Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/damon: reset thread status parameters upon kdamond termination

[Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@gmail.com>]

Hi SeongJae,

First of all, I apologize for not completely answering your question,
and I will be more careful next time.

On Tue, 31 Mar 2026 17:29:18 -0700 SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 31 Mar 2026 14:58:36 +0800 Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi SeongJae,
> > 
> > On Mon, 30 Mar 2026 22:02:28 -0700 SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Nice catch!
> > > 
> > > I guess this can easily reproducible?  Sharing detailed reproduction steps
> > > would be nice.
> > 
> > I will include the reproduction steps in the next version.
> 
> Please completely answer questions.  You didn't answer the first question.

Yes, this issue is easily reproducible. Specifically, setting
'addr_unit=3' and then 'commit_inputs=Y' triggers it. I will include the
detailed reproduction steps in the next version's commit message.

> > > [...]
> > > This feels too much extension of core API for a problem that can more simply be
> > > fixed.  Can't we detect the unexpected termination of kdamond from the modules
> > > and update the paramter values accordingly?

Yes, we can detect it. From the module, we can check '!
damon_is_running(ctx)' in conjunction with 'ctx->maybe_corrupted'. Since
'maybe_corrupted' persists until the next initialization, it
effectively indicates whether the kdamond terminated unexpectedly.

> [...]
> Please do not add '> ' to your reply.  This confuses me.  Also, again, please
> completely answer questions.  You didn't answer if we can or cannot detect the
> unexpected termination.

I'm very sorry for the formatting error. I accidentally miselected lines
in my editor while batch-prepending "> " to the quoted text. I will be
much more careful with my editor operations.

> I will reply to below in another reply, as you added a few things to that part,
> while cutting the above part.  When you reply to your reply, please consider
> keeping the previous reply part.  Then I can reply to your two mails at one
> place.  That would help my life :)

Understood! I will keep the previous context in my replies to make the
discussion easier to follow and reply. Thank you for your patience and
guidance!

Best regards,
Rui Yan