From: Zhang Peng <zippermonkey@icloud.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>, Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>,
Zhang Peng <bruzzhang@tencent.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/5] mm/vmscan: flush TLB for every 31 folios evictions
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 16:36:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260326-batch-tlb-flush-v2-5-403e523325c4@icloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260326-batch-tlb-flush-v2-0-403e523325c4@icloud.com>
From: Zhang Peng <bruzzhang@tencent.com>
Currently we flush TLB for every dirty folio, which is a bottleneck for
systems with many cores as this causes heavy IPI usage.
So instead, batch the folios, and flush once for every 31 folios (one
folio_batch). These folios will be held in a folio_batch releasing their
lock, then when folio_batch is full, do following steps:
- For each folio: lock - check still evictable (writeback, lru, mapped,
dma_pinned)
- If no longer evictable, put back to LRU
- Flush TLB once for the batch
- Pageout the folios
Note we can't hold a frozen folio in folio_batch for long as it will
cause filemap/swapcache lookup to livelock. Fortunately pageout usually
won't take too long; sync IO is fast, and non-sync IO will be issued
with the folio marked writeback.
Suggested-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Peng <bruzzhang@tencent.com>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 63cc88c875e8..27de8034f582 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1217,6 +1217,47 @@ static void pageout_one(struct folio *folio, struct list_head *ret_folios,
folio_test_unevictable(folio), folio);
}
+static void pageout_batch(struct folio_batch *fbatch,
+ struct list_head *ret_folios,
+ struct folio_batch *free_folios,
+ struct scan_control *sc, struct reclaim_stat *stat,
+ struct swap_iocb **plug, struct list_head *folio_list)
+{
+ int i, count = folio_batch_count(fbatch);
+ struct folio *folio;
+
+ folio_batch_reinit(fbatch);
+ for (i = 0; i < count; ++i) {
+ folio = fbatch->folios[i];
+ if (!folio_trylock(folio)) {
+ list_add(&folio->lru, ret_folios);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ if (folio_test_writeback(folio) || folio_test_lru(folio) ||
+ folio_mapped(folio) || folio_maybe_dma_pinned(folio)) {
+ folio_unlock(folio);
+ list_add(&folio->lru, ret_folios);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ folio_batch_add(fbatch, folio);
+ }
+
+ i = 0;
+ count = folio_batch_count(fbatch);
+ if (!count)
+ return;
+ /* One TLB flush for the batch */
+ try_to_unmap_flush_dirty();
+ for (i = 0; i < count; ++i) {
+ folio = fbatch->folios[i];
+ pageout_one(folio, ret_folios, free_folios, sc, stat, plug,
+ folio_list);
+ }
+ folio_batch_reinit(fbatch);
+}
+
static bool folio_try_unmap(struct folio *folio, struct reclaim_stat *stat,
unsigned int nr_pages)
{
@@ -1264,6 +1305,8 @@ static void shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list,
struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
struct folio_batch free_folios;
+ struct folio_batch flush_folios;
+
LIST_HEAD(ret_folios);
LIST_HEAD(demote_folios);
unsigned int nr_demoted = 0;
@@ -1272,6 +1315,8 @@ static void shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list,
struct swap_iocb *plug = NULL;
folio_batch_init(&free_folios);
+ folio_batch_init(&flush_folios);
+
memset(stat, 0, sizeof(*stat));
cond_resched();
do_demote_pass = can_demote(pgdat->node_id, sc, memcg);
@@ -1565,15 +1610,21 @@ static void shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list,
goto keep_locked;
if (!sc->may_writepage)
goto keep_locked;
-
/*
- * Folio is dirty. Flush the TLB if a writable entry
- * potentially exists to avoid CPU writes after I/O
- * starts and then write it out here.
+ * For anon, we should only see swap cache (anon) and
+ * the list pinning the page. For file page, the filemap
+ * and the list pins it. The folio is unlocked while
+ * held in the batch, so pageout_batch() relocks each
+ * folio and rechecks its state. If the folio is under
+ * writeback, on LRU, mapped, or DMA-pinned, it will
+ * not be written out and is put back to LRU list.
*/
- try_to_unmap_flush_dirty();
- pageout_one(folio, &ret_folios, &free_folios, sc, stat,
- &plug, folio_list);
+ folio_unlock(folio);
+ if (!folio_batch_add(&flush_folios, folio))
+ pageout_batch(&flush_folios,
+ &ret_folios, &free_folios,
+ sc, stat, &plug,
+ folio_list);
goto next;
}
@@ -1603,6 +1654,10 @@ static void shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list,
next:
continue;
}
+ if (folio_batch_count(&flush_folios)) {
+ pageout_batch(&flush_folios, &ret_folios, &free_folios, sc,
+ stat, &plug, folio_list);
+ }
/* 'folio_list' is always empty here */
/* Migrate folios selected for demotion */
--
2.43.7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-26 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-26 8:36 [PATCH v2 0/5] mm: batch TLB flushing for dirty folios in vmscan Zhang Peng
2026-03-26 8:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mm/vmscan: track reclaimed pages in reclaim_stat Zhang Peng
2026-03-26 8:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] mm/vmscan: extract folio activation into folio_active_bounce() Zhang Peng
2026-03-26 8:36 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] mm/vmscan: extract folio_free() and pageout_one() Zhang Peng
2026-03-26 8:36 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] mm/vmscan: extract folio unmap logic into folio_try_unmap() Zhang Peng
2026-03-26 8:36 ` Zhang Peng [this message]
2026-03-26 12:40 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] mm/vmscan: flush TLB for every 31 folios evictions Pedro Falcato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260326-batch-tlb-flush-v2-5-403e523325c4@icloud.com \
--to=zippermonkey@icloud.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=bruzzhang@tencent.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox