From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lirongqing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/vmalloc: Use dedicated unbound workqueue for vmap purge/drain
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 12:16:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260330121625.c69f46a63c86c9540b823398@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260330175824.2777270-1-urezki@gmail.com>
On Mon, 30 Mar 2026 19:58:24 +0200 "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com> wrote:
> The drain_vmap_area_work() function can take >10ms to complete
> when there are many accumulated vmap areas in a system with a
> high CPU count, causing workqueue watchdog warnings when run
> via schedule_work():
>
> [ 2069.796205] workqueue: drain_vmap_area_work hogged CPU for >10000us 4 times, consider switching to WQ_UNBOUND
> [ 2192.823225] workqueue: drain_vmap_area_work hogged CPU for >10000us 5 times, consider switching to WQ_UNBOUND
>
> Switch to a dedicated WQ_UNBOUND workqueue to allow the scheduler to
> run this background task on any available CPU, improving responsiveness.
> Use WQ_MEM_RECLAIM to ensure forward progress under memory pressure.
>
> If queuing work to the dedicated workqueue is not possible(during
> early boot), fall back to processing locally to avoid losing progress.
>
> Also simplify purge helper scheduling by removing cpumask-based
> iteration in favour to iterating directly over vmap nodes with
> pending work.
Thanks. AI review flagged a couple of possible issues. Do they look
real to you?
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260330175824.2777270-1-urezki@gmail.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-30 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-30 17:58 [PATCH v2] mm/vmalloc: Use dedicated unbound workqueue for vmap purge/drain Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2026-03-30 18:56 ` Andrew Morton
2026-03-31 9:35 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2026-03-30 19:16 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2026-03-31 9:39 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2026-03-31 14:11 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2026-03-31 7:42 ` [syzbot ci] " syzbot ci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260330121625.c69f46a63c86c9540b823398@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lirongqing@baidu.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox