public inbox for linux-mm@kvack.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
To: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org,
	ziy@nvidia.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
	Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, npache@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
	dev.jain@arm.com, baohua@kernel.org, matthew.brost@intel.com,
	joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com, rakie.kim@sk.com, byungchul@sk.com,
	gourry@gourry.net, ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com,
	apopple@nvidia.com, richard.weiyang@gmail.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kartikey406@gmail.com,
	syzbot+a7067a757858ac8eb085@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm-unstable 1/1] mm: fix deferred split queue races during migration
Date: Wed,  1 Apr 2026 09:28:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260401162855.146945-1-usama.arif@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260401131032.13011-1-lance.yang@linux.dev>

On Wed,  1 Apr 2026 21:10:32 +0800 Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev> wrote:

> From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
> 
> migrate_folio_move() records the deferred split queue state from src and
> replays it on dst. Replaying it after remove_migration_ptes(src, dst, 0)
> makes dst visible before it is requeued, so a concurrent rmap-removal path
> can mark dst partially mapped and trip the WARN in deferred_split_folio().
> 
> Move the requeue before remove_migration_ptes() so dst is back on the
> deferred split queue before it becomes visible again.
> 
> Because migration still holds dst locked at that point, teach
> deferred_split_scan() to requeue a folio when folio_trylock() fails.
> Otherwise a fully mapped underused folio can be dequeued by the shrinker
> and silently lost from split_queue.
> 
> Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=a7067a757858ac8eb085
> Fixes: 8a8ca142a488 ("mm: migrate: requeue destination folio on deferred split queue")
> Reported-by: syzbot+a7067a757858ac8eb085@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/69ccb65b.050a0220.183828.003a.GAE@google.com/
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
> ---
> 
> [ Backport note ]
> This patch is a follow-up fix for 8a8ca142a488 ("mm: migrate: requeue
> destination folio on deferred split queue"), which is currently only in
> mm-stable, and should be backported together with it.
> 
> Credit for this fix goes to David, thanks!
> 
>  mm/huge_memory.c | 12 +++++++-----
>  mm/migrate.c     | 18 +++++++++---------
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 


Thanks for the fix! And sorry for introducing the bug in
migrate_folio_move() :)

So I am happy with the migrate_folio_move() change, it makes sense.

The goto next if folio is locked in deferred_split_scan() was actually
on purpose. The reasoning was that if the folio is locked, we consider
it as in use by someone and therefore we shouldnt split it. Eventhough
thp_underused() does a zero-filled check, the whole point of the shrinker
was to split THPs that are "not in use", and in my mind, locked folio
is a folio in use. So not sure about that change..


> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index ff9a42abd1b6..ac6d823e351f 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -4558,7 +4558,7 @@ static unsigned long deferred_split_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
>  				goto next;
>  		}
>  		if (!folio_trylock(folio))
> -			goto next;
> +			goto requeue;
>  		if (!split_folio(folio)) {
>  			did_split = true;
>  			if (underused)
> @@ -4569,11 +4569,13 @@ static unsigned long deferred_split_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
>  next:
>  		if (did_split || !folio_test_partially_mapped(folio))
>  			continue;
> +requeue:
>  		/*
> -		 * Only add back to the queue if folio is partially mapped.
> -		 * If thp_underused returns false, or if split_folio fails
> -		 * in the case it was underused, then consider it used and
> -		 * don't add it back to split_queue.
> +		 * Add back partially mapped folios, or underused folios
> +		 * that we could not lock this round.  If thp_underused()
> +		 * returns false, or if split_folio() succeeds, or if
> +		 * split_folio() fails in the case it was underused, then
> +		 * consider it used and don't add it back to split_queue.
>  		 */
>  		fqueue = folio_split_queue_lock_irqsave(folio, &flags);
>  		if (list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list)) {
> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
> index 05cb408846f2..8a64291ab5b4 100644
> --- a/mm/migrate.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> @@ -1385,6 +1385,15 @@ static int migrate_folio_move(free_folio_t put_new_folio, unsigned long private,
>  	if (rc)
>  		goto out;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Requeue the destination folio on the deferred split queue if
> +	 * the source was on the queue.  The source is unqueued in
> +	 * __folio_migrate_mapping(), so we recorded the state from
> +	 * before move_to_new_folio().
> +	 */
> +	if (src_deferred_split)
> +		deferred_split_folio(dst, src_partially_mapped);
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * When successful, push dst to LRU immediately: so that if it
>  	 * turns out to be an mlocked page, remove_migration_ptes() will
> @@ -1401,15 +1410,6 @@ static int migrate_folio_move(free_folio_t put_new_folio, unsigned long private,
>  	if (old_page_state & PAGE_WAS_MAPPED)
>  		remove_migration_ptes(src, dst, 0);
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Requeue the destination folio on the deferred split queue if
> -	 * the source was on the queue.  The source is unqueued in
> -	 * __folio_migrate_mapping(), so we recorded the state from
> -	 * before move_to_new_folio().
> -	 */
> -	if (src_deferred_split)
> -		deferred_split_folio(dst, src_partially_mapped);
> -
>  out_unlock_both:
>  	folio_unlock(dst);
>  	folio_set_owner_migrate_reason(dst, reason);
> -- 
> 2.49.0
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-01 16:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-01 13:10 [PATCH mm-unstable 1/1] mm: fix deferred split queue races during migration Lance Yang
2026-04-01 16:28 ` Usama Arif [this message]
2026-04-01 18:50   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-01 18:51 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-01 19:21 ` Zi Yan
2026-04-01 22:55   ` Zi Yan
2026-04-01 23:19     ` Andrew Morton
2026-04-03  4:24       ` Lance Yang
2026-04-01 21:48 ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260401162855.146945-1-usama.arif@linux.dev \
    --to=usama.arif@linux.dev \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=byungchul@sk.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
    --cc=kartikey406@gmail.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=npache@redhat.com \
    --cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
    --cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+a7067a757858ac8eb085@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox