public inbox for linux-mm@kvack.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@gmail.com>
To: aethernet65535@gmail.com, sj@kernel.org
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: (sashiko review) [PATCH] mm/damon: validate min_region_size to be power of 2
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 23:13:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260331151330.6972-1-aethernet65535@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260331150009.5014-1-aethernet65535@gmail.com>

> > [...]
> > diff --git a/mm/damon/lru_sort.c b/mm/damon/lru_sort.c
> > index 554559d72976..205592194efd 100644
> > --- a/mm/damon/lru_sort.c
> > +++ b/mm/damon/lru_sort.c
> > @@ -294,6 +294,9 @@ static int damon_lru_sort_apply_parameters(void)
> >  	param_ctx->addr_unit = addr_unit;
> >  	param_ctx->min_region_sz = max(DAMON_MIN_REGION_SZ / addr_unit, 1);
> >  
> > +	if (!is_power_of_2(param_ctx->min_region_sz))
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> 
> Does this code leak the allocated param_ctx?
> 
> Looking earlier in damon_lru_sort_apply_parameters(), param_ctx is allocated
> via damon_modules_new_paddr_ctx_target(). The existing error paths below
> this check use a goto out; to ensure damon_destroy_ctx(param_ctx) is called.
> 
> By returning directly here, does it skip freeing param_ctx?
> 

You are absolutely right. I missed the cleanup path here.

I should have used 'err = -EINVAL; goto out;' to ensure 'param_ctx' is
properly freed, similar to the existing error handling below.

> >  	if (!damon_lru_sort_mon_attrs.sample_interval) {
> >  		err = -EINVAL;
> >  		goto out;
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> > diff --git a/mm/damon/reclaim.c b/mm/damon/reclaim.c
> > index 86da14778658..6e29d92670c4 100644
> > --- a/mm/damon/reclaim.c
> > +++ b/mm/damon/reclaim.c
> > @@ -204,6 +204,9 @@ static int damon_reclaim_apply_parameters(void)
> >  	param_ctx->addr_unit = addr_unit;
> >  	param_ctx->min_region_sz = max(DAMON_MIN_REGION_SZ / addr_unit, 1);
> >  
> > +	if (!is_power_of_2(param_ctx->min_region_sz))
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> 
> Can this result in a similar leak in the reclaim path?
> 
> Like the previous file, param_ctx is allocated earlier in this function
> and there is an out label that handles cleaning up the context. Could this
> be changed to set err = -EINVAL; and goto out; instead of returning directly?

I will fix this in the next version. Thank you for the catch!

> 
> >  	if (!damon_reclaim_mon_attrs.aggr_interval) {
> >  		err = -EINVAL;
> >  		goto out;
> 
> 
> # end of sashiko.dev inline review
> # review url: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260331073231.30060-1-aethernet65535@gmail.com
> #
> # hkml [1] generated a draft of this mail.  It can be regenerated
> # using below command:
> #
> #     hkml patch sashiko_dev --for_forwarding \
> #             20260331073231.30060-1-aethernet65535@gmail.com
> #
> # [1] https://github.com/sjp38/hackermail

Best regards,
Rui Yan


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-31 15:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-31  7:32 [PATCH] mm/damon: validate min_region_size to be power of 2 Liew Rui Yan
2026-03-31 15:00 ` (sashiko review) " Liew Rui Yan
2026-03-31 15:13   ` Liew Rui Yan [this message]
2026-04-01  1:01 ` SeongJae Park
2026-04-01  8:40   ` Liew Rui Yan
2026-04-01 15:31     ` SeongJae Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260331151330.6972-1-aethernet65535@gmail.com \
    --to=aethernet65535@gmail.com \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox