/20260323021648.6590-1-aethernet65535@gmail.com
Best regards,
Rui Yan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-25 7:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-25 1:39 [RFC v5] mm/damon: add synchronous commit for commit_inputs Liew Rui Yan
2026-03-25 2:53 ` (sashiko review) " SeongJae Park
2026-03-25 7:17 ` Liew Rui Yan [this message]
2026-03-25 14:19 ` SeongJae Park
2026-03-26 6:15 ` Liew Rui Yan
2026-03-25 14:29 ` SeongJae Park
2026-03-26 6:16 ` Liew Rui Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260325071709.9699-1-aethernet65535@gmail.com \
--to=aethernet65535@gmail.com \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox