From: Ahmed Elaidy <elaidya225@gmail.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, avagin@gmail.com,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
"David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@kernel.org>,
Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@oracle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Ahmed Elaidy <elaidya225@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 8/9] mm: propagate VM_SOFTDIRTY on merge
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2026 00:12:42 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260424211315.1072123-9-elaidya225@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260424211315.1072123-1-elaidya225@gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Patch series "make VM_SOFTDIRTY a sticky VMA flag", v2.
Currently we set VM_SOFTDIRTY when a new mapping is set up (whether by
establishing a new VMA, or via merge) as implemented in __mmap_complete()
and do_brk_flags().
However, when performing a merge of existing mappings such as when
performing mprotect(), we may lose the VM_SOFTDIRTY flag.
Now we have the concept of making VMA flags 'sticky', that is that they
both don't prevent merge and, importantly, are propagated to merged VMAs,
this seems a sensible alternative to the existing special-casing of
VM_SOFTDIRTY.
We additionally add a self-test that demonstrates that this logic behaves
as expected.
This patch (of 2):
Currently we set VM_SOFTDIRTY when a new mapping is set up (whether by
establishing a new VMA, or via merge) as implemented in __mmap_complete()
and do_brk_flags().
However, when performing a merge of existing mappings such as when
performing mprotect(), we may lose the VM_SOFTDIRTY flag.
This is because currently we simply ignore VM_SOFTDIRTY for the purposes
of merge, so one VMA may possess the flag and another not, and whichever
happens to be the target VMA will be the one upon which the merge is
performed which may or may not have VM_SOFTDIRTY set.
Now we have the concept of 'sticky' VMA flags, let's make VM_SOFTDIRTY one
which solves this issue.
Additionally update VMA userland tests to propagate changes.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: update comments, per Lorenzo]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/0019e0b8-ee1e-4359-b5ee-94225cbe5588@lucifer.local
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/cover.1763399675.git.lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/955478b5170715c895d1ef3b7f68e0cd77f76868.1763399675.git.lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>
Acked-by: Andrey Vagin <avagin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@oracle.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
(cherry picked from commit 6707915e030a3258868355f989b80140c1a45bbe)
Signed-off-by: Ahmed Elaidy <elaidya225@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/mm.h | 15 +++++++--------
tools/testing/vma/vma_internal.h | 18 ++++++------------
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 2bad4bf67d0f..a68bced816fe 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -515,28 +515,27 @@ extern unsigned int kobjsize(const void *objp);
* possesses it but the other does not, the merged VMA should nonetheless have
* applied to it:
*
+ * VM_SOFTDIRTY - if a VMA is marked soft-dirty, that is has not had its
+ * references cleared via /proc/$pid/clear_refs, any merged VMA
+ * should be considered soft-dirty also as it operates at a VMA
+ * granularity.
+ *
* VM_MAYBE_GUARD - If a VMA may have guard regions in place it implies that
* mapped page tables may contain metadata not described by the
* VMA and thus any merged VMA may also contain this metadata,
* and thus we must make this flag sticky.
*/
-#define VM_STICKY VM_MAYBE_GUARD
+#define VM_STICKY (VM_SOFTDIRTY | VM_MAYBE_GUARD)
/*
* VMA flags we ignore for the purposes of merge, i.e. one VMA possessing one
* of these flags and the other not does not preclude a merge.
*
- * VM_SOFTDIRTY - Should not prevent from VMA merging, if we match the flags but
- * dirty bit -- the caller should mark merged VMA as dirty. If
- * dirty bit won't be excluded from comparison, we increase
- * pressure on the memory system forcing the kernel to generate
- * new VMAs when old one could be extended instead.
- *
* VM_STICKY - When merging VMAs, VMA flags must match, unless they are
* 'sticky'. If any sticky flags exist in either VMA, we simply
* set all of them on the merged VMA.
*/
-#define VM_IGNORE_MERGE (VM_SOFTDIRTY | VM_STICKY)
+#define VM_IGNORE_MERGE VM_STICKY
/*
* Flags which should result in page tables being copied on fork. These are
diff --git a/tools/testing/vma/vma_internal.h b/tools/testing/vma/vma_internal.h
index 6ee803873e00..bff75a4c3c8c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/vma/vma_internal.h
+++ b/tools/testing/vma/vma_internal.h
@@ -122,28 +122,22 @@ extern unsigned long dac_mmap_min_addr;
* possesses it but the other does not, the merged VMA should nonetheless have
* applied to it:
*
- * VM_MAYBE_GUARD - If a VMA may have guard regions in place it implies that
- * mapped page tables may contain metadata not described by the
- * VMA and thus any merged VMA may also contain this metadata,
- * and thus we must make this flag sticky.
+ * VM_SOFTDIRTY - if a VMA is marked soft-dirty, that is has not had its
+ * references cleared via /proc/$pid/clear_refs, any merged VMA
+ * should be considered soft-dirty also as it operates at a VMA
+ * granularity.
*/
-#define VM_STICKY VM_MAYBE_GUARD
+#define VM_STICKY (VM_SOFTDIRTY | VM_MAYBE_GUARD)
/*
* VMA flags we ignore for the purposes of merge, i.e. one VMA possessing one
* of these flags and the other not does not preclude a merge.
*
- * VM_SOFTDIRTY - Should not prevent from VMA merging, if we match the flags but
- * dirty bit -- the caller should mark merged VMA as dirty. If
- * dirty bit won't be excluded from comparison, we increase
- * pressure on the memory system forcing the kernel to generate
- * new VMAs when old one could be extended instead.
- *
* VM_STICKY - When merging VMAs, VMA flags must match, unless they are
* 'sticky'. If any sticky flags exist in either VMA, we simply
* set all of them on the merged VMA.
*/
-#define VM_IGNORE_MERGE (VM_SOFTDIRTY | VM_STICKY)
+#define VM_IGNORE_MERGE VM_STICKY
/*
* Flags which should result in page tables being copied on fork. These are
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-24 21:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-24 21:12 [PATCH 6.18.y v1 0/9] mm: backport sticky VMA flags and soft-dirty fix Ahmed Elaidy
2026-04-24 21:12 ` [PATCH v1 1/9] mm: introduce VM_MAYBE_GUARD and make visible in /proc/$pid/smaps Ahmed Elaidy
2026-04-24 21:12 ` [PATCH v1 2/9] mm: add atomic VMA flags and set VM_MAYBE_GUARD as such Ahmed Elaidy
2026-04-24 21:12 ` [PATCH v1 3/9] mm: update vma_modify_flags() to handle residual flags, document Ahmed Elaidy
2026-04-24 21:12 ` [PATCH v1 4/9] mm: implement sticky VMA flags Ahmed Elaidy
2026-04-24 21:12 ` [PATCH v1 5/9] mm: introduce copy-on-fork VMAs and make VM_MAYBE_GUARD one Ahmed Elaidy
2026-04-24 21:12 ` [PATCH v1 6/9] mm: set the VM_MAYBE_GUARD flag on guard region install Ahmed Elaidy
2026-04-24 21:12 ` [PATCH v1 7/9] tools/testing/vma: add VMA sticky userland tests Ahmed Elaidy
2026-04-24 21:12 ` Ahmed Elaidy [this message]
2026-04-24 21:12 ` [PATCH v1 9/9] testing/selftests/mm: add soft-dirty merge self-test Ahmed Elaidy
2026-04-24 21:55 ` [PATCH 6.18.y v1 0/9] mm: backport sticky VMA flags and soft-dirty fix Andrei Vagin
2026-04-24 22:11 ` [PATCH v2] mm: fix VM_SOFTDIRTY propagation on VMA merge Ahmed Elaidy
2026-05-04 16:42 ` Andrei Vagin
2026-05-04 19:54 ` Ahmed Elaidy
2026-05-04 19:54 ` [PATCH 6.18.y v3] " Ahmed Elaidy
2026-05-04 19:58 ` [PATCH v2] " Ahmed Elaidy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260424211315.1072123-9-elaidya225@gmail.com \
--to=elaidya225@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avagin@gmail.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=liam.howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox