public inbox for linux-mm@kvack.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@gmail.com>
To: sj@kernel.org
Cc: aethernet65535@gmail.com, damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: (sashiko review) [PATCH v4 1/2] mm/damon/lru_sort: validate min_region_size to be power of 2
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2026 00:46:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260410164610.6764-1-aethernet65535@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260410135500.81989-1-sj@kernel.org>

On Fri, 10 Apr 2026 06:55:00 -0700 SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 10 Apr 2026 17:40:04 +0800 Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Sashiko found some issues.
> 
> Clarifying what is the following action for the sashiko finding would be
> helpful.  For example, if you say "Sashiko found some issues, so I will post a
> new versiuon soon", and if I'm busy, I can save my time by saying "Ok, then I
> will skip or delaying review of this version and wait for your next review".

Okay, I will keep that in mind next time I foward a Sashiko's Review.
Thank you for you suggestion.

> [...]
> 
> Agreed.  This was unclear to me in previous disucssions, though.  I still agree
> it is out of the scope of this patch.  But now I think we need to let users
> force-restart.  Adding this to my todo list.

Just to make sure - is this the same issue that my recent RFC patch [1]
aims to address? I want to make sure we're not duplicating efforts.

I'm still actively working on that patch, and I plan to send the next
version next week. I've been holding off because I didn't want to send
multiple patches in parallel.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/20260330164347.12772-1-aethernet65535@gmail.com

Best regards,
Rui Yan


  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-10 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-10  4:42 [PATCH v4 0/2] mm/damon: validate min_region_size to be power of 2 Liew Rui Yan
2026-04-10  4:42 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] mm/damon/lru_sort: " Liew Rui Yan
2026-04-10  9:40   ` (sashiko review) " Liew Rui Yan
2026-04-10 13:55     ` SeongJae Park
2026-04-10 16:46       ` Liew Rui Yan [this message]
2026-04-10 17:00         ` SeongJae Park
2026-04-10 13:56   ` SeongJae Park
2026-04-10  4:42 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] mm/damon/reclaim: " Liew Rui Yan
2026-04-10 10:08   ` (sashiko review) " Liew Rui Yan
2026-04-10 13:44     ` SeongJae Park
2026-04-10 13:57   ` SeongJae Park
2026-04-10 14:05 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] mm/damon: " SeongJae Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260410164610.6764-1-aethernet65535@gmail.com \
    --to=aethernet65535@gmail.com \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox