public inbox for linux-mm@kvack.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@gmail.com>
To: sj@kernel.org
Cc: aethernet65535@gmail.com, damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: (sashiko review) [PATCH] mm/damon: add synchronous commit for commit_inputs
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2026 02:08:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260328180827.8136-1-aethernet65535@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260328140907.10389-1-sj@kernel.org>

On Sat, 28 Mar 2026 07:09:06 -0700 SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Sat, 28 Mar 2026 18:44:50 +0800 Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> > > The previous module_param(..., bool) macro used param_ops_bool, which
> > > includes the KERNEL_PARAM_OPS_FL_NOARG flag. This allows parameters to be
> > > provided as a standalone flag without an explicit value.
> > > 
> > > By omitting this flag here, does providing the parameter without an explicit
> > > value now produce a parsing error?
> > 
> > To be honest, I was not aware of the implications of omitting the NOARG
> > flag. It was not a deliberate choice on my part.
> > 
> > SeongJae, what are your thoughts on this? SHould we stick with the
> > explicit 'commit_inputs=Y' requirement for the new synchronous behavior,
> > or should we restore the NOARG compatibility?
> 
> Should be a no big deal.  But it would better to keep the compatibility unless
> it makes things too difficult.  And it seems simple to do.  Could you please do
> that?

Sure, I will restore the NOARG compatibility in the next version.

> > 
> > > > +	.set = damon_lru_sort_commit_inputs_store,
> > > > +	.get = param_get_bool,
> > > > +};
> > > 
> > > The commit_inputs_store function parses the input into a local variable
> > > commit_inputs_request but never writes to the global commit_inputs variable.
> > > 
> > > Because param_get_bool reads the unmodified global commit_inputs variable,
> > > will sysfs reads of commit_inputs unconditionally return 'N'?
> > 
> > This is actually a design choice we discussed [2]. Since 'commit_inputs'
> > is now a synchronous trigger (or a "button") rather than a persistent
> > state, it doesn't necessarily need to store the 'Y' value.
> 
> I agree to all Liew's opinions.

Great! Glad we are aligned on the design.

> [...]
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/20260327233319.3528-1-sj@kernel.org (Lastest
> > but may not the last fix)
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/20260323150544.81042-1-sj@kernel.org
> [...]

Best regards,
Rui Yan


      reply	other threads:[~2026-03-28 18:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-28  8:45 [PATCH] mm/damon: add synchronous commit for commit_inputs Liew Rui Yan
2026-03-28  9:36 ` (sashiko review) " Liew Rui Yan
2026-03-28 10:44   ` Liew Rui Yan
2026-03-28 14:09     ` SeongJae Park
2026-03-28 18:08       ` Liew Rui Yan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260328180827.8136-1-aethernet65535@gmail.com \
    --to=aethernet65535@gmail.com \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox