From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"# 6 . 14 . x" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: (sashiko review) [PATCH 1/2] mm/damon/core: fix damon_call() vs kdamond_fn() exit race
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 17:43:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260328004307.7244-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260327233319.3528-2-sj@kernel.org>
Forwarding Sashiko review for doing discussions via mails.
# review url: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260327233319.3528-2-sj@kernel.org
# start of sashiko.dev inline review
commit 9cf54c95f0c4bda07c5dbaf4019d0d731f6c58fd
Author: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
mm/damon/core: fix damon_call() vs kdamond_fn() exit race
This commit introduces a new call_controls_obsolete flag to prevent
damon_call() from adding requests to a terminating kdamond context.
It removes the after-registration DAMON context termination check.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260325141956.87144-1-sj@kernel.org
> diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> index db6c67e52d2b..9bcda2765ac9 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1629,10 +1604,12 @@ int damon_call(struct damon_ctx *ctx, struct damon_call_control *control)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&control->list);
>
> mutex_lock(&ctx->call_controls_lock);
> + if (ctx->call_controls_obsolete) {
> + mutex_unlock(&ctx->call_controls_lock);
> + return -ECANCELED;
> + }
> list_add_tail(&control->list, &ctx->call_controls);
> mutex_unlock(&ctx->call_controls_lock);
> - if (!damon_is_running(ctx))
> - return damon_call_handle_inactive_ctx(ctx, control);
> if (control->repeat)
> return 0;
> wait_for_completion(&control->completion);
Can this code trigger a use-after-free on control?
This appears to be a pre-existing issue that remains unfixed. If
kdamond_fn() is terminating, it executes kdamond_call(ctx, true). This
function removes the request, sets it as canceled, and calls kfree(control)
if control->dealloc_on_cancel is true.
Since ctx->call_controls_lock is dropped right before the control->repeat
check:
CPU1 (kdamond_fn)
kdamond_call(ctx, true)
list_del(&control->list);
kfree(control);
CPU2 (damon_call)
mutex_unlock(&ctx->call_controls_lock);
if (control->repeat)
Could kdamond_call() free control before damon_call() evaluates
control->repeat?
Furthermore, if memory poisoning causes the freed memory to evaluate
control->repeat as false, would this proceed to call wait_for_completion()
on the freed memory and cause wait queue corruption?
# end of sashiko.dev inline review
# review url: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260327233319.3528-2-sj@kernel.org
#
# hkml [1] generated a draft of this mail. It can be regenerated
# using below command:
#
# hkml patch sashiko_dev --for_forwarding \
# 20260327233319.3528-2-sj@kernel.org
#
# [1] https://github.com/sjp38/hackermail
Sent using hkml (https://github.com/sjp38/hackermail)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-28 0:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-27 23:33 [PATCH 0/2] mm/damon/core: fix damon_call()/damos_walk() vs kdmond exit race SeongJae Park
2026-03-27 23:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/damon/core: fix damon_call() vs kdamond_fn() " SeongJae Park
2026-03-28 0:43 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2026-03-28 0:51 ` (sashiko review) " SeongJae Park
2026-03-27 23:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/damon/core: fix damos_walk() " SeongJae Park
2026-03-28 0:42 ` (sashiko status) [PATCH 0/2] mm/damon/core: fix damon_call()/damos_walk() vs kdmond " SeongJae Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260328004307.7244-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox