From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Chunyu Hu <chuhu@redhat.com>,
oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [akpm-mm:mm-unstable 121/130] tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h:427:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'vasprintf'; did you mean 'vsprintf'?
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 11:23:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260331112341.83f62d4d4de710457ecb59c1@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202603311105.ysUeYPSZ-lkp@intel.com>
On Tue, 31 Mar 2026 11:27:20 +0200 kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-unstable
> head: 24e341657c283c965e3bfee0baa9ed0376127973
> commit: cc0b04b10a7b98fd8df2fd539177e94e0f83a5c3 [121/130] selftests: ksft_exit_fail_perror: support printf style arguments
> config: arm64-allnoconfig-bpf (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260331/202603311105.ysUeYPSZ-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260331/202603311105.ysUeYPSZ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202603311105.ysUeYPSZ-lkp@intel.com/
>
> Note: the akpm-mm/mm-unstable HEAD 24e341657c283c965e3bfee0baa9ed0376127973 builds fine.
> It only hurts bisectability.
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> In file included from za-fork.c:12:
> ../../kselftest.h: In function 'ksft_exit_fail_perror':
> >> ../../kselftest.h:427:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'vasprintf'; did you mean 'vsprintf'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 427 | if (vasprintf(&buf, msg, args) == -1) {
> | ^~~~~~~~~
> | vsprintf
What's going on here. vasprintf is a GNU thing, but that isn't it.
kselftest.h includes stdio.h directly so fine. I don't see anything in
the later patches which could alter this, so the "only hurts
bisectability" is inexplicable.
I was able to reproduce this, once. Now it's gone away.
And arm64 allnoconfig is a nuisance. Now my vmlinux build immediately
faceplants with
./arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h:298:9: error: unknown type name 'u128'
298 | u128 full;
With the latest 15.2.0 kit from https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-31 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-31 9:27 [akpm-mm:mm-unstable 121/130] tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h:427:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'vasprintf'; did you mean 'vsprintf'? kernel test robot
2026-03-31 18:23 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2026-04-01 6:00 ` Philip Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260331112341.83f62d4d4de710457ecb59c1@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chuhu@redhat.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox