public inbox for linux-mm@kvack.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@gmail.com>
To: aethernet65535@gmail.com
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org, sj@kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, yanquanmin1@huawei.com
Subject: Re: (sashiko review) [PATCH v3 1/2] mm/damon/lru_sort: validate min_region_size to be power of 2
Date: Fri,  3 Apr 2026 16:31:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260403083125.5654-1-aethernet65535@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260403052837.58063-2-aethernet65535@gmail.com>

Forwarding Sashiko review for doing discussions via mails.

# review url: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260403052837.58063-2-aethernet65535@gmail.com
# start of sashiko.dev inline review
commit 525a0116b6d91612e679b30ae84e489a7540edbf
Author: Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@gmail.com>

mm/damon/lru_sort: validate min_region_size to be power of 2

This commit adds an early check in damon_lru_sort_apply_parameters() to
ensure min_region_sz is a power of 2. This prevents kdamond from unexpectedly
terminating when given an invalid addr_unit.

> diff --git a/mm/damon/lru_sort.c b/mm/damon/lru_sort.c
> index 554559d729760..3fd176ef9d9c1 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/lru_sort.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/lru_sort.c
> @@ -294,6 +294,11 @@ static int damon_lru_sort_apply_parameters(void)
>  	param_ctx->addr_unit = addr_unit;
>  	param_ctx->min_region_sz = max(DAMON_MIN_REGION_SZ / addr_unit, 1);
>  
> +	if (!is_power_of_2(param_ctx->min_region_sz)) {
> +		err = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +

Instead of adding this early check here, could this be resolved by fixing
the stateless validation in damon_commit_ctx() directly?

Looking at damon_commit_ctx(), it currently sets dst->maybe_corrupted = true
before checking if src->min_region_sz is a power of 2:

int damon_commit_ctx(struct damon_ctx *dst, struct damon_ctx *src)
{
	int err;

	dst->maybe_corrupted = true;
	if (!is_power_of_2(src->min_region_sz))
		return -EINVAL;
...
}

When this validation fails, it leaves the active context marked as corrupted
without making any state changes, which causes the kdamond thread to terminate
permanently. Moving the stateless is_power_of_2() check above
dst->maybe_corrupted = true would resolve the regression for all current and
future callers without requiring duplicated validation logic at every
call site.

Does this missing validation also affect mm/damon/sysfs.c?

When a user starts DAMON via state_store() -> damon_sysfs_turn_damon_on(),
the code calls damon_sysfs_build_ctx(). This calculates min_region_sz and
then directly calls damon_start(), bypassing damon_commit_ctx() entirely.

Because this bypasses the is_power_of_2() checks, kdamond can actively run
with a non-power-of-2 min_region_sz. Core DAMON operations like
damon_set_regions() use ALIGN() and ALIGN_DOWN() with min_region_sz, which
perform bitwise masking that requires the alignment parameter to be a
power of 2.

Could this allow userspace to trigger incorrect address boundaries, massive
unsigned underflows, or infinite loops during region splitting?

>  	if (!damon_lru_sort_mon_attrs.sample_interval) {
>  		err = -EINVAL;
>  		goto out;


# end of sashiko.dev inline review
# review url: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260403052837.58063-2-aethernet65535@gmail.com
#
# hkml [1] generated a draft of this mail.  It can be regenerated
# using below command:
#
#     hkml patch sashiko_dev --for_forwarding \
#             20260403052837.58063-2-aethernet65535@gmail.com
#
# [1] https://github.com/sjp38/hackermail


  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-03  8:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-03  5:23 [PATCH v3 0/2] mm/damon: validate min_region_size to be power of 2 Liew Rui Yan
2026-04-03  5:23 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mm/damon/lru_sort: " Liew Rui Yan
2026-04-03  8:31   ` Liew Rui Yan [this message]
2026-04-03 15:55     ` (sashiko review) " SeongJae Park
2026-04-04  9:09       ` Liew Rui Yan
2026-04-04 20:18         ` SeongJae Park
2026-04-03  8:59   ` Quanmin Yan
2026-04-03  9:50     ` Liew Rui Yan
2026-04-03 16:19   ` SeongJae Park
2026-04-04  9:11     ` Liew Rui Yan
2026-04-04 20:30       ` SeongJae Park
2026-04-06  9:41         ` Liew Rui Yan
2026-04-06 15:50           ` SeongJae Park
2026-04-03  5:23 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mm/damon/reclaim: " Liew Rui Yan
2026-04-03  8:33   ` (sashiko review) " Liew Rui Yan
2026-04-03 16:07     ` SeongJae Park
2026-04-03 16:20   ` SeongJae Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260403083125.5654-1-aethernet65535@gmail.com \
    --to=aethernet65535@gmail.com \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yanquanmin1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox